Don’t be fooled by the Public Education myth. The United States Supreme Court keeps persisting, over and over and over again that it is the parents’ duty to educate their children. Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, and there are dozens of cases on family privacy.
Public schools are the 10th plank of the communist manefisto. Communism cannot recognize individual rights. Collectivist nurturing of children was never part of our heritage. Central control of education has ruined education.
The Supreme Court (in Plyler) would not even say that children were subject to the laws of a state. And John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government — which is the foundation of most of the Declaration of Independence — said that parental rights are all based upon “divine revealed law” in the Bible. And that legitimate children when they are 21 years old would choose which government to place themselves under (paragraph 73).
Never let a liberal tell you that public education is a right.1 The Supreme Court, quoted below, says that education is not a fundamental right. Liberals tell you the opposite.
Never let a conservative tell you that you must register your children with the authorities. In the middle ages, the conservatives burned the anabaptists at the stake for refusing to register their children. The victims endured a painful death knowing that their orphans would be raised by their murderers. The anabaptists became today’s Amish, Mennonites and Baptists. They were true Christians. They stood2. Today’s self-called “Christians” refuse to understand the Gospel of Christ. They will line up to register their children to be raised by pagans at their neighbors’ expense. They know the educators are anti-Christian. And they even claim they are doing God’s will while forceably taking (taxing, coveting) their neighbors’ wealth to run these ungodly institutions.
We are not forced to register children. Yeager v. Hackensack NJ, 615 F.Supp 1088, citing the authority of Roe v. Wade, the federal court confirmed that “Right to be free from compelled disclosure of names of household members is within right of privacy protected by Constitution.”
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. “ — Thomas Jefferson, letter to Colonel Yancey, January 6, 1816:
Communism is un-American. Public schools are the 10th plank of the Communist Manifesto. Back when America was a free country, people never thought public schools would exist in America. After all, our state Constitutions just do not authorize such a thing [although they may authorize schools for the blind and deaf, and universities that charge tuition]. Rights can only come with responsibilities, and no one would have a right to force others to pay their children’s tuition. Even the U.S. Supreme Court in Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, concluded “it is the natural duty of the parent to give his children education suitable to their station in life…”
This is very similar to Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Law:
“The duty of parents for the maintenance of their [legitimate] children is a principle of natural law
The establishment of marriage in all civilized states is built on this natural obligation… The last duty of parents to their children is that of giving them an education suitable to their station in life
Yet the municipal laws constraining the parent to bestow a proper education upon his children made a wise provision for breeding up the rising generation… [these neglected children] are taken out of the hands of their parents.”
That’s right! By institutionalizing “your” children, you have confessed that you are incapable of raising your own children. You lose your parental rights. The children become wards of the state. It is no wonder family courts are so sure that they have jurisdiction over the state’s children. Activist judges no longer fear that they will be charged with kidnapping, genocide, and depravation of liberty under color of law. For un-surrendered children, state protection would be severely limited to a compelling state interest.
Who would ever send their children to ungodly indoctrination factories to be transformed into mindless robots for the state? This sounds too much like a science fiction story of an alternate future that went horribly wrong.
For those parents who forfeit their rights to their own children, Hillary’s village will be waiting to raise them. (If it takes a village to perform a natural duty that everyone has, then how competent can these villagers be? )
Yes, there are state schools for the blind and forced schooling for children of parents who cannot care for themselves. These were traditional common-law schools never intended for the vast majority. As we shall learn below, it was not until 1900 New York that socialist public schools were forced on an unsuspecting public.
Here is proof that mandatory public education IS genocide.
The Genocide Treaty ratified by the Senate on February 19, 1986, 78 UNTS 277, defines genocide in its Article II as
“any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such: … (d) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) forcibly transferring children of the group to another group”
I quoted the “prevent births” part of the treaty because government divorce is genocide. Intended to prevent births. The Supreme Court ruled that marriage “is a relation for life”. Maynard v. Hill, 125 U.S. 190 at page 211
If you don’t realize that Christian children are forcibly transferred to another group then you don’t understand why public schools were established.
Keep in mind that the legal word forcibly means compelled or compulsory. Compulsory is defined as: voluntary compliance under threat of violence (if you resist). How do you like that? Lawyer words Voluntary compliance means forced compliance.
US Congressman in the 1840’s Robert Dale Owen, later known as the father of American socialism, believed that the Christian faith hindered man’s evolution. An Owen associate wrote:
“The great object was to get rid of Christianity and to convert our churches into halls of science… the plan was not to make open attacks upon religion – although we might belabor the clergy and bring them into contempt where we could … but to establish a system of state – we said national – schools… from which all religion would be excluded and to which all parents were to be compelled by law to send their children.”
These views influenced John Dewey at the Columbia Teacher’s College, and by 1900 a socialist system of compulsory schools, which exclude religion, became a reality.
IT IS THE PARENTS’ DUTY TO EDUCATE THEIR CHILDREN.
The United States Supreme Court in a famous private school case, Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, 399: determined that liberty includes the right to marry and to raise children and to worship God, and these rights exist independently from any State authority
But, Those who fail to educate their own children will lose their children to state custody where they will be forced into public schools.
Once upon a time, back when the original 13 American States were writing their Constitutions, there was the received-law-of-the-land.
The received-law-of-the-land is described in a law encyclopedia of that time period. Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Law Book 1, chapter 16, which is entitled “The Rights of Children,” tells us that:
“The duty of parents for the maintenance of their children is a principle of natural law…
The establishment of marriage in all civilized states is built on this natural obligation… The last duty of parents to their children is that of giving them an education suitable to their station in life…
Yet the municipal laws … constraining the parent to bestow a proper education upon his children… made a wise provision for breeding up the rising generation… [these neglected children] are taken out of the hands of their parents.”
That’s right! By institutionalizing “your” children, you have confessed that you are incapable of raising your own children. YOU LOSE YOUR PARENTAL RIGHTS. The children become wards of the state. No wonder family courts are so sure that they have jurisdiction over the state’s children. Activist judges no longer fear that they will be charged with kidnapping, genocide, and depravation of liberty under color of law. Yet, for un-surrendered children, state protection would be severely limited to a compelling state interest.
Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Law says that a refusal to educate your children would result in the state (it used the term “municipal”) laws placing them in public schools.
Liberty, like any other freedom, is “susceptible to restriction only to prevent grave and immediate danger to interests which the state may lawfully protect” (This phrase was used in many Supreme Court decisions to protect your rights. Carrol v. Princess Anne 393 U.S. 175, Thomas v. Collins 323 U.S. 516, West Virginia v. Barnette 319 U.S. 624, in re Brown 9 Cal.3d 612 West’s Constitutional law, key 84, 90, 91 — etc.)
Interestingly, in my local school district, the registration form for enrolling a student does not need a parent’s signature. Another interesting point is that my local school district could not prove that they exist. Despite the public disclosure laws, they could not tell me if the document that created the school district is in their records, nor even if it ever existed.
(I suspect that wards of the state are collateral for the national debt, and are owned by foreign banks to which we owe the debt. Since the state has a duty to maximize the value of the foreign bank’s collateral, Public school laws are enacted to ensure some oversight in this process.)
The U.S. Supreme Court in Plyler v. Doe, 457 US 202, confirmed, “…education is not a fundamental right…”
Bibles were school textbooks until 1878 when Texas was the last State to require it.
In 1899 William Harris, the U.S. Commissioner of Education, said
“… our schools have been scientifically designed to prevent over education from happening.”
Former Chancellor of NYC public schools for eight years, Joel Klein, has learned his lesson. He explains in his article published in the June 2011 edition of the Atlantic Magazine that the senseless American education system must be gutted before it can be reformed.
Your children are being deliberately dumbed down by a public fool system.
NY Times article “Not only did Chinese students finish first on a highly recognized international standardized exam, but … The United States finished 17th in reading, 23rd in science and 31st in math”
Here are the rankings. http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/12/07/education/07education_graph.html?ref=education
Abraham Lincoln warned us:
“The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next.”
Thomas Jefferson wrote to Pierre S. Dupond de Nemours on April 24, 1816:
“Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day. Although I do not, with some enthusiasts, believe that the human condition will ever advance to such a state of perfection as that there shall no longer be pain or vice in the world, yet I believe it susceptible of much improvement, and most of all, in matters of government and religion; and that the diffusion of knowledge among the people is to be the instrument by which it is to be effected.”
God promised to forget the children of parents who forget the law of God, Hosea 4:6.
“I never let schooling interfere with my education.” — Samuel Clemens
PROPHETIC MARK OF THE BEAST is for children
- Marks have been on foreheads ever since Ezekiel 9:4 yet some people still adamantly vehemently absolutely insist that the mark of the beast is a physical etching of the skin and therefore it must be in the future.
- three times in the Bible, angels tell us that prophetic Beasts symbolize governments.
- The Old Testament references to marks that are on both the hand and forehead, none of which are physical marks, all involve the training of children. All of the Bible’s five occurrence of marks (called signs, words, tokens, law, and seals) that are on both the forehead and hand also mention the training of children.
THE OTHER KIND OF GENOCIDE
What about the threat of death by government? Ever since Herod massacred (Greek word apokteino is never used for government executions) the 2 year olds, pagan governments have required blood sacrifices. Hint: the 4 occurrences in the Old Testament of marks on heads and foreheads also mention the education of children. And the English word “killed” in Revelation 13:15 is translated from the same Greek word apokteino / abolish/eradicate/kill. But the word is never used for lawful executions. You will not be executed for refusing the mark. The beast’s intent is to abolish/eradicate/kill the resistance.
(Does the elimination of all three “rights of all mankind” qualify?)
And the U.S. military is still targeting children:
“It is better to tolerate the rare instance of a parent refusing to let his child be educated, than to shock the common feelings and ideas by the forcible transportation and education of the infant against the will of the father.” — Thomas Jefferson, Note to Elementary School Act, 1817
Here is a youtube story on American Education System. The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZJoCfgAEuE&feature=em-share_video_user
Dumbing Us Down by John Taylor Gatto, Former two-time New York Teacher of the Year, and his other book
Weapons of Mass Instruction by John Taylor Gatto
YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN
A HIGH SCHOOL ENDS AUTOMATIC PROMOTION, THEN …
Zero out of 44 students complete freshman year.
OBAMA ORDERS CHILDREN KILLED http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mvOU-czQnl8
1. Contra principia negantem non est disputandum. There can be no debate with one who denies fundamentals. Didn’t they teach you that in school?
2. The English word apostate comes from the Greek. It means failure to stand, or to stand away from.
* ~ ~ ~ *