You never qualified for a Social Security Card. In order to understand this you must first convince yourself that it is never a government function to take care of people.

Paupers are people supported at public expense. Even the Articles of Confederation say that paupers have the same rights as fugitives from justice.


read my essay on Welfare.

The application for a Social Security Number is only available to applicants eligible for programs funded by federal funds. Government has a right to regulate what it funds. But you enlisted into something much more serious. You changed your citizenship and became a ward of the government.

The Social Security Act, Section 205(c)(2)(B)(i)(II), requires applicants for Social Security Numbers to be an "applicant for or recipient of benefits under any program financed in whole or in part by Federal funds"

Socialism is unconstitutional. Socialism cannot recognize individual rights. Only indigent persons are eligible for programs funded by federal funds. Examples:

U.S. Supreme Court in Edwards v. California, 314 US 172, stated the common understanding of welfare: "...only persons who are presently destitute of property and without resources to obtain the necessities of life, and who have no relatives or friends able and willing to support them."

Busser v. Snyder, 37 ALR 1515:

Once you become a ward of the government, guess what?

Kitchens v. Steel, 112 F.Supp 383:

Are you a slave who has no way to support yourself? If you have a SSN, then the answer is yes, because you voluntarily confessed on a permanent irrevocable government record. YOU applied for benefits under a program funded by federal funds!

The Supreme Court in U.S. v Cruikshank case, 92 U.S. 542 at 551:

"It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government."

What did you sign that ensnared yourself to legalities that you didn't understand?

Throughout the history of mankind, slaves who want to stay with their children can give their children into slavery. Exodus 21:6.

Otherwise, Involuntary servitude remains unconstitutional.

People v. Shirley, 92 ALR 2d 413, indexed under the topic Poor Laws:

Parents have always had the authority to pledge their children as collateral for a debt.

You cannot be free until you pay your debt. The borrower is servant to the lender. By the way, the national debt is unpayable. What you bind on earth is bound in heaven so that the smoke of your torment shall rise forever and ever in the presence of the Lamb. But what you loose on earth is loosed in heaven. .

They don't tell you that a reasonable time is 20 days.

But not everyone can set themselves free.