“Your” SSN is not for identification. Social Security Cards and numbers were never intended for identification. Social Security Cards prior to 1972 contained a bold, red capitalized letters warning “NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION”. It is not for identification because everyone was suspicious that it was the Mark of the Beast.
What is the Mark of the Beast?
In the Bible, a beast symbolizes a government according to three angles (in Daniel 7:24, Daniel 8:20 and in Revelation 17:12).
In the Bible, the book of Revelation contains a prophecy. Revelation 13:17 says there will be a time when a “mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” would be required to buy or sell.
When the Social Security Act was being debated in 1935, everyone was suspicious that the SS card (mark and number) would eventually be used as the dreaded Mark. So the government lied to us and reassured everyone that it would never be used as identification. They even put the restriction on the card to reassure us. The Bible also says that Satan is a liar from the beginning.
Do you have a wage authorization number, issued by a government (beast) power, that allows you to sell your labor? Do you have a banking authorization number that allows you to buy or sell, or cash a paycheck? If you suspect that you have taken the Mark of the Beast, you should find out more. Read my article Will you Be Deceived Into the Mark of the Beast.
Not For Identification
Here are some government confessions that thy lied to us.
The Legislative history of the Privacy Act, Public Law 93-579, bottom of page 6944:
“The Social Security card states that it is not to be used for identification purposes. This proviso was initially included in the Social Security program to prevent reliance on the card for identification because the person could acquire several of them under several identities . . . “
769 F.2d 968: United States of America v. Jesus Amaya Quinteros:
“It is true, of course, that providing identification to the holder is not one of the primary purposes of Social Security cards. In fact, the Operation Procedure Manual of the Social Security Administration states that the Social Security card is not to be used for the purpose of identification. Nevertheless, the Social Security card is commonly accepted as an identification card. An expert for the Social Security Administration testified that the Administration frequently issues Social Security cards to elderly people for the purpose of providing identification for cashing checks. She further testified that the legend “Not for Identification Purposes” was dropped from the card in 1972 because individuals nevertheless were using the cards for identification purposes. We think this reflects the common understanding that Social Security cards are identification documents. The fact that an illegal market valued false Social Security cards for identification purposes further supports our conclusion that such cards are commonly accepted for identification within the meaning of section 1028(d)(1).
51 F.3d 288: United States of America, v. Mohammad Hassan Hammoude:
“because the cards were so often used for identification, the government removed a notice from the back of the cards that had stated that they were “Not for Identification Purposes.”
United States v. Abbouchi No. 05-50962, D.C. No. CR-05-00159-PA, footnote 4:
the Administration removed the “Not for Identification Purposes” legend from these cards in 1972 to reflect their emerging use as a form of identification. Id. The Fourth Circuit also cited legislative history for § 1028(a)(2) suggesting that Congress contemplated the statute would cover social security cards. 5 Congress has since amended § 1028(d)(3). See USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-177 § 603(3), 120 Stat. 192, 253 (2006).
The phrase “Ties that bind” refers to shared beliefs that are stronger than the beliefs that can separate us. But strong delusions have come upon the USA in the past 90 years that bind us to shared beliefs that will destroy us. These are the Lies That Bind. The Bible predicts an era when people will not be able to discern good from evil. Those times are now.
Have you lost control of your life because of government lies and regulations?
If you had known the Laws of Nature and the Laws of Nature’s God you would not have followed cleverly devised fables and been snared1. Even the Bible says “Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them.”
My articles explain fundamental laws that everyone ignores.
(2) Lie: Social Security Numbers are required. Yet, there is no law that requires you to get or have a SSN to live or work in the United States (More…).
(3) Lie: You “paid into” the Social Security system and they promised to give you some of it back in your old age. Yet, the Supreme Court says there is no SS trust fund (More…). You did not pay into the system (More…). All forms of welfare are socialism. Socialism will destroy us. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors’ wealth. Forced charity is not charity, it is theft. You have no right to participate in a system that forcibly collects money from your neighbor, and yourself, just so you can live more comfortably. Your society now takes care of social needs by a socialism that relies on force, fear and violence. It should be the other way around — you have a duty to love your neighbor as much as you love yourself — to take care of community’s social needs through a daily ministration that relies on a system of faith, hope, and charity.
(4) Lie:The U.S. Constitution requires you to be subject to federal laws. Yet, Vice President Thomas Jefferson reassured us that people in States were subject to only three federal laws, the three crimes mentioned in the Constitution, “and no other crimes whatever”. IF YOU ARE SUBJECT TO MORE THAN 3 FEDERAL LAWS3, I should think that you would want to know why.
(5) Lie: You are a citizen just because you were “born in the United States”. Yet, this is not what the 14th Amendment says. The Supreme Court ruled that you must also be subject to the jurisdiction thereof — “not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.”
(6) Lie: Marriage licenses are required to get married.
(7) Lie: Driver licenses are required to operate your family car on the road. (More…)
Other lies: All wages are taxable. The IRS is an agency of the United States. The Federal Reserve is federal. The money collected by the IRS pays to run the government. The Bill of Rights grants rights. Bankruptcy can impair the obligation of contracts.
CAN A LIE BIND?
“illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way, namely, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure. It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachment thereon.“
— The U.S. Supreme Court, Boyd v. United States, 116 US 616, Page 635
“Fraud vitiates every transaction and all contracts. Indeed, the principle is often stated, in broad and sweeping language, that fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters”
-– 37 Am Jur 2d, Section 8
“There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments.”
— U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. v. Throkmorton, 98 US 61 (in 1878). at bottom of page 64.
Beware: you must have proof of fraud, and the proof must be admissible in your court case.
FOOTNOTES
Suggestion: read the Supreme Court case Steward Machine co. v. Davis (1937) 301 US 548, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/301/548.html Start reading at the rebuttal to “employment is one so essential to the pursuit of happiness that it may not be burdened with a tax”.
2 “Gaslighting is a tactic in which a person or entity, in order to gain more power, makes a victim question their reality. It works much better than you may think. Anyone is susceptible to gaslighting, and it is a common technique of abusers, dictators, narcissists, and cult leaders. It is done slowly, so the victim doesn’t realize how much they’ve been brainwashed.”
— Stephanie Sarkis Post on Psychology Today. Gaslighting: Know It and Identify It to Protect Yourself
3. “The canon of construction which teaches that legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States”
— US Supreme Court in Foley Brothers v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281
The term “United States” may be used in any one of several senses. [1] It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. [2] It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States extends, or [3] it may be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution. – U.S. Supreme Court, Hooven & Allison Co. vs Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945)
The Buck Act extends federal jurisdiction to anyone receiving a federal benefit.
If you want to challenge the loss of your rights, I recommend an online law course for those who will fight against the powers-that-be. It has save me and it might just be your get-out-of-jail card. HowToWinInCourt.com
If you want to join me in pondering how the deep state infiltrators got into power, read my 32 page report that questions lawyer’s integrity.
==== ::::: ====
Steven D. Miller is a freelance writer producing informative Articles, blog posts, ghost writing, newsletters, web pages, case studies, white papers, reports, eBooks and high-density documentaries. He is available to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free.
Clark Kent is not going to show up to fight your never ending battle for Truth, Justice, and the American Way. But I will.
Biden’s plan to monitor bank accounts has been approved. Even Crypto Currency is not safe. The Bitcoin payment paid to hackers by Colonial Pipeline has been seized. Crypto currencies will soon be banned. See my essay The Beast’s Monetary Policy.
I know from my own experience that the IRS will lie, cheat and steal in order to destroy you. They taxed me twice for the same income. When I stood up against them, they fabricated evidence to use against me. They even taxed me for operating a coal mine that does not exist.
We were told that Biden’s plan was to tax the rich. See my essay on taxing the rich. The real answer is that they will monitor every transaction of every bank account over $600.
BANK BAIL – INs
As frightening as it is to deal with the IRS, banks can now seize your account whenever they mismanage their business.
It is their money, not yours. You are only a legal owner.
Their terminology “legal owner” did not show up in Black’s Law Dictionary until the 1979 edition. Notice that “the title may actually carry no rights to the property.”
Now with the IRS bullies running the show, what could possibly go wrong with Biden’s plan to monitor bank accounts?
Depositors in European Union countries have suffered bail-ins trying to save their failing banks.
Constitutional taxation is VERY different that what most people believe. President Thomas Jefferson, March 4, 1805, asked: “what farmer, what mechanic, what laborer, ever sees a tax-gatherer of the United States?”
NO Tax-the-rich scheme has ever worked. It always ends up taxing everyone.
Even the Income Tax Amendment was ratified to tax the bank interest earned by the wealthy. The Income Tax Amendment was ratified on the repeated assurance that it would never tax wages. Even the New York Times front page article announcing the first state to ratify the amendment (link) reassured everyone that it would not tax wages. (Because it does not tax wages. I do not have time to explain the proof here. But I will tell you that my wages were taxed for, unknown to me, an underground coal mine that I knew nothing about. Your IRS files will have something similar.)
The USA taxes its citizens where ever they are in the world. ONLY one other country does this. The US can do this because you are a permanent ward of the federal government. Have you waived your right to earn wages, thereby making your wages taxable?
The Federal Reserve Bank is not a government agency. Never was.
Senate Document 43. April 19, 1933.
One month after our lawful money was seized*, and before May 1st 1933 when it was required to be turned over for paper, the great legal minds of Washington published Senate Document 43 entitled “Contracts Payable in Gold.” On page 13 you will read:
” The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law, and subordinate to the necessities of the State. The fact that citizens, at a given time, may prefer specie to currency, or vice versa, can not prevent Congress from enacting those laws which it deems necessary to the maintenance of a proper monetary system. If the law makes specie and currency equivalent for purposes of payment, a failure to pay a given sum in specie, according to contract, cannot possibly beget an obligation to pay a greater sum in legal-tender notes, whatever premium men may choose to give for gold, when forced to obtain it for a specific purpose, or when impelled by a spirit of speculation, or by a distrust of Government. (Brown v. Welch, supra.)
While the courts cannot control our citizens’ preferences for one kind of money over another kind, or prevent them from giving a premium for the one or the other kind of money, when the fiscal affairs of the Government necessitate the adoption of a certain policy, expressed in constitutional legislative enactment, such as the maintenance of a monetary system consisting of specie and currency, to be acceptable interchangeably as to the value of the dollar, the courts should not give effect to a stipulation impugning the power of the legislature to make such laws, and should not apply those laws to the construction of contracts in such a way as to defeat the legitimate purpose of those laws, upon the enforcement of which the very existence of the Government may depend, or, at least, the aggregate well-being of the whole people is contemplated. “
If you want convincing proof that deep state infiltrators have overthrown your government, start with President Kennedy’s warning about secret societies’ monolithic and ruthless conspiracy. He asked for “your help in the tremendous task of alerting the American people.”
Here are some quotes from JFK’s “The President and the Press” speech to the Newspaper Publishers, 27 April 1961 (source)
“The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings”
“Today no war has been declared — and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack”
“We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence”
“It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations”
“… I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed. “
“… we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.”
JFK’s warning was only three months after Eisenhower’s farewell address warned us that
“…Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, …. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted.”
Unfortunately for us, this Presidential alarm about being dominated by secret societies was suppressed after the JFK assassination.
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1949:
“The real rulers of a nation are undiscoverable.”
— Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, quoted in an article “Globalists Run U.S., Says Sen. Malone” in the Chicago Daily Tribune, April 25, 1949, page 1
Conrad Hilton, hotel chain owner, 1952
This public service announcement by Conrad Hilton was published in the July 7th 1952 edition of Life magazine, on page 59. His message against the globalist information war was so urgent in 1952 that he ended his prayer “Be swift to save us Dear God, before the darkness falls”.
The next year, 1953, Conrad Hilton hosted the National Prayer Breakfast for our legislators. He had this poster prominently displayed. It didn’t help. They continued their monolithic and ruthless conspiracy to dominate us. In 1954 they passed a completely rewritten Income Tax Code to forever enslave you.
The darkness fell. Today’s deep state infiltrators will never allow light to have communion with darkness. Stand firm therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage.
Barack Obama speech to world leaders
at Brussels, Belgium, March 26, 2014, Obama rambled on comparing American ideals of the past, and historic European ideals based on the belief that
“ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign.”
He did not directly announce what side he was on, but he did say
“And for the international order that we have worked for generations to build …
The lock step march to the destruction of Locked-down America. Don’t be fooled. It is a lock step march to the Mark of The Beast.
Ben Franklin warned us that those who give up liberty to obtain safety deserve neither. Why do so many sheeple quietly march to their slaughter when told to do so by the foreign controlled World Health Organization? Join me in pondering the lies that enslave us.
Why does the controlled media proclaim that a global pandemic is killing too many people when only three-one-thousandths of one percent of people under age 65 die from (not just with) the disease — and more elderly die from falls than the disease?
Why have we destroyed Main Street USA, eliminated the middle class, indebted our children with $Trillions borrowed to bailout the obvious consequences of obedience to foolish rulers?
Lock Step CONSPIRACY?
ROCKEFELLER’S PLAN-DEMIC
The Rockefeller Foundation 2010 White Paper, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”, has a chapter entitled Lock Step with their plan to get us marching in their direction (unstated: to total domination by those who demand you surrender all your rights).
This May 2010 white paper examines possible future scenarios to take advantage of pandemics. Start with the chapter entitled Lock Step. Search for “pandemic”.
WHO white paper
A WORLD AT RISK advocated the advantages to their agenda of a plandemic.
Link — https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annual_report/GPMB_Annual_Report_English.pdf
Page 2: Acknowledgements “We extend our deep appreciation and thanks to the Director-General of the World Health Organization and to the President, World Bank Group for having co-convened the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB).”
Page 39: Progress indicator(s) by September 2020 “• The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two systemwide training and simulation exercises, including one covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.”
Is the second one also going to be a lethal respiratory pathogen?
Director-General of the World Health Organization
Just who is this Director-General of the World Health Organization that is so highly praised for co-inventing the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board?
The head of the World Health Organization is a radical communist, and a former member of a violent terrorist organization. According to the BBC (link: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-51720184), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director general of the WHO, started his career with membership in the Tigray People’s Liberation Front.
The Department of Homeland Security has this to say about TPLF:
“The TPLF qualifies as a Tier III terrorist organization… on the basis of its violent activities before it became part of the ruling coalition and the government of Ethiopia in May 1991,”
according to the Department of Homeland Security. — Link: https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Laws/TRIG/2014_Implementation_of_New_Discretionary_Exemption_for_Activities_or_Associations_Relating_to_TPLF.pdf
And here is a commentary about the military requirements to force compliance. https://www.globalresearch.ca/usa-plan-militarized-control-population/5713839
Welcome to your Novus Ordo Seclorum new world order.
Caravans of illegal immigrants are invited to invade your country, and politicians do nothing.
What could possibly go wrong?
We had a legal immigrant problem over one hundred years ago, but we also had common sense.
Teddy Roosevelt required immigrants to assimilate
It was common sense that “Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all.” — he went on to say we don’t have room for anyone else.
That’s right. In 1919 legal immigration was a problem because some would not assimilate. We did not have individual welfare programs then, yet everyone knew we did not have room for anyone else.
Teddy Roosevelt speech to the New York City Chamber of Commerce November 11, 1902:
“the traditional American self-reliance of spirit which makes them scorn to ask from the government, whether of State or of Nation, anything but a fair field and no favor; who confide not in being helped by others, but in their own skill, energy, and business capacity to achieve success. The first requisite of a good citizen in this Republic of ours is that he shall be able and willing to pull his weight that he shall not be a mere passenger, but shall do his share in the work that each generation of us finds ready to hand; and, furthermore, that in doing his work he shall show not only the capacity for sturdy self-help but also self-respecting regard for the rights of others.”
Socialism cannot recognize individual rights. You cannot covet your neighbor’s wealth and expect to have rights to your own wealth. Yet you accept welfare. Illegals who do not assimilate will have their way with you. You got what you deserve.
There are consequences to tolerating welfare. God’s laws will not be scorned. The Maxims of Law will not change just because you believe the socialists. There are consequences to your participation. Maxim of Law: Ex dolo malo non oritur actio. He has invited what has come, and he must accept it. Illegals will have their way with you.
Here are some articles warning us that illegals have an average of four criminal convictions.
2150 years ago the Greek historian Polybius wrote:
“But when a new generation arises and the democracy falls into the hands of the grandchildren of its founders, they have become so accustomed to freedom and equality that they no longer value them, and begin to aim at pre-eminence; and it is chiefly those of ample fortune who fall into this error. So when they begin to lust for power and cannot attain it through themselves or their own good qualities, they ruin their estates, tempting and corrupting the people in every possible way. And hence when by their foolish thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, democracy in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. For the people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch.”
— The Histories Of the Roman Republic 220-146 BC, Book 6, section 9
The Genocide Treaty, 78 UNTS 277, defines the crime of genocide, in time of peace or in time of war, as intent to destroy in whole or in part certain protected groups (national, ethnical, racial, or religious). Political groups ARE NOT PROTECTED FROM GENOCIDE. In the U.S., the Genocide of Political Enemies has become an acceptable policy of your government.
Your representatives in Congress represent you. Political Enemies are not protected from YOUR policy of Genocide.
Political enemies were once on the Genocide Treaty’s list of protected groups, but it was removed before the United States adopted it into our Criminal Laws 18 USC 1091 under Bill Clinton in 1994. But we did not adopt it word for word. We added lawyer weasel words to allow us to get away with domestic genocide.
The killing of all political enemies is acceptable according to this treaty.
If you don’t recognize the photo, it is at a National Socialist’s forced labor camp.
HOMELESS
When the eviction moratorium ends, millions will end up homeless. They will end up in resettlement work camps.
Our national debt is twice our annual income. We keep borrowing $Trillions from our children. Socialists now demand that we forgive college loans (spit in the faces of those who worked to pay their way through college), pay everyone’s health care, give them free money, house the caravans of illegal criminal invaders that Biden invited, etc. All these debts will come due soon.
When the national debt cannot be paid, what is planned for your future? Absconding debtors can be imprisoned. Once your assets are seized and you cannot make a debt payment, then you become a homeless absconding debtor. The concentration camps are ready. Work will set you free. But only if your labor, at prison wages, can pay off your debt.
(No, this is not for foreign refugee camps, notice the requirement for Social Security Numbers in paragraph 7-16 — and don’t miss the term “reeducation” in chapter 8 and Appendix K)
You can also read the CIVILIAN INMATE LABOR PROGRAM, Army Regulation 210-35 http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/r210_35.pdf
Welcome to your Novus Ordo Seclorum Secular New World Order.
Any questions?
THEY CANNOT DO THIS TO US, you proclaim.
Well, guess what. You already volunteered just by claiming to be a U..S. citizen.
The citizenship oath of allegiance already requires you to provide unlimited labor for the rest of your life. An oath of citizenship, according to the Department of Homeland Security 8 CFR 337, is a commitment to
“perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; …”.
This is unlimited perpetual slavery. Your forced labor is collateral for the national debt. Your debt to society must be paid. Your allegiance was turned over to the creditors (by lawyers). You are permanently obligated until you pay your debt to society.
Arbeit Macht Frei Work will set you free, but only if you can pay off your debts at prison wages.
There is an old rock song from 1971 that advises, ” Tax the rich, feed the poor, till there are rich no more.” (I’d Love to Change the World, by Ten Years After). Throughout the history of class warfare, this has been every promise of socialism.
Four years before the Russian Revolution put the Bolsheviks in power, the USA Income Tax Amendment was ratified in 1913. The only reason it was ratified is because everyone was assured, over and over again, that it would only tax the bank account interest of the rich, and it would not tax wages. And now everyone believes the lie. More about this later.
But first I want to point out the obvious.
Socialism cannot recognize individual rights.
Socialist countries exist because the leaders are always corrupt.* That is how they got their power. That is how they stay in power. Socialist leaders will stay rich, while they exploit everyone else.
And he is pushing for a global minimum tax. Taxation without representation.
We cannot possibly keep borrowing money from our children and expect to have a future. The net worth of all American taxpayers is less than half of our debt, and nothing is done to pay off the debt. Our children will grow up destitute in the land their fathers built from sea to shining sea.
1934 Chicago Tribune cartoon mocking the FDR socialists’ plan
Those who lust for power will drive others back into perfect savages.*
HISTORY of traditional values, which never tax the rich
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wealth.
Paul repeated King David’s warning that government charity would be a snare to trap you. Romans 11:9
After Christ told us that the Kingdom of God was at hand, and right before he told his followers that he appoints unto them a kingdom; he said unto them that the kings of the Gentiles (pagans) exercise lordship over others so that they will be called benefactors. But you shall not be so. Luke 22:25.
Galatians 5:15 But if you bite one another, you yourself will be consumed.
Second Peter 2:14 Your covetous practices shall curse your children. [And today we have burdened our children with unpayable debt that will enslave them. By the way, slavery in the Bible was a 20% income tax during a time of national crisis. Genesis 47:23-26.]
Second Thessalonians 3:10 if any would not work, neither should he eat.
Second Thessalonians 3:12 we command and exhort by our Lord Jesus Christ, that with quietness they work, and eat their own bread.
No one has to provide for you. Why do you want laws that force others to provide for you? This is theft and extortion. In Genesis 3:19 the unchanging God of the Bible requires you to earn your bread from the sweat of your face. This principle was still true when Abraham Lincoln gave his second Inaugural address, March 4, 1865: “It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces…” That’s right. Forced welfare contributions are just as immoral as slavery.
Two systems, pick one: Force, fear and violence Faith, hope and charity.
Don’t confuse government welfare systems with charity. One is done by forcing your neighbors to give; the other is done with love. It is your duty to love your neighbor and be your brother’s keeper. Forcing your neighbor to give is not charity — it is socialism. No form of collectivism can recognize individual rights. If the neighbor cannot give, then their bank account will be seized, their wages garnished, they will be evicted from their home by brutal force and their home sold to collect the tax. This is force, not love. Learn how to spot the difference.
HISTORY OF THE INCOME TAX to tax the rich
New York Times August 3, 1909 front page article announcing the first state to ratify the Income Tax Amendment said:
“The only interruption to his speech was a query by Representative Glover… – who wanted to know if the amendment would affect salaries.”
If you have the same question, then read the response. (link https://www.NotFooledByGovernment.com/essay-files/NYT-front-page-article-on-tax-8-03-1909.pdf ) You may safely ignore the part of the answer that said “unless Congress passed a law including salaries.” because four years later the Senate debates show the intent of Congress.
Senate ratification debates in the Congressional Record, August 28 1913, Senator Lawrence Y. Sherman, on page 3843, debating the income tax amendment, insisted that the word “income” referred only to earnings on savings accounts:
“The savings from the income by professional effort or by any form of skilled labor or unskilled hand becomes property. At the end of any given period that saving is a principal, and any income derived from it is an income from property, not an income from the earning capacity or the personal ability of the taxpayer in question… Those investments that produce an income from a property I think are properly to be distinguished from those arising from the earning capacity of the individual.”
Also on page 3843 Senator Cummins :
“I assume that every lawyer will agree with me that we cannot legislatively interpret the meaning of the word ‘income’. That is purely a judicial matter. We cannot enlarge the meaning of the word ‘income’. The word ‘income’ had a well-defined meaning before the amendment … If we could call anything income that we pleased, we could obliterate all the distinction between income and principal…. Congress can not affect the meaning of the word ‘income’ by any legislation whatsoever…. obviously the people of this country did not intend to give to Congress the power to levy a direct tax upon all the property of this country without apportionment.”
That’s right. There is no apportioned direct tax on anyone. Any income derived from savings accounts becomes taxable, because collecting interest is a government granted privilege.
* Perfect Savages
2150 years ago the Greek historian Polybius wrote:
“But when a new generation arises and the democracy falls into the hands of the grandchildren of its founders, they have become so accustomed to freedom and equality that they no longer value them, and begin to aim at pre-eminence; and it is chiefly those of ample fortune who fall into this error. So when they begin to lust for power and cannot attain it through themselves or their own good qualities, they ruin their estates, tempting and corrupting the people in every possible way. And hence when by their foolish thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, democracy in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. For the people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch.”
— The Histories Of the Roman Republic 220-146 BC, Book 6, section 9
And 2000 years ago Plutarch said “It is truly said that the first destroyer of the liberties of a people is he who gave them bounties and largesse. “
If you want to challenge the loss of your rights, I recommend an online law course for those who will fight against the powers-that-be. It has save me and it might just be your get-out-of-jail card. HowToWinInCourt.com
Steven D. Miller is a freelance writer producing informative Articles, blog posts, ghost writing, newsletters, web pages, case studies, white papers, reports, eBooks and high-density documentaries. He is available to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free. Contact him at Steven.Miller@LibertyContentWriter.com
Under the U.S. Constitution, a wife had no legal rights. A wife’s rights did not come from government. Her covering is her husband. Government had no right to interfere with a man’s family except for (1) extreme cruelty* that endangered the life of a wife or child, or (2) children would be educated at public expense if parents failed to educate their children to his station in life.
But if you got a marriage license, daddy government is your covering. Ask your daddy for whatever legal rights they want to grant to you.
Under the U.S. Constitution a marriage is for life. It cannot be divorced. That’s right. There is no such thing as a living ex-wife or ex-husband.
The U.S. Supreme Court determined in Maynard v. Hill 125 U.S. 205, at pages 211 to 215 that marriage is to be upheld because “marriage is a relation for life.” (this refers to real marriage, not the divorceable type of marriage that needs a license).
But you waived your right to marry by getting a marriage license. If you had managed to keep your rights the answer to your question is found in American law dictionaries :
In the Bible divorce only refers to living separately. Also notice that nowhere in the Bible does the word divorce cancel a marriage.
The Latin word Capitis is a head covering. Diminutio is a taking away, loss or deprivation.
A Christian man is the covering for his family. See First Corinthians 11.
A right cannot be licensed. A marriage license application is a confession that you have no right to marry.
One you confess that you have no right to your family, a civil Roman government is your covering.
Notice in all cases that a man’s family rights are lost. Only in the more severe cases are other legal rights forfeited.
Originally answered by Steven Miller, March 27, 2019.
* FOOTNOTE
According to Black’s Law Dictionary, first edition:
Also related to the topic of cruelty: The husband’s Covering was a wife’s complete protection. Men created a government to help them protect their families. A man is responsible for the crimes committed by his wife. A wife cannot be arrested. A man is to be arrested for the crimes of his wife, so that the wife can stay home and care for the children. Therefore a man has a duty to correct his wife with whatever force is necessary. (By the way, men also have a duty to correct the government he created.)
For those not familiar with the Mark of the Beast of the Bible:
A symbolic “Beast” is a kingdom (according to angels in Daniel 7:24, Daniel 8:20 and in Revelation 17:12). Today we would use the word government.
Daniel 7’s exceedingly dreadful final beast kingdom tramples down the earth, takes away the dominion of other governments, makes war with the saints and prevails against them.
The final government controls the world’s monetary system such that no one can buy or sell without government permission (except for those in Revelation 15:2 who are victorious over the mark). What are the chances that you already have a banking authorization number from an exceedingly dreadful final world government ?
The Mark is an identification needed to buy or sell in the final economic system, either a badge, name (authority), or number– The Biblical book of Revelation at chapter 13, verse 17; “And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” (King James Version)
You may have questioned if marks such as quantum dot tattoos in the skin have something to do with the Mark of The Beast.
The quantum dot vaccine was invented at MIT to deliver vaccines using a patch of microneedles to invisibly encode vaccination history directly into the skin. Their nanocrystals leave fluorescent mineral tatoos long after the vaccine needles have dissolved. These marks can be viewed with infrared cameras, or cell phone cameras with special filters. Some people speculate that there will be three numbers of six digits each.
My thoughts in support of Quantum Dot vaccines being the Mark:
There is a prophecy in Revelation 18:4 where a voice from heaven says, “come out of her my people [and] receive not of her plagues.” Then in verse 23 “for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.”(the original Greek word that the King James translators translated into the 1611 English word “sorceries” was the Greek word pharmakeia — which we would translate into today’s English word pharmacy) — For by thy pharmacy are all nations deceived.
Bill Gates has already told us that digital certificates of immunity would be needed to facilitate the global re-openning of the economy after the COVID lockdowns.
And, of course, the economic system has been under Satanic control ever since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
My thoughts in rebuttal of Quantum Dot vaccines being the Mark:
Many people insist that the Mark has to be an implant in the skin or a tattoo in the skin, or at least a breaking of the skin. I don’t believe it. There is no Biblical requirement for a physical breaking of the skin.
The King James Version translated the Greek word “epi” to the English word “in” or “upon” for the following marks: • in their foreheads (Revelation 7:3) • his mark upon their foreheads, (Revelation 20:4) • or in their hands (Revelation 20:4) • in their right hand (Revelation 13:16) • in their foreheads (Revelation 13:16) • written in their foreheads (Revelation 14:1). The word “epi” is usually translated as “upon”. The King James Version translated the word ‘epi’ both ways in Revelation 20:4. We get our English word “epidermis” from the Greek. We also get our English word “hypodermic” from the Greek. You would never confuse the two English words. Epi-dermis is upon the skin, hypo-dermic is under the skin. In EVERY occurrence of the beast’s mark in your Bible, the mark is epi (upon) the hand and forehead. It is never hypo in the skin.
Many people claim that the mark must be a mark physically in the skin because the English word “Mark” can refer to a physical mark. Quantum Dot Vaccine would certainly qualify. We will examine this possibility below.
There is no Biblical requirement for a physical breaking of the skin. But there may be a symbolic breaking of the skin. After all, the word “covenant”, at least in the Old Testament, refers to a cutting of the skin. And in the New Testament in Acts7:8 the cutting of circumcision is called a covenant, and Hebrews 12:24 covenant and blood are mentioned together. The word “testament” can imply a cutting of the skin, as in Matthew 26:28, Luke 22:20, and 1 Corinthians 11:25 referring to Christ’s blood.
MORE THOUGHTS
The Satanic controlled economy has worked with debt currencies since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. A central bank is the fifth plank of the Communist Manifesto. Communism cannot recognize individual rights.
And we know that credit scores will require government approval of your social media interactions. Just like they do in China today. — So that by 2030 you will need a biometric method to log into the internet. The International Monetary Fund is developing a plan to track your web history to determine credit scores. Download Link: (https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WP/2020/English/wpiea2020161-print-pdf.ashx)
Right Hand or Forehead.
Some people insist that the phrase “hand and forehead” refers to manual work and mental work, therefore taking the mark only refers to working for the beast. I don’t believe it.
Some people insist that it has to be a clearly visible mark or tattoo of Satan’s protection, just as God’s mark protected Cain when he was evicted from Eden, and just as others were marked for protection as in Ezekiel 9:4-6.
Others suggest that the phrase “hand and forehead” refers to acceptance and obedience to the beast. • Or allegiance to the beast. • Or ownership by the beast. • Or saluting the beast authority. • Or simply a mental acceptance and a signature.
Let’s study the Bible and figure out what interpretations make sense and what interpretations can be dismissed.
The last digit in 666 is the word stigma, which comes from a meaning more-than-a-handful. Although the Greek word `stigma’, translated as the last 6 in the number 666 (666= chi-xi-stigma) , it can mean prick (as well as a reference to branding as a mark of ownership) and although the Greek word `charagma’, translated into the English word “mark”, can mean etching (or a badge of servitude), this is not necessarily proof that the mark has to be an implant.
The English word “Mark” refers to a physical mark. • Although it refers to a physical mark, the Greek word Stigma can refer to physical marks that are also designations of ownership, as in a rancher branding his cattle, or an artist signing his work. I have already written about how a Social Security Card is indeed a certificate of ownership. • The English word “Mark” can also mean a scar, as in Galatians 6:17 “…I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.” This is translated from the Greek word `stigma‘, which is not the word “Mark” used in Revelation. Stigma in Strong’s Concordance is defined as “a mark incised or punched for recognition of ownership, i.e. scar of service:-mark”. Notice that its primary meaning of this “stigma” physical mark is as a designation of ownership. Again, the word stigma is the third six in 666. The Greek word for “Mark” in the eight occurrences in Revelation, is the Greek word `charagma‘ (Strong’s G5480) which means an etching or a badge of servitude. The extent of God’s wrath leads us to believe that this is something extraordinary. But grammatically, there is no reason to suspect that this is anything more advanced than a badge, or an ID card — or just a number as allowed by Revelation 13:17. The mark might eventually involve an etching of the skin, as a tattoo or an implant, but I don’t see where the Bible requires it. A Social Security Card already fits this prophecy. A number issued by a foreign power already qualifies you to buy and sell, and none of the other Biblical marks in the right hand or forehead refer to a tattoo or scar or implant. The only other occurrence of the word `charagma‘ in the Bible is translated into the word `graven’ in Acts 17:29.
Forehead symbols
Bus drivers, tea brokers and military all have engraved marks on their forehead as their authority to present themselves in public as representatives of their superiors. In the Bible, the Greek word for authority exousia comes from the root word exon which is the right to present oneself in public. An engraved etching at the forehead has always been a sign of servitude, presenting to the public the master’s authority. The original purpose of the engraved etching was to allow a slave to go to the market and conduct business for his master. The etching was often just an impression of the master’s family seal baked in clay. A badge has always been a symbol of servitude. Today, an ID card in your right hand serves the same purpose as an engraved etching at the forehead.
Do you have a mark, name or number to present yourself in commerce? Such as a banking authorization number to conduct banking? Or a wage authorization number to sell your labor? If so, it is too late to worry about a vaccination. You should have already “come out of her my people [and] receive not of her plagues.”
Fast forward to today: you could be detained if you cannot show ID, and merchants might not conduct commerce without proof that you have some master’s authority to exist. In today’s commercial law this is known as a presentment warranty. As today’s badge of servitude, the Social Security Card, or ID obtained with it, certainly serves this same purpose.
Just like the National Socialists of 1930’s Europe, you will need a mark to enter the marketplace. But this time The wine of the wrath of God shall be poured out, undiluted, into the cup of his indignation and the smoke of their torment shall rise forever, whosoever receives the mark.
And I always recommend an online law course for those who will fight against the powers-that-be. It has save me and it might just be your get-out-of-jail card. HowToWinInCourt.com
— ===== ==== ===== —
Steven D. Miller is a freelance writer producing informative Articles, blog posts, newsletters, web pages, case studies, white papers, reports, eBooks and high-density documentaries. He is available to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free. Contact him at Steven.Miller@LibertyContentWriter.com
