Yearn to breathe free

Some people yearn to breathe free, but not everyone.

Some people want to live in a free country.

  • “Timid men prefer the calm of despotism” — according to Thomas Jefferson, April 24, 1796, Letter to Phillip Mazzei.
  • Those who give up liberty to obtain safety deserve neither — according to Ben Franklin, November 11, 1755; Reply to the Governor.  This is inscribed on a plaque in the stairwell of the Statute of Liberty.
  • Some prefer the tranquility of servitude to the contest for liberty — according to Samuel Adams, speech at the Pennsylvania State House, 1 August 1776. In the words of Samuel Adams: “crouch down and lick the hands which feed you”.
  • “Those who walk submissively will say there is no cause for concern” — according to the U.S. Supreme Court in Laird v. Tatum, 408 US 1, page 28.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court said “the use of identification papers are routine matters under totalitarian regimes, yet abhorrent in the United States…” — Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 378 U.S. 500.

A right cannot be taxed.  Once you pay for a right, you have waived your right. If, as a 14th Amendment citizen, you surrender your right(s) to someone who purports to exercise a duty that he is not expressly authorized to perform, and in the process denies you a right provided by law, he violates the Klu Klux Klan Act of 1871.

Recent protests often chant in protest “I can’t breathe”. They claim that they yearn to breathe free. They claim that they are peacefully assembled to petition for redress of grievance, yet the protesters have no right to complain.

The Supreme Court’s words “cannot complain” means you cannot
have standing in any court to complain that you waived your rights.

If you cooperate with the boot on your face, a judge can legitimately say that you volunteered. Estopple waives your right to complain.

Every Law Dictionary will tell you the civil laws reduce an ungrateful freeman to his condition of slavery. Libertinum ingratum leges civiles in pristinam servitutem redigunt.

Adam and Eve were condemned for being deceived. You have a duty to God to avoid deception.

Cowards have their place in the Lake of Fire — according to Revelation 21:8. God gave you a free-will.  You rejected God. You rejected Christ who delivered us from Caesar.

The rest of us will stand firm in the liberty wherewith Christ has set us free.

 

Those who receive not a love for the truth shall receive strong delusion that they should believe a lie.
None are so hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters

Any questions?

Supply Chain shortages?

Did the supply chain cause shortages? Packed ports are waiting to deliver the goods, but regulations prohibit efficient distribution.
6.2% is the highest inflation in 37 years. Inflation has hit everything, including commodities. But it hasn’t affected the price of gold.
Why? Answer: The inflation is caused by suppressing the supply. The government boot is on the neck of every productive activity in America.
There are people who want a worldwide government. The must first destroy every government. They have deep-state infiltrators in every government, working in what JFK called “a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy“.

THEY MUST CREATE SHORTAGES SO THE U.S. CAN BE MERGED WITH COMMUNIST COUNTRIES.  This has been their stated intent ever since 1953. Comrades, pay attention. In 1953 Norman Dodd’s was the Research Director for the Reece Congressional Committee to investigate the activities of “charitable” foundations.

Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation:

“Mr. Dodd, all of us here at the policy making level of the foundation have at one time or another served in the OSS [ the Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner of the CIA ] or the European Economic Administration, operating under directives from the White House. We operate under those same directives…The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”

Watch CBSnews.com video Packed Ports and Empty Shelves.

YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN

 

 

reduced to Ignorance and Vice

Here is a quote by Samuel Adams on tyrants reducing people to ignorance and vice, to keep them from prevailing against government.
Samuel Adams, Boston Gazette, October 5, 1772:
“It is in the Interest of Tyrants to reduce the People to Ignorance and Vice. For they cannot live in any Country where Virtue and Knowledge prevail. The Religion and public Liberty of a People are intimately connected; their Interests are interwoven, they cannot subsist separately; and therefore they rise and fall together. For this Reason it is always observable, that those who are combined to destroy the People’s Liberties, practice every Art to poison their Morals.”

Climate summit

The world’s elite meet at a UN Climate Summit in Glasgow, Scotland to determine how much carbon tax to impose on the most stringent pollution-regulated societies. While the world’s worst carbon pollution countries (China and India) are granted impunity.

And how come the elite are investing in the corporations that trade in carbon credits?

Satellite data show that year-to-year-average temperature highest highs have risen  0.12 degree per decade.. See chart below.

But in mankind’s existence on planet earth we know that prehistoric villages have garbage dumps with fish bones that grew in oceans that were 6 degrees higher than they are today. We can determine water temperatures trends of cold blooded fish by measuring the growth marks on their ear otolith (similar to growth rings on trees). Do I need to mention that no humans were blamed for the Ice Age melting?

And a thousand years ago, Monastery records from Denmark show that they purchased warm water fish. And tax records in Scandinavia also prove fishermen were selling warm water fish like anchovies.

NOAA boldly stated that 2014 was the hottest year on record by seven one-hundredth of a degree Fahrenheit. But to claim this they had to ignore satellite data, they had to ignore that this is greater than the margin of error in their instruments, and they had to violate the NASA 1990 policy that “Satellite analysis of upper atmosphere is more accurate, and should be adopted as the standard way to monitor temperature change.”

Do NOT believe convenient lies about manmade greenhouse gas, until oceans are six degrees warmer. Six degrees is a huge rise in ocean temperatures. Why can’t the Chicken Little politicians leave us alone until then? Answer: THEY MUST CREATE SHORTAGES SO THE U.S. CAN BE MERGED WITH COMMUNIST COUNTRIES.  This has been their stated intent ever since 1953. Comrades, pay attention.

In 1953 Norman Dodd’s was the Research Director for the Reece Congressional Committee to investigate the activities of “charitable” foundations.

Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation:

“Mr. Dodd, all of us here at the policy making level of the foundation have at one time or another served in the OSS [ the Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner of the CIA ] or the European Economic Administration, operating under directives from the White House. We operate under those same directives…The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”

Global warming occurs in natural cycles that have nothing to do with mankind’s greenhouse gases.

  • One of these natural cycles was the prehistoric global warming that occurred when the ice age melted more than 10,000 years ago. Mankind had nothing to do with it.
  • A cycle called the “Warm Atlantic Period” was from 5000BC to 3700 BC. In the Early Bronze Age.
  • The Northern Hemisphere was warmer than it is now during the “Holocene Climate Optimum” which ended almost 4,000 years ago. The Carbon Dioxide concentration was lower but the temperature was higher.
  • And a “Little Ice Age” followed the “Medieval Warm Period”.
  • The change in temperatures precedes by about 100 years the change in climate Carbon Dioxide. (according to a paper published in the journal Geology 33(1): pages 33-36)
  • The change in temperatures since 1870 closely follows sun spot activity.

With all the alleged “science” about the topic, why is it that no one will step forward and specify what the global temperature should be? And why cannot anyone specify what the Carbon Dioxide concentration should be?

Of the scientists who actually subscribe to the various research journals on global climate, more than 20 to one are skeptical of “theories” about manmade global warming.

And, by the way, temperature drives CO2, not the other way around.

The U.S. Government only funds research that proves climate change. And politicians impose green alternative sources that cannot work.

And now, electric cars are being promoted as a cure to global warming. Electric cars are not the answer to a carbon-free footprint.  Energy cannot be created or destroyed. The power must come from somewhere. A power source sufficient enough to replace gasoline powered cars does not exist.  There is not enough hydroelectric, nuclear, solar, wind or geothermal to “solve” the false narrative. The electric grid must rely on fossil fuels. The chicken littles’ narrative will crash full speed into the jagged cliff of reality.

The electric utilities do not have sufficient capacity to power electric cars. California has brown out in August because air conditioners overload their capacity.  The February 2021 Texas blackout killed 57 people and caused $195 Billion in damage. The Electric Utility companies in Texas are regulated by the misnamed Energy Reliability Council.

Home overload

The vast majority of homes have a 200 Amp, 240 volt electrical service from their utility. This is 48 killoWatts.  A kilowatt is 1,000 watts.  Your main circuit breaker will trip when overloaded. As a comparison to gasoline power, your homes maximum power use is 64 Horsepower.

Electric car chargers are available from 16Amps to 50 Amps at 240 volts, which is up to 12kW (16 Horsepower).  When we plug in our 1.1kW microwave, 1.5kW hair dryer, while using the 3kW watts the most modest electric heated homes require to be heated, the 4 kW water heater (or the 8 to 36kW for a tankless water heater — typically 16kW). And electric clothes dryers are average 3kW, but some models can be up to 5.kW. An oven’s heat element is 4kW watts, but the entire range can vary from 8.5kW to 12 kW.

No one will spend $40,000+ on solar panels.

Utility overload

When suburban families arrive home from work at 5:30, plug their cars in, turn up the thermostat, take a warm shower, put a load of laundry in the dryer, turn on the oven — guess what happens. Your utility transformer also powers your neighbor’s homes. It will trip it’s circuit breaker.

The local utility’s substation will overload when several homes on your block plug in an electric car charger.

Apartment dwellers will be the first to trip their transformers because the electrical load calculations in the National Electrical Code allowed a “diversity factor” assuming that not everyone will use their high-demand appliances simultaneously.

Energy Tax

And don’t forget that electric cars will be taxed by the mile, which means that government will track your every movement.

And don’t forget that Obama promised that his carbon “cap and trade” solution will cause electricity costs to skyrocket.

 

YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN

My article on the globalist agenda where I show statistics on the childhood asthma rates and air pollution.

 

When will the United States disappear?

The United States does not appear in the end-times Bible prophecy. The United States will disappear.

BEASTS in Prophecy

Throughout Bible prophecy, angels tell us that beasts symbolize governments (Daniel 7:23, and in Revelation 17:17, and Revelation 19:19). DIVINE interpretation, from an angel, in Daniel 7:23 equates Daniel’s final beast with a final world kingdom. Not necessarily an individual king or antichrist. The word “antichrist” does not appear in the book of Revelation.

Revelation chapter 13 mentions two beasts at the end-times. The first beast that is mentioned in Revelation 13 resembles, except for the missing eagle wings, the fourth “exceedingly dreadful” beast of Daniel 7. The second beast that is mentioned in Revelation 13 causes all to give the Mark of The Beast to buy or sell.

The ten horn beast of Revelation 13:1 has all attributes of the beasts in Daniel 7.

In Revelation 13 an endtime confederation of Daniel’s beasts (like unto a leopard-bear-lion with 7 heads and 10 horns – with the notable exception of whatever nation is symbolized by the missing eagle wings that were on the British Lion) has been assimilated by Daniel’s fourth exceedingly dreadful (Dan 7:19) iron beast, that will to take away the dominion of other beast powers (Dan 7:12), consume and trample down the whole earth and break it to pieces (verse 23). In Daniel 7:21 and Revelation 13:7 this beast kingdom has influence over all nations, and overcomes saints.

Will we be absorbed into the Gog-Magog nation?

The United States is the world’s largest debtor nation. How soon will we become a Marxist nation? Karl Marx said his goal was to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.

There are people that want a worldwide government. They have put deep-state infiltrators in every government. They are Marxists. Yes, there is an end-time confederation of beast powers.

Biden’s handlers are Marxists. They will push their Cloward-Piven agenda until we default on a bond payment. Then the Communist Chinese (the world’s largest creditors) comes to collect their collateral.

cartoon entitled “Planned Economy or Planned Destruction?” was from April 20, 1934 Chicago Tribune, right after they took our gold, and while the Social Security Act was being debated.

On September 23, 2021, President Joseph Biden announced his intention to nominate Professor Saule Omarova to be the next Comptroller of the Currency. She is Russian. She graduated from Moscow State University on a Lenin Scholarship.

  • She wants the Federal Reserve Bank (which is a private corporation) to determine the federal minimum wage.
  • She wants to bankrupt oil, coal and gas industries. (more…)
  • She wants to eliminate banks (more….)

What could possibly go wrong? The United States will disappear from history.

YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN MY ARTICLE

Banks are the Enemy of Capitalism.

Recommended Book

Give Me Liberty, Not Marxism by LTC Robert L. Maginnis

Give Me Liberty, Not Marxism examines what current American leaders like President Joe Biden and his globalist allies intend for America and the world, an outcome that may well usher in the prophetic end times. The evidence for this possible result comes from an objective review of the histories of past Marxist- regimes, accounts that are juxtaposed with the contemporary political proposals by those who seek a global “Great Reset” that could produce a radically different America which becomes subordinate to a godless, totalitarian one-world government ruled by the Chinese Communist Party.

 

The Coming Collapse

The Coming Collapse
by Steven D. Miller

The middle class was eliminated by the COVID lockdowns, yet the stock market and the real estate market are booming. Congress borrowed $Trillions for COVID relief and bailouts. The Federal Reserve monetized much of the debt but there was no trickle-down to the middle class. This influx of cash had to go somewhere. It caused a boom in the real estate markets and stock markets.

AND Now it is Bubble time.

● Real Estate Bubble.
● Housing Bubble.
● Stock market Bubble.
● Debt Bubble.
● Inflation.

Pop. Pop. Pop. Pop.

AND THEN all the world’s reserve currency dollars will come home from all the world’s banks, but we do not have the gold to redeem them. What happens then?

HOUSING BUBBLE

The eviction moratorium keeps the residential rental vacancy rate near zero. So rental prices of the few available rentals are sky high.

Prepare now for all the humanity when the moratorium ends. Your poor, huddled masses, the wretched refuse, the homeless, tempest-tossed will be at your doorstep demanding help. For the price of a bullet some will get whatever they want. Just look at what is happening in South Africa.

We were warned 2150 years ago when democracies create among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, they degenerate into perfect savages. (More)

When the eviction moratorium ends, those residential landlords who have not been paying their mortgage will be foreclosed by their banks.

STOCK MARKET

If you were interested in investing in productivity, it makes no sense to invest until prices drop back down to around 10 to 15 times earnings. America should be actually making things, but all that went offshore with the 1990s free trade nonsense.

By the way, free trade was never the intent of the U.S. Constitution. The government was to be funded by imposts, duties and excise taxes. Never by direct tax except during war. Read my article The Constitution Requires a Balanced Budget.

DEBT BUBBLE

Ever since we started the Social Security program in the mid 1930’s we keep raising the debt limit to overspend. We borrow by issuing Treasury bonds with “the full faith and credit of the United States”. This means our spending money is borrowed from our children who must repay. Our assets and our forced labor are the collateral for the debt. Communist China is our largest creditor. What could possibly go wrong?

And don’t miss my article Banks are the Enemy of Capitalism.

CONSPIRACY THEORY?

Believe it or not, there are people who want a worldwde government. These deep-state infiltrators are in all governments. To get to their global domination, they must first destroy all existing governments.

You might have noticed that the middle class was destroyed by the COVID lockdown. And our children must now repay all the borrowing promoted by these deep-state infiltrators. The Bible warned you that covetous practices will curse your children.

AND, yes. Children are collateral for the National Debt. In 1994 the Globalists demanded more U.S. collateral for their loan guarantees, so we signed a trade treaty (The GATT treaty — General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) requiring children to be enumerated at birth.

● The Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Public Law 103-465. (section 742 starts on page 202 of the PDF)
● passed into law by HR 5110

COVID Plandemic overspending

  • $ 396 Billion CORONAVIRUS PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT. Not including ongoing adjustments to limits on discretionary budget authority.
  • $192 Billion FAMILIES FIRST CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE ACT
  • $2 Trillion CORONAVIRUS AID, RELIEF, AND ECONOMIC SECURITY ACT (CARES ACT)
  • PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM AND HEALTH CARE ENHANCEMENT ACT includes: $321 Billion in 2020, $60 Billion in loan guarantees, $10 Billion “economic injury” loans, $75 Billion in supplemental appropriations
  • $25 Billion for COVID tests, and $62 Billion for Small Business Administration’s expenses.
  • $2 Billion for Coronavirus-Related Supplemental Funding to health centers.
  • not including $651 Billion in tax breaks.

This borrowing was just for COVID lockdown consequences, it does not include the $3.5 Trillion spending bill, nor the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill — of which 6% actually goes to infrastructure (and the rest goes to the Cloward-Piven Marxist agenda). And the infrastructure funds will not be going to protect infrastructure against hacking or EMP.

And Social Security “Reserves” are actually loans that Congress “promised” to repay, but even if you count on the repayments, Social Security will be gone in 15 years.

What could possibly go wrong?

FINAL COLLAPSE

It might start with a natural disaster, such as a cold snap that shutdown Texas last winter, or a volcano erupting, or civil unrest like 2020. Or the overdue great earthquake that destroys the West Coast.

Or it could start with massive hacking of infrastructure, or a plandemic just like COVID but with a strand of HIV attached. The deep state will bring down America and then present only one option: their world government.

Any of the following will also destroy us:
● shutdown our electric grids by hacking
● shutdown our pipelines so no trains, planes or trucks can deliver food into cities.
● North Korea can launch an EMP strike over us, even from false flagged ships
● China can sink our aircraft carriers with their hypersonic missiles

Then China will invade Taiwan, North Korea will invade South Korea, Iran will destroy Israel.

Then America will surrender to deep state’s Martial Law and we are off to the concentration camps, discussed below. Our forced labor will repay our debtors.

HUGE DEFAULT

There is a huge default coming. Prepare for the concentration camps. Now is the time to start networking with like-minded patriots to prepare for the social needs of your collapsed society. If you can meet your social needs then you will not be forced to beg for benefits that the world government offers. Just like it was when Christians were told in Second Corinthians 6 to be ye separate.

Concentration camps are already planned. A copy of the U.S. Army Field Manual FM 3-39.40 INTERNMENT AND RESETTLEMENT OPERATIONS is available at http://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf

Don’t think that this Army Field Manual is for oversees refugee camps. Notice that Social Security Numbers are needed to register the prisoners. And don’t miss the terminology “reeducation”.

==== ::::: ====

You may also be interested in my articles:

==== ::::: ====

I recommend the book America’s Financial Reckoning Day: How you can survive America’s monetary and political decline in the 21st Century by Charles H. Coppes

The U.S. is in deep trouble. America’s financial house of cards is beginning to concern informed individuals (and foreigners) while the vast majority appear either indifferent or unaware of our nation’s serious vulnerability. America’s Financial Reckoning Day is a wake-up call to the baby-boom generation that a hyperinflationary depression and America’s loss of leadership in the world is a distinct possibility in the near future. Chuck Coppes has carefully researched and skillfully presented a compelling case for America’s obsolescence and political paradigms that will help redefine the 21st Century. This is a hard-hitting book about banking intrigue, political malfeasance, treachery, and a prophetic odyssey that reads like an Orwellian novel. It is also a book about survival that will challenge your personal and financial priorities as you read through the final chapters. This book serves as a good reminder that our lives have meaning and significance in God’s plan for the future. For a thorough understanding of the critical times we are living in, it is recommended that you find a quiet place on a peaceful weekend and read this fascinating book in its entirety – and then pass it along to someone you care about.

==== ::::: ====

If regulations have you trapped by an agency in their Administrative Hearings, I recommend the book The Authoritarians: Their Assault on Individual Liberty, the Constitution, and Free Enterprise from the 19th Century to the Present.

==== ::::: ====

If you want to challenge the loss of your rights, I recommend an online law course for those who will fight against the powers-that-be. It has save me and it might just be your get-out-of-jail card. HowToWinInCourt.com

==== ::::: ====

If you want to join me in pondering how the deep state infiltrators got into power, read my 32 page report that questions lawyer’s integrity.

==== ::::: ====

Steven D. Miller is a freelance writer producing informative Articles, blog posts, ghost writing, newsletters, web pages, case studies, white papers, reports, eBooks and high-density documentaries. He is available to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free. Steven.Miller@LibertyContentWriter.com

More people by far get the information they crave and need on the Internet from blog posts than they do from any other source.

Clark Kent will not show up to fight your never ending battles for truth, justice and the American way. But I will.

When the State kidnaps children

Men defend their families which is why we created a government. It is why we go to war. When the State kidnaps your children, will you surrender your family, or will you use their laws to punish the kidnappers? Child protective Services (CPS, or in some states DCF, DSS, DHS, DCFS, FIA, OCS) cannot investigate alleged child abuse or interview a child on private property without exigent circumstances or probable cause, or parent’s permission.

  • Investigative interview of a child constitutes an unreasonable “search and seizure” Doe v. Heck No. 01-3648 (2003) found that a “no prior consent” interview was a clear violation of parent’s constitutional rights.
  • Hurlman v. Rice (1991) The mere possibility of danger does not constitute an emergency or exigent circumstance that would justify a warrantless search of a home or seizure of a child.
  • Quilloin v. Walcott 434 US 246, 155 (1978) It is a due process violation when the state breaks up a family solely on a “best interest” analysis that is not supported by proof of parental unfitness.

You have a right to make your own decisions about your children. Back in the old days
we had a word for this. We called it liberty. Liberty is a constitutionally guaranteed right. The U.S. Supreme Court in a homeschool case, Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, at page 399 gave a partial definition of liberty:

The term Liberty “… denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint, but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, to establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his/her own conscience… the established doctrine is that this liberty may not be interfered with under the guise of protecting public interest, by legislative action which is arbitrary or without reasonable relation to some purpose within the competency of the state to effect.”

Liberty Bell is inscribed with Leviticus 25:10
Leviticus 25:10 Proclaim Liberty Throughout the Land.

In 1993 a federal court ruled in Qutb v. Strauss, 11 F3d 488: “Parents right to rear children without undue governmental interference is a fundamental component of due process.”

Swipies v. Kofka, 348 F3d 701 (2003):

Parents have a liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their children. See Manzano, 60 F.3d at 509. This interest can be limited by the state’s compelling interest in protecting a child: “the parental liberty interest in keeping the family unit intact is not a clearly established right in the context of reasonable suspicion that parents may be abusing children.” See Myers v. Morris, 810 F.2d 1437, 1462 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 828, 108 S.Ct. 97, 98 L.Ed.2d 58 (1987). “[W]hen a state official pursuing a child abuse investigation takes an action which would otherwise unconstitutionally disrupt familial integrity, he or she is entitled to qualified immunity, if such action is properly founded upon a reasonable suspicion of child abuse.” Manzano, 60 F.3d at 510-11.

Don’t be fooled by their term “reasonable suspicion”. It must be an objectively reasonable suspicion, not just a hunch. Don’t be fooled when the State kidnaps your children.

Jenkins v. Rock Hill School District, 513 F3d 580 (2008):

“parents have a liberty interest in the care, custody, and control of their children. Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65, 120 S.Ct. 2054, 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000); see also Pierce v. Soc’y of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 535, 45 S.Ct. 571, 69 L.Ed. 1070 (1925) (Fourteenth Amendment prevents “unreasonably interfering with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.”); Barrett v. Steubenville City Schools, 388 F.3d 967, 972 (6th Cir. 2004) (noting the fundamental right of parents to raise their child has been clearly established); Johnson v. City of Cincinnati, 310 F.3d 484, 499 (6th Cir.2002) (“[A] family member’s right to participate in child rearing and education is one of the most basic and important associational rights protected by the Constitution.”).

1943 WL 54417 (U.S.) Appeal brief to the U.S. Supreme Court from Massachusetts in the 1943 case of Prince v. Massachusetts:

“The prosecution of appellant through misapplication of the statute is a step toward destroying one of the oldest and fundamental institutions of society, namely, the family. The family is the backbone of all orderly governments. It is to democracy what blood is to the human body. Drain away the warm family relationship and substitute the cold foster-parental care of the government and democracy will perish as surely as will the body when the blood ceases to circulate. If the individual in a democracy is to retain his integrity the family relations must not be impaired by misapplied laws. The strength of the nation depends upon the security of the family and family life.”

Note that this is the same Prince v Massachusetts case that the Illinois Supreme Court said was their basis for limiting parental roles.

Don’t be fooled when the State kidnaps your children.

If you want to challenge the loss of your rights, I recommend an online law course for those who will fight against the powers-that-be. It has save me and it might just be your get-out-of-jail card. HowToWinInCourt.com

Here is my in-depth explanation of REGULATIONS.

If regulations have you trapped by an agency in their Administrative Hearings, I recommend the book The Authoritarians: Their Assault on Individual Liberty, the Constitution, and Free Enterprise from the 19th Century to the Present.


You may also be interested in my book on Family Rights.

What does the Firearms Act actually tax?

All gun control laws are derived from The National Firearms Act of 1934, as amended. The National Firearms Act of 1934 is a tax law. But a Constitutionally guaranteed right cannot be taxed — so what does the Firearms Act actually tax? I don’t know the answer. Please help me understand this. I suspect that it is the right to use firearms in regulated Commerce (see the Supreme Court’s Lopez case) but I cannot confirm this. 

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” — Marbury v. Madison 


“… the performance of duty by constituted officers must not be thwarted. But these agents, servants of a Government and a society whose existence and strength comes from these constitutional safeguards, are serving law when they respect, not override, these guarantees. The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot thus be converted into a crime.”
— US Supreme Court in Miller v. US, 230 F2d 486, 489 (1956).

“… reflect the obvious concern that there be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights”
— Sherer v. Cullen , 481 F2d 945.

Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), The Supreme Court ruled that

“The state cannot and does not have the power to license, nor tax, a Right guaranteed to the people,”
and
“a license tax—a flat tax imposed on the exercise of a privilege granted by the Bill of Rights. A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution. Thus, it may not exact a license tax for the privilege of carrying on interstate commerce (McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Co., 309 U.S. 33, 56—58, 60 S.Ct. 388, 397, 398, 84 L.Ed. 565, 128 A.L.R. 876), although it may tax the property used in, or the income derived from, that commerce, so long as those taxes are not discriminatory. Id., 309 U.S. at page 47, 60 S.Ct. at page 392, 84 L.Ed. 565, 128 A.L.R. 876 and cases cited. A license tax applied to activities guaranteed by the First Amendment would have the same destructive effect. It is true that the First Amendment, like the commerce clause, draws no distinction between license taxes, fixed sum taxes, and other kinds of taxes. But that is no reason why we should shut our eyes to the nature of the tax and its destructive influence. The power to impose a license tax on the exercise of these freedoms is indeed as potent as the power of censorship which this Court has repeatedly struck down. ”

In another 1st Amendment case, Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969), the Supreme Court ruled similarly, that

“And our decisions have made clear that a person faced with such an unconstitutional licensing law may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right of free expression for which the law purports to require a license. ”

So what does the Firearms Act actually tax?

 

You may also be interested in 

18 USC Chapter 44 commentary by OriginaalIntent.org 

my essay Gun Control in U.S. – just the basics. – Do Not Be Fooled by Government (NotFooledByGovernment.com)

my essay What is the meaning of the term “militia” in the Second Amendment? 

Farmer Bill Gates

Farmer Bill Gates is now the largest farmland owner in America. You will soon notice shortages at the grocery stores. What will you do when famine hits America?

Globalists want to create a world government. They must first destroy all existing governments before they offer their only solution.

You will notice water shortages caused by Geoengineered droughts. (Here is a link to this week’s Drought Monitor). More predictions of a continued drought can be found at Drought by Benjamin Cook, a research scientist with NASA Earth Observatory. And a scientific paper Megadroughts in North America.

But food and water shortages are not their only plan. Chaos is their plan for destruction. You will notice computer chips, that were once manufactured in the USA, will be withheld from their foreign sources. You will notice forced vaccinations, forced credentials to enter the marketplace, intelligent surveillance robots (soon to become AI Terminator Robots), loss of ALL freedoms especially gun rights, and the Federal Reserve cryptocurrency (to implement their end of paper money).

How much of the United States does China really own? | Fox News

Farmer Bill Gates owns 242 Thousand acres of farmland in 16 States, many theories abound. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsR3zx8JXws

He also owns 27,000 acres of other land.

Farmer Bill Gates wants rich countries to sustain themselves with synthetic beef. While the world faces a famine.

Also see https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/bill-gatess-plan-to-destroy-animal-agriculture/

The 2008 documentary video Food, Inc. exposed the corporate takeover of food production.
Then there were theories that Monsanto purchased the Blackwater mercenary army. It might not be proved, but there is substantial evidence behind this theory.

Nearly 30 million acres of U.S. farmland is owned by foreigners. Much of this is China. Source: Nearly 30 Million Acres Of US Farmland Now Owned By Foreigners

One in four U.S. pigs are owned by China. Source: How China is buying up America’s food supply
A Communist Chinese firm has purchased Smithfield, the world’s largest pork processor and hog producer. According to Smithfield “The company was founded in Smithfield, Virginia, in 1936 and was acquired by Hong Kong-based WH Group in 2013.”

America cannot feed itself.

According to Census.gov the U.S. exported $15,119,687,096 in food and agriculture (excluding wood products) to Communist China in 2019.

What would happen if Communist China and Farmer Bill Gates were to stop selling food to us? What could possibly go wrong?

History of the Globalists

As America becomes accustomed to Collectivists making every decision for us, farmers are forced to comply with intrusive federal regulations. Even the family dog must be tagged as livestock, in case there is a disease outbreak. (source)

Stalin’s Communism killed 20 Million. Source: Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin – The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Stalin deliberately starved Seven Million in Ukraine with his forced collectivist (communism) policies to eliminate small farms and use modern agriculture machinery to feed the citizens. Source: The History Place – Genocide in the 20th Century: Stalin’s Forced Famine 1932-33
Also see the Stalin quote, below.

Farmer Bill Gates’ father was a Eugenicist. Bill Gates, Sr. obituary in the NY Times said he was a director of Planned Parenthood. For more information on the original goals of Planned Parenthood, see my post on Roe v. Wade.

Geo Engineering

The Dimming by GeoEngineeringWatch.org is full length documentary on weather modification Chem trails. Link: The Dimming, Full Length Climate Engineering Documentary ( Geoengineering Watch ) – YouTube

During the 2021 severely cold weather in Texas, temperatures at the North Pole were 33 degrees warmer than the Gulf Coast of Texas. Meteorologically speaking, this anomalous weather could not have been a natural occurrence, and it doesn’t make sense that higher elevations in the area would have warmer temperatures. This could only happen through an endothermic reacting material like chemical ice nucleation, Link: https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/chemically-nucleated-winter-weather/

15,000 to 30,000 cattle died in the 2013 early October blizzard in western South Dakota. Their nostrils frost froze solid. Geo Engineering chemicals explain this endothermic ice nucleation. The cattle death count was later increased to 50,000.

What could possibly go wrong?

Joseph Stalin, Speech on Agrarian Policy — Dec. 27, 1929:

Note: kulaks were family owned farms

{1} The characteristic feature in the work of our Party during the past year is that we, as a Party, as the Soviet power:
    a) have developed an offensive along the whole front against the capitalist elements in the countryside;
    b) that this offensive, as you know, has yielded and continues to yield very appreciable, positive results.

{2} What does this mean? It means that we have passed from the policy of restricting the exploiting tendencies of the kulaks to the policy of eliminating the kulaks as a class. It means that we have carried out, and are continuing to carry out, one of the decisive turns in our whole policy.

{3} Until recently the Party adhered to the policy of restricting the exploiting tendencies of the kulaks. As you know, this policy was proclaimed as far back as the Eighth Party Congress. It was again announced at the time of the introduction of NEP and at the Eleventh Congress of our Party. We all remember Lenin’s well-known letter [in 1922 in which he] . . . once again returned to the need for pursuing this policy. Finally, this policy was confirmed by the Fifteenth Congress of our Party. And it was this policy that we were pursuing until recently.

{4} Was this policy correct? Yes, it was absolutely correct at the time. Could we have undertaken such an offensive against the kulaks some five years or three years ago? Could we then have counted on success in such an offensive? No, we could not. That would have been the most dangerous adventurism. It would have been a vcry dangerous playing at an offensive. For we should certainly have failed, and our failure would have strengthened the position of the kulaks. Why? Because we did not yet have in the countryside strongpoints in the form of a wide network of state farms and collective farms which could be the basis for a determined offensive against the kulaks. Because a. that time we were not yet able to replace the capitalist production of the kulaks by the socialist production of the collective farms and state farms. . . .

{5} An offensive against the kulaks is a serious matter. It should not be confused with declamations against the kulaks. Nor should it be confused with a policy of pinpricks against the kulaks, which the . . . opposition did its utmost to impose upon the Party. To launch an offensive against the kulaks means that we must smash the kulaks, eliminate them as a class. Unless we set ourselves these aims, an offensive would be mere declamation, pinpricks, phrase-mongering, anything but a real Bolshevik offensive. To launch an offensive against the kulaks means that we must prepare for it and then strike at the kulaks, strike so hard as to prevent them from rising to their feet again. That is what we Bolsheviks call a real offensive. Could we have undertaken such an offensive some five years or three years ago with any prospect of success? No, we could not.

{6} Indeed, in 1927 the kulaks produced over 600 million poods of grain, about 130 million poods of which they marketed outside the rural districts. That was a rather serious power, which had to be reckoned with. How much did our collective farms and state farms produce at that time? About 80 million poods, of which about 35 million poods were sent to the market (marketable grain). Judge for yourselves, could we at that time have replaced the kulak output and kulak marketable grain by the output and marketable grain of our collective farms and state farms? Obviously, we could not.

{7} What would it have meant to launch a determined offensive agains. the kulaks under such conditions? It would have meant certain failure, strengthening the position of the kulaks and being left without grain. That is why we could not and should not have undertaken a determined offensive against the kulaks at that time. . .

{8} But today? What is the position now? Today, we have an adequate material base for us to strike at the kulaks, to break their resistance, to eliminate them as a class, and to replace their output by the output of the collective farms and state farms. You know that in 1929 the grain produced on the collective farms and state farms amounts to not less than 400 million poods (200 million poods below the gross output of the kulak farms in 1927). You also know that in 1929 the collective farms and state farms have supplied more than 130 million poods of marketable grain (i.e., more than the kulaks did in 1927). Lastly, you know that in 1930 the gross grain output of the collective farms and state farms will amount to not less than 900 million poods (i.e., more than the gross output of the kulaks in 1927), and their output of marketable grain will be not less than 400 million poods (i.e., incomparably more than the kulaks supplied in 1927).

{9} That is how matters stand with us now, comrades.

{10} There you have the change that has taken place in the economy of our country.

{11} Now, as you see, we have the material base which enables us to replace the kulak output by the output of the collective farms and state farms. It is for this very reason that our determined offensive against the kulaks is now meeting with undeniable success.

{12} That is how an offensive against the kulaks must be carried on, if we mean a genuine and determined offensive and not mere futile declamations against the kulaks.

{13} That is why we have recently passed from the policy of restricting the exploiting tendencies of the kulaks to the policy of eliminating the kulaks as a class.

{14} Well, and what about the policy of dekulakization? Can we permit dekulakization in the areas of complete collectivization? This question is asked in various quarters. A ridiculous question! We could not permit dekulakization as long as we were pursuing the policy of restricting the exploiting tendencies of the kulaks, as long as we were unable to go over to a determined offensive against the kulaks, as long as we were unable to replace the kulak output by the output of the collective farms and state farms. At that time the policy of not permitting dekulakization was necessary and correct. But now? Now things are different. Now we are able to carry on a determined offensive against the kulaks, break their resistance, eliminate them as a class and replace their output by the output of the collective farms and state farms. Now, dekulakization is being carried out by the masses of poor and middle peasants themselves, who are putting complete collectivization into practice. Now, dekulakization in the areas of complete collectivization is no longer just an administrative measure. Now, it is an integral part of the formation and development of the collective farms. Consequently it is now ridiculous and foolish to discourse at length on dekulakization. When the head is off, one does not mourn for the hair.

{15} There is another question which seems no less ridiculous: whether the kulaks should be permitted to join the collective farms. Of course not, for they are sworn enemies of the collective-farm movement.

In The United States

FREEDOM FROM WANT?

Feds Escalate Assault On Dairy Farmers
By Liz Reitzig

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) apparent war on Amish “raw dairy” farmers increased on Dec. 6 when the FDA filed a motion for summary judgment with Pennsylvania judge Lawrence Stengler asking for a permanent injunction against dairy farmer Dan Allgyer to forbid him from selling fresh milk out of state. FDA regulation 21 CFR §1240.61 criminalizes any selling of milk intended to cross state lines.

After a two-year, expensive exhaustive undercover operation, including multiple armed raids on Allgyer’s farm, FDA agents and a team of 10 federal lawyers amassed over 276 pages of evidence allegedly proving what Allgyer openly admits, that he is selling fresh (raw, unpasteurized) milk to customers who knowingly carry the milk across state lines. Thousands of Maryland customers who have been buying from Allgyer for years were the main focus for evidence during the investigation. In spite of the FDA raids and injunction filing, Allgyer has continued to support his customers’ needs for fresh milk and other farm foods, citing his God-given inalienable rights. Like mos tAmish  people, Allgyer is reluctant to participate in the legal system, but he has chosen to respond, and his response claims that the FDA action “has created a serious dilemma” by “violating [his] due process and equal protection under the law,” and he is “prepared to proceed with a public court forum, if necessary.” Should Stengler sign the motion, the injunction would not ban Allgyer  from selling in Pennsylvania, but the Maryland families he supplies would lose their food source and he would lose his out-of-state business and would be subjected to strenuous regulation and unannounced, unlimited, unwarranted inspections, at his expense, including costs of travel, food, lodging and per diems for inspectors. A single inspection could cost as much as $10,000.

Allyger’s response argues that the FDA’s action, though classified as a civil action, is in reality “a quasicriminal action . . . because of the severe sanctions and consequences that could occur as a result of the FDA investigation and the inspection” and as such “requires prior notice of the offense, probable cause and official complaint, which is totally lacking in this case.” Organizers of the D.C. area-buying club Grassfed on the Hill, supplied by Allgyer, helped form the Raw Milk Freedom Riders in support of Allgyer and other farmers like him.

“The freedom riders are a group of consumers challenging the FDA’s regulation by engaging indeliberate civil disobedience. They demand the FDA cease prosecuting farmers and consumers for transporting raw milk across state lines,” says the group’s founder, Karine Bouis-Towe. “The riders have staged two ‘freedom rides.’ On Nov. 1 they took raw milk from Pennsylvania to FDA headquarters in Silver Spring, Md., then on Dec. 8 they transported raw milk from Wisconsin to Chicago, Ill., both times distributing the milk. The FDA declined to prosecute in both cases.”

The action against Allgyer is the latest in a string of FDA persecutions of Amish dairy farmers in recent years.

——

Liz Reitzigis the co-founder of the Farm Food Freedom Coalition, an advocacy group that helps farmers under assault from the government.

U.S. History

When the Constitution was being considered for  ratification, there were debates about the Constitutional clause to regulate interstate commerce.  For a long time people thought the words “regulate commerce among the several states” referred ONLY to promoting commerce, not restricting commerce, after all, “one of the objectives of the Philadelphia Convention was the promotion of commerce” according to an analysis of the Constitution published in 1996 by the Congressional Research Service in Senate Document 103-6. Example: the first agriculture department in Pennsylvania was created to help farmers sell eggs OUTSIDE of Pennsylvania , and to run a state fair, promoting Pennsylvania grown produce. THAT’S IT!  That was the government’s understanding of the Constitution clause “regulating commerce among the several states”

“The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for, among old parchments, or musty records. They are written, as with a sun beam in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power.”
— Alexander Hamilton, 1775, The Farmer Refuted

You may be interested in:

The book The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Biden said Corn Syrup more dangerous than terrorists.

USDA agricultural census program is a covert surveillance operation to compile government database of food and farm assets – NaturalNews.com

China Owns US

Home – The Grow Network : The Grow Network

ice age farmer | food, abundance, warmth

Something is fishy in the United States

Food disparagement laws

Martial Law takeover of courts

U.S. District Courts were not established by the U.S. Constitution. They did not exist prior to 1948. They were created under martial law rule.

  • Article 1, section 8 allows Congress to constitute tribunals inferior to the Superior Court. Whereas Article 3 courts are established, not constituted. Do not be fooled just because tribunals call themselves “courts.”
  • The checks and balances between branches of government are established by the Constitution. Legislative powers cannot control judicial courts that were established by the Constitution.
  • Real Judicial courts are NOT subject to a statute of limitations.
  • U.S. District Courts are not established by the constitution.
  • Judicial (Article 3) courts’ judges must have the constitutional security of tenure and salary.
  • See my article Gold Fringed Flag Facts. – Do Not Be Fooled by Government (notfooledbygovernment.com)

NON-CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS

“POWER OF CONGRESS TO CONTROL THE FEDERAL COURTS …
Unlike its original jurisdiction, the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is subject to “exceptions and regulations” prescribed by Congress, and the jurisdiction of the inferior federal courts is subject to congressional prescription. Additionally, Congress has power to regulate modes and practices of proceeding on the part of the inferior federal courts. Whether there are limitations to the exercise of these congressional powers, and what the limitations may be, are matters that have vexed scholarly and judicial interpretation over the years, inasmuch as congressional displeasure with judicial decisions has sometimes led to successful efforts to “curb” the courts and more frequently to proposed but unsuccessful curbs.1171 Supreme Court holdings establish clearly the breadth of congressional power, and numerous dicta assert an even broader power, but that Congress may through the exercise of its powers vitiate and overturn constitutional decisions and restrain the exercise of constitutional rights is an assertion often made but not sustained by any decision of the Court.”

— Senate Document 112-9 at Page 841
U.S. Supreme Court main door

According to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall:

“The appellate powers of this court are not given by the judicial act. They are given by the constitution. But they are limited and regulated by the judicial act, and by such other acts as have been passed on the subject.”

— Durousseau v. United States, 10 U.S. (6 Cr.) 307, 313–314 (1810). “Courts which are created by written law, and whose jurisdiction is defined by written law, cannot transcend that jurisdiction.” Ex parte Bollman, 8 U.S. (4 Cr.) 75, 93 (1807) (Chief Justice Marshall). Marshall had earlier expressed his Durousseau thoughts in United States v. More, 7 U.S. (3 Cr.) 159 (1805).

“The notion has frequently been entertained, that the federal courts derive their judicial power immediately from the constitution: but the political truth is, that the disposal of the judicial power (except in a few specified instances) belongs to Congress.
If Congress has given the power to this Court, we possess it, not otherwise: and if Congress has not given the power to us, or to any other Court, it still remains at the legislative disposal. Besides, Congress is not bound, and it would, perhaps, be inexpedient, to enlarge the jurisdiction of the federal courts, to every subject, in every form, which the constitution might warrant.”

— Turner v. Bank of North America, 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 8, 10 (1799).

Federal Regional Power

Federal regional power is authorized by Martial Law. Before martial law existed there were only United States Judicial Districts, which were superior to state courts, and only considered constitutional questions. A good discussion of this is the US Supreme Court decision in Ableman v. Booth 62 US 506 (1858) about the fugitive slave act. The reason they only considered constitutional questions is because there could be no federal laws that apply to state citizens, except for the three crimes mentioned in the Constitution. There is no other authority granted to the federal government that affects state citizens.

After martial law was imposed Federal District Courts (federal regional tribunals) were constituted which are inferior to state courts. Federal regional tribunals cannot possess the judicial power of the United States when hearing statutory regional proceedings. The only authority for the supremacy of federal regional power is under Article II Martial law. These Legislative (not judicial) Tribunals are constituted, not “established”, under Article I, Section 8, clause 9 of the US Constitution.

Do not be fooled that they are called courts.
There is no Act of Congress before 1948 naming any court “The United States District Court”, or “The United States Circuit Court of Appeals”. These two Courts did not exist before 1948. In 1948 Congress enacted Title 28 USC into Positive Law. This title creates courts that do not possess the judicial power of the United States. They can be delegated legislative authority only, because the Constitution did not establish them as judicial courts. They can only possess legislative authority, because the legislature created them. (such as Military jurisdiction — Again, a judicial court is established if the Constitution authorizes it under the Judicial Article). They can possess the Military jurisdiction that the martial law amendments (13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 23, 24, 26) specifically say “shall be enforced by Congress”.
These two courts were created under Title 28 acts of Congress. Before 1948 it was impossible for these two Courts to exist.). Again: Article 1, section 8 authorizes Congress “To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court”. Legislative tribunals are not judicial courts, but they call themselves courts.

See my essay on the gold fringed flag.

You can be dragged into marital law courts if you have applied for, or received, federal welfare. Such as getting a Social Security Number. Start studying by reading my essay on Things the government forgot to tell you about the Social Security System.

%d bloggers like this: