Birth Certificates

Birth Certificates are not what you’ve been told. Birth Certificates waive your right to your children and qualify them to later become collateral for the national debt.

Prerequisite to understanding this essay: read my essay on Your All Capitalized Name

BIRTH CERTIFICATES

Are they required ?

Federal Rules of evidence (and I assume all State rules of evidence) say that family records are an exception to the hearsay exclusion rules.

Licensed doctors, hospitals, nurses, midwives are required to register the birth with the state.  But not parents. My birth certificate does not have either parent’s signature. From the State’s point of view, only the licensed agent of the State named me. Your birth certificate will probably be missing a parent’s signature.

The Amish will not get birth certificates.  The Anabaptists of the middle ages (todays Amish, Mennonites and at least the “real” Baptists) have a long history of not registering children with authorities.  They were burned at the stake for refusing to register, bravely suffering a painful execution knowing that their orphans would be raised by their murderers.  How about you?   When will you take a stand?

It helps to record the home birth in the county records just to avoid problems like Alecia Faith Pennington. see https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/03/12/how-a-teenagers-viral-campaign-to-prove-her-citizenship-is-inspiring-a-new-texas-bill/ but recording is only for purposes of inheritance proof, it is not to register collateral for the National Debt. [Ms. Pennington is overly dramatic — the rules of evidence allow family records such as entries in family Bibles to be admissible, just as is testimony regarding family history  — and the statements of a Notary who knows you also does not need to see government ID].

Hearsay rules

A birth date is hearsay.  It is not identification.
People v. Rath, 115 Ca.132:

“Testimony by a witness in court in response to a question as to his own status, for example age, legitimacy, nationality, is closely related to the subject of pedigree declaration (pedigree has to do with animals). A person cannot know these facts except from hearsay information, for he cannot even be informed of these facts until an appreciative time after his birth.”

Quoting from my book of two decades ago, which is still published at famguardian.org:
Now look at a birth certificate.  Is the baby’s name in all capital letters?  Did the father name the baby or did the doctor, while exercising his duties as a licensed government agent, assign the name to the baby?  Is there any hint on the legal document that the father named the baby?  Does an all capitalized name differ in some essential particular from his true Christian name?  If so, the implication is that it is meant to deceive or mislead.  If not, then you’ve acknowledged that the all capitalized name is his true name, which cannot be a Christian name.  Does your state birth certificate laws use the word ‘person’ when referring to the name on the certificate?
The government now has proof that the baby is a PERSON.  PERSONS have legal existence in the eyes of the law, and are subject to the statutes written by the legislature.  Sovereigns are above the law written by their servants.  The PERSON on the birth certificate will not be able to exercise the rights of a non-person.  You, like Esau, gave up your birthright, which will not pass to your children.
There is something even more sinister here.  Government cannot know about matters of childbirth.  According to the Supreme Court’s famous Roe v. Wade decision “State criminal abortion laws… violate due process clause of Fourteenth Amendment protecting right to privacy”. That’s right!  The Supreme Court says childbearing must remain strictly private.  Why then is the doctor informing the government that a child was born?  I suspect that the doctor is required to register government property.  The government wants to secure another loan on the national debt and it needs collateral.  A UCC-1 financing statement is not necessary because pursuant to UCC 9-302:
“The filing of a financing statement otherwise required is not necessary or effective to perfect a security interest in property subject to (1) A statute or treaty of the United States which provides for a national or international registration or a national or international certificate of title or which provides a place for filing different from that specified …”
Is the doctor giving the baby to whoever owns the government?  2 Peter 2:3 (KJV)  “And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you …”  Now, if you don’t think the government is owned, look at a birth certificate and tell me why the STATE NAME is all capitalized.  Hint: it’s not all capitalized in your original state constitution.  Those who created your government gave their creation a proper noun.  Those who overthrew your government are operating a corporation with a non-proper noun, yet they are afraid to counterfeit the real government because there is a remnant of righteous individuals ready to restore lawful authority and execute them.
Fictitious names exist for a purpose.  Fictions are invented to give courts jurisdiction.  Snider v. Newellm, 44 SE 354.  That’s right.  Corporations are fictions created by government, even foreign governments.  Persons are also fictions created by government.  However, real Christians, being non-fiction, were protected against the courts.  They governed themselves.
Can a Christian use an all capitalized fictitious name knowing that to do so is “…with the implication that it is meant to deceive or mislead”?  Now look at your driver’s license or passport or birth certificate or voter registration.  Can a Christian use an all capitalized fictitious name on any ID?  Now go and try to get a government ID or birth certificate with a Christian name and see what happens.  You cannot do it.  Government cannot issue any ID with your Christian name on it.  CHRISTIANS CANNOT GET A GOVERNMENT ID CARD.  Christians are not part of their system, and DO NOT EXIST IN THE EYES OF THEIR LAW.  Only non-Christians can get an ID (mark) of the beast.  Only non-Christians can have a name of (of= created by) the beast.  Only non-Christians can get the (ID) number of the Beast’s name (name=authority).
Do you now confess that you have a mark of a beast, a name of a beast, and a number of his name?
Fictions give courts jurisdiction.  Could a fictitious, all capitalized, name of your state government be an image of the beast?  The Greek word for image that is used in Revelation’s image of the beast is the Greek word icon (Strong’s 1504).  Synonyms: image, artifice, and fabrication.  Also see: ruse, expedient.  This icon that receives worship is not the same thing as an idol, which can also receive worship, although both are made by the hands of man.
Without an ID card you will notice that you are denied the right to travel by car or by airline.  Nor can you cash a check or open a bank account or get a home phone.  Nor can you rent a Post Office Box (per Domestic Mail regulation DMM 951.142 even though the Post Office cannot accept a Social Security Card as identification).  You can still officially get a job without a SSN.  But soon, you will be officially unable to get a job.  Your papers are not in order.  Christians will be persecuted.
If you want to try an exercise in frustration, try to get the phone company to send you your bill with your real name on it to your real address.  You cannot do it.  You must worship the state god in order to get phone service.  The state is the god that created the corporation.  Real people don’t exist in the eyes of the law.
Conclusion: as suggested by the Baldwin case quoted above, claiming that you are a U.S. citizen (with a Birth Certificate, or on an SSN application) is enough proof that you were born into your federal government.  “A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government…” (Kitchens v. Steele 112 F.Supp 383).
Real people do not exist in the eyes of the law, because people are sovereigns, and the legislature cannot and does not write laws for their masters (Matt 10:24, and John 15:20).
Most government forms ask for a date of birth.  A date of birth on a government form is not the date you took your first breath, it is the date the instrument was signed that made you property of the government.  The UN is involved in “the official birth registration process” per Title 20, Code of Federal Regulations, section 422.103(b)(2).
Here is further proof that government forms do not ask for the day you took your first breath: Hearsay is inadmissible in court.  Although you were present on your born-day, you were not aware of any specific calendar system on that day, nor does your memory serve you well.  It would be subornation of perjury for any government officer (with or without a form) to coerce you, under penalty of perjury, for inadmissible hearsay that you cannot recall.  Federal Rules of Evidence rule 602 prohibits you from telling them your birth day.  However, family records are admissible.
You may also be interested in my books on Identification Credentials and Family Rights.  Find out about the history of birth certificates.

Enumeration at Birth Program:

For the requirement to get SSNs for newborns see Topic #4 in my free essay on the Social Security System.  It is required by a WTO trade treaty as colleterial for trade debts. Forced labor camps are waiting.

Registration of children as “biological property” (possibly a qualification to later become collateral for the National Debt?):

Edward Mandell House; in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson*:

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

* quoted in  Fruit from a Poisonous Tree by Melvin Stamper, JD [Fruit from a Poisonous Tree also points out that “All you own belongs to the Federal Reserve” and “You are made a slave by the way your name is spelled”]
Also quoted in Progressive or Progressive-Lite: the Historic Thinking of Progressivism  by Wade Doorey
• Regarding the Stamper comment: It is probably true that everything you own belongs to the Fed, see the 1933 Senate Document 43 which was issued just after they confiscated our gold coins: “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual so-called ‘ownership’ is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State” [This paragraph of Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session, referred to Brown v. Welch].  More information is on my essay http://notfooledbygovernment.com/are-you-an-enemy-of-the-state/
• The U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. v. Kozminski, 487 U.S. 931, in 1988, has confirmed that it is perfectly lawful to hold slaves to unpaid forced labor.  If it is voluntary.  — Well guess what?  You volunteered when you applied to your guardian to become a ward.

Bastards by licensed marriage

Bastards cannot attend church even down to the tenth generation (Deuteronomy 23:2).
.
If you pay a fee for a marriage license, then you’ve agreed that you don’t have a right to marry, and furthermore, you’ve paid to have your family regulated by the state.  The presumption by the family court is that there has never been a commitment to a real husband-wife relationship, until death do you part.  Any evidence to prove that you had a commitment will be inadmissible.  Since there is no commitment, there is no marriage contract between the bride and groom.  Since there is no commitment, there is no man-wife relationship.  Since there is no commitment, all children are bastards.  The state claims all rights to bastards, therefore all children are subject to the state’s determination for “care, custody, education, and maintenance”
Perhaps children are indeed fruits of the state.  After all, when a slave owner allows two slaves to mate and they produce new property, the new property is registered in the owner’s records.  Is your birth registered in your father’s family bible, or is your birth registered in your owner’s records?
Asking for permission to get married is a confession that you do not have a right to get married.  By applying for a marriage license, you’ve waived your right to get married.
Marriage is the joining together of a man and woman in order to raise a family.  GOD GIVES CHILDREN TO PARENTS (1st CHRONICLES 25:5).  PARENTHOOD IS A RIGHT GIVEN BY GOD.  By getting permission to marry, or by selling you children into slavery in order to get a tax deduction, or by accepting welfare, children become wards of the state.  1st Corinthians 7:23 says You were bought by Christ, do not become the slaves of men.  We are to be slaves to God (Romans 6:22, Galatians 1:10).  If you want to uphold the Lordship of Christ do not mark your children.
When the law says that the state cannot recognize a common law marriage, it doesn’t mean you’re not married.  It means the state cannot take your children nor divorce you.  God’s laws prevail.  A common law marriage simply means that your family is not part of their corporation.  Your family does not have existence in the eyes of their laws.  But beware that there are multiple definitions of common law marriage.  They twist things around.  They will insist that a common law marriage is when a couple lives in sin.  In that case, there is no commitment, and the family court has jurisdiction.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.  You should have known (as did the Supreme Court in Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105) that “A state may not, through a license tax, impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution.”  By paying for a marriage license, you confessed that you did not have a right to get married.  The power to tax is the power to destroy.  What part of “let no man put asunder” don’t you understand?

More name games with children.

Government cannot know the names or birthdates or family relationships of your children.  Or even the existence of your children.  They cannot even ask!  Here are proofs that birth certificates are about government property, not about babies:
• Roe v. Wade was a Fourteenth Amendment privacy case.  Government could not know about procreation or child rearing, thereby allowing abortion in the first trimester to go unpunished because the abortion laws were written in such that they “… violate due process clause of Fourteenth Amendment protecting right to privacy…”  Your family has a right to privacy.  Roe v. Wade went on to also state “Several decisions of this Court make clear that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
• Yeager v. Hackensack, 615 F.Supp.1087, citing the authority of Roe v. Wade, confirmed that “Right to be free from compelled disclosure of names of household members is within right of privacy protected by Constitution.”  If your census instructions did not disclose this, find out more in my book on the Census.
• Yeager v. Hackensack also confirmed that private utilities cannot request Social Security Numbers without first complying with the disclosure provisions of section 7(b) of the Privacy Act.
• Roe v. Wade cannot be an abortion case.  It is only a privacy case.  Proof #1: the Supreme Court will not hear cases unless the party is damaged (according to rules laid down in their Ashwander case).  Only Roe’s privacy was damaged.  Roe was not arrested for having an abortion.  Roe did not have an abortion, she gave birth to a son who remains an active critic of the abortion laws.  Proof#2: The abortion doctor in the Roe v. Wade case, Dr. James Hallford, was remanded back to state courts for his punishment. Roe v. Wade DID NOT legalize abortions.  A million repetitions of a lie do not make it true.  More…
• Matters of child bearing or child rearing must remain strictly private.  This cannot be overemphasized.  Asking for the birth date of a child is such a gross violation of privacy, it is like asking to watch the birth!  I offer the following proof that matters of child bearing require this level of privacy: the Supreme Court in Bowers v. Hardwick recognized that sodomy laws must be enforced because “The right to privacy does not extend to acts of consensual sodomy between homosexual adults”.  Because procreation is private and crimes are not.   Any bureaucrat who asks for a child’s birthdate is violating your most sacred family privacy.  Treat him like you would treat Herod.
• According to rules of evidence your family records, or records of religious organizations are just as valid as records of state vital statistics made to a public office (these are under the hearsay exception rules — which say that hearsay is not admissible except for these three pages of exceptions which are admissible).  The main difference is that government documents are self-authenticating.
Here is a challenge: You can overturn Roe v. Wade if you can find ANY government form that compels the disclosure of a child’s name or birthdate or existence.  [Unless, of course, the child is the government’s child.  Government property must be regulated.  Which kind are your children?]
Midwives are now “required” to report home births to government so that a birth certificate can be issued, and a SSN will be issued pursuant to the GATT treaty.  Midwives under Pharaoh were also required to report the birth of Moses; so that civil government could process him (Acts 7:19) but these midwives lied to their government.  Quiz: Is it right or is it wrong for Midwives to lie to government?  When Jesus was a baby, all little boys in Bethlehem were to be processed by civil government.  Is it right or wrong to escape lawful government processing of children?
For the advanced student:
In Maynard v. Hill the Supreme Court referred to the Maynard’s marriage with the term `status‘, and every occurrence of the term `status‘ was in italics.  I never found out what the italics signifies.  If you want to do some research, find out what italics means in Supreme Court decisions, and keep in mind that Social Security is also not based on contract, but upon a status. you can also study the Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act of 1921, 42 Stat 224, formerly 42 U.S.C. §161-175, and the Federal Birth Registration areas of 1929, and Meeker v. U.S., 350 U.S. 199, and Chapter 135 sect 9, 42 U.S.C. §225 which gave the Children’s Bureau power to enter homes and take children.
YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN:
  • My book Identification Credentials
  • My free essay on Persons, Residents, Inhabitants.  http://notfooledbygovernment.com/persons-residents-inhabitants/
  • My free essay on Presumed Contracts where you can find read quotes from the book “Ancient Law” by Sir Henry Sumner Maine (John Murray Publisher, Albemarle Street, London. 1861) documented the conspiracy to ensnare you with ancient laws that pledged generations of labor:  documenting “a movement from Status to Contract”
Galatians 5:1 (NIV)  “It is for freedom that Christ has set us free.  Stand firm, then, and do not let  yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.”
%d bloggers like this: