Caravans of illegal immigrants are invited to invade your country, and politicians do nothing.
What could possibly go wrong?
We had a legal immigrant problem over one hundred years ago, but we also had common sense.
Teddy Roosevelt required immigrants to assimilate
It was common sense that “Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all.” — he went on to say we don’t have room for anyone else.
That’s right. In 1919 legal immigration was a problem because some would not assimilate. We did not have individual welfare programs then, yet everyone knew we did not have room for anyone else.
Teddy Roosevelt speech to the New York City Chamber of Commerce November 11, 1902:
“the traditional American self-reliance of spirit which makes them scorn to ask from the government, whether of State or of Nation, anything but a fair field and no favor; who confide not in being helped by others, but in their own skill, energy, and business capacity to achieve success. The first requisite of a good citizen in this Republic of ours is that he shall be able and willing to pull his weight that he shall not be a mere passenger, but shall do his share in the work that each generation of us finds ready to hand; and, furthermore, that in doing his work he shall show not only the capacity for sturdy self-help but also self-respecting regard for the rights of others.”
Socialism cannot recognize individual rights. You cannot covet your neighbor’s wealth and expect to have rights to your own wealth. Yet you accept welfare. Illegals who do not assimilate will have their way with you. You got what you deserve.
There are consequences to tolerating welfare. God’s laws will not be scorned. The Maxims of Law will not change just because you believe the socialists. There are consequences to your participation. Maxim of Law: Ex dolo malo non oritur actio. He has invited what has come, and he must accept it. Illegals will have their way with you.
Here are some articles warning us that illegals have an average of four criminal convictions.
2150 years ago the Greek historian Polybius wrote:
“But when a new generation arises and the democracy falls into the hands of the grandchildren of its founders, they have become so accustomed to freedom and equality that they no longer value them, and begin to aim at pre-eminence; and it is chiefly those of ample fortune who fall into this error. So when they begin to lust for power and cannot attain it through themselves or their own good qualities, they ruin their estates, tempting and corrupting the people in every possible way. And hence when by their foolish thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, democracy in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. For the people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch.”
— The Histories Of the Roman Republic 220-146 BC, Book 6, section 9
The Genocide Treaty, 78 UNTS 277, defines the crime of genocide, in time of peace or in time of war, as intent to destroy in whole or in part certain protected groups (national, ethnical, racial, or religious). Political groups ARE NOT PROTECTED FROM GENOCIDE. In the U.S., the Genocide of Political Enemies has become an acceptable policy of your government.
Your representatives in Congress represent you. Political Enemies are not protected from YOUR policy of Genocide.
Political enemies were once on the Genocide Treaty’s list of protected groups, but it was removed before the United States adopted it into our Criminal Laws 18 USC 1091 under Bill Clinton in 1994. But we did not adopt it word for word. We added lawyer weasel words to allow us to get away with domestic genocide.
The killing of all political enemies is acceptable according to this treaty.
If you don’t recognize the photo, it is at a National Socialist’s forced labor camp.
HOMELESS
When the eviction moratorium ends, millions will end up homeless. They will end up in resettlement work camps.
Our national debt is twice our annual income. We keep borrowing $Trillions from our children. Socialists now demand that we forgive college loans (spit in the faces of those who worked to pay their way through college), pay everyone’s health care, give them free money, house the caravans of illegal criminal invaders that Biden invited, etc. All these debts will come due soon.
When the national debt cannot be paid, what is planned for your future? Absconding debtors can be imprisoned. Once your assets are seized and you cannot make a debt payment, then you become a homeless absconding debtor. The concentration camps are ready. Work will set you free. But only if your labor, at prison wages, can pay off your debt.
(No, this is not for foreign refugee camps, notice the requirement for Social Security Numbers in paragraph 7-16 — and don’t miss the term “reeducation” in chapter 8 and Appendix K)
You can also read the CIVILIAN INMATE LABOR PROGRAM, Army Regulation 210-35 http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/r210_35.pdf
Welcome to your Novus Ordo Seclorum Secular New World Order.
Any questions?
THEY CANNOT DO THIS TO US, you proclaim.
Well, guess what. You already volunteered just by claiming to be a U..S. citizen.
The citizenship oath of allegiance already requires you to provide unlimited labor for the rest of your life. An oath of citizenship, according to the Department of Homeland Security 8 CFR 337, is a commitment to
“perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; …”.
This is unlimited perpetual slavery. Your forced labor is collateral for the national debt. Your debt to society must be paid. Your allegiance was turned over to the creditors (by lawyers). You are permanently obligated until you pay your debt to society.
Arbeit Macht Frei Work will set you free, but only if you can pay off your debts at prison wages.
There is an old rock song from 1971 that advises, ” Tax the rich, feed the poor, till there are rich no more.” (I’d Love to Change the World, by Ten Years After). Throughout the history of class warfare, this has been every promise of socialism.
Four years before the Russian Revolution put the Bolsheviks in power, the USA Income Tax Amendment was ratified in 1913. The only reason it was ratified is because everyone was assured, over and over again, that it would only tax the bank account interest of the rich, and it would not tax wages. And now everyone believes the lie. More about this later.
But first I want to point out the obvious.
Socialism cannot recognize individual rights.
Socialist countries exist because the leaders are always corrupt.* That is how they got their power. That is how they stay in power. Socialist leaders will stay rich, while they exploit everyone else.
And he is pushing for a global minimum tax. Taxation without representation.
We cannot possibly keep borrowing money from our children and expect to have a future. The net worth of all American taxpayers is less than half of our debt, and nothing is done to pay off the debt. Our children will grow up destitute in the land their fathers built from sea to shining sea.
1934 Chicago Tribune cartoon mocking the FDR socialists’ plan
Those who lust for power will drive others back into perfect savages.*
HISTORY of traditional values, which never tax the rich
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wealth.
Paul repeated King David’s warning that government charity would be a snare to trap you. Romans 11:9
After Christ told us that the Kingdom of God was at hand, and right before he told his followers that he appoints unto them a kingdom; he said unto them that the kings of the Gentiles (pagans) exercise lordship over others so that they will be called benefactors. But you shall not be so. Luke 22:25.
Galatians 5:15 But if you bite one another, you yourself will be consumed.
Second Peter 2:14 Your covetous practices shall curse your children. [And today we have burdened our children with unpayable debt that will enslave them. By the way, slavery in the Bible was a 20% income tax during a time of national crisis. Genesis 47:23-26.]
Second Thessalonians 3:10 if any would not work, neither should he eat.
Second Thessalonians 3:12 we command and exhort by our Lord Jesus Christ, that with quietness they work, and eat their own bread.
No one has to provide for you. Why do you want laws that force others to provide for you? This is theft and extortion. In Genesis 3:19 the unchanging God of the Bible requires you to earn your bread from the sweat of your face. This principle was still true when Abraham Lincoln gave his second Inaugural address, March 4, 1865: “It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces…” That’s right. Forced welfare contributions are just as immoral as slavery.
Two systems, pick one: Force, fear and violence Faith, hope and charity.
Don’t confuse government welfare systems with charity. One is done by forcing your neighbors to give; the other is done with love. It is your duty to love your neighbor and be your brother’s keeper. Forcing your neighbor to give is not charity — it is socialism. No form of collectivism can recognize individual rights. If the neighbor cannot give, then their bank account will be seized, their wages garnished, they will be evicted from their home by brutal force and their home sold to collect the tax. This is force, not love. Learn how to spot the difference.
HISTORY OF THE INCOME TAX to tax the rich
New York Times August 3, 1909 front page article announcing the first state to ratify the Income Tax Amendment said:
“The only interruption to his speech was a query by Representative Glover… – who wanted to know if the amendment would affect salaries.”
If you have the same question, then read the response. (link https://www.NotFooledByGovernment.com/essay-files/NYT-front-page-article-on-tax-8-03-1909.pdf ) You may safely ignore the part of the answer that said “unless Congress passed a law including salaries.” because four years later the Senate debates show the intent of Congress.
Senate ratification debates in the Congressional Record, August 28 1913, Senator Lawrence Y. Sherman, on page 3843, debating the income tax amendment, insisted that the word “income” referred only to earnings on savings accounts:
“The savings from the income by professional effort or by any form of skilled labor or unskilled hand becomes property. At the end of any given period that saving is a principal, and any income derived from it is an income from property, not an income from the earning capacity or the personal ability of the taxpayer in question… Those investments that produce an income from a property I think are properly to be distinguished from those arising from the earning capacity of the individual.”
Also on page 3843 Senator Cummins :
“I assume that every lawyer will agree with me that we cannot legislatively interpret the meaning of the word ‘income’. That is purely a judicial matter. We cannot enlarge the meaning of the word ‘income’. The word ‘income’ had a well-defined meaning before the amendment … If we could call anything income that we pleased, we could obliterate all the distinction between income and principal…. Congress can not affect the meaning of the word ‘income’ by any legislation whatsoever…. obviously the people of this country did not intend to give to Congress the power to levy a direct tax upon all the property of this country without apportionment.”
That’s right. There is no apportioned direct tax on anyone. Any income derived from savings accounts becomes taxable, because collecting interest is a government granted privilege.
* Perfect Savages
2150 years ago the Greek historian Polybius wrote:
“But when a new generation arises and the democracy falls into the hands of the grandchildren of its founders, they have become so accustomed to freedom and equality that they no longer value them, and begin to aim at pre-eminence; and it is chiefly those of ample fortune who fall into this error. So when they begin to lust for power and cannot attain it through themselves or their own good qualities, they ruin their estates, tempting and corrupting the people in every possible way. And hence when by their foolish thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, democracy in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. For the people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch.”
— The Histories Of the Roman Republic 220-146 BC, Book 6, section 9
And 2000 years ago Plutarch said “It is truly said that the first destroyer of the liberties of a people is he who gave them bounties and largesse. “
If you want to challenge the loss of your rights, I recommend an online law course for those who will fight against the powers-that-be. It has save me and it might just be your get-out-of-jail card. HowToWinInCourt.com
Steven D. Miller is a freelance writer producing informative Articles, blog posts, ghost writing, newsletters, web pages, case studies, white papers, reports, eBooks and high-density documentaries. He is available to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free. Contact him at Steven.Miller@LibertyContentWriter.com
Under the U.S. Constitution, a wife had no legal rights. A wife’s rights did not come from government. Her covering is her husband. Government had no right to interfere with a man’s family except for (1) extreme cruelty* that endangered the life of a wife or child, or (2) children would be educated at public expense if parents failed to educate their children to his station in life.
But if you got a marriage license, daddy government is your covering. Ask your daddy for whatever legal rights they want to grant to you.
Under the U.S. Constitution a marriage is for life. It cannot be divorced. That’s right. There is no such thing as a living ex-wife or ex-husband.
The U.S. Supreme Court determined in Maynard v. Hill 125 U.S. 205, at pages 211 to 215 that marriage is to be upheld because “marriage is a relation for life.” (this refers to real marriage, not the divorceable type of marriage that needs a license).
But you waived your right to marry by getting a marriage license. If you had managed to keep your rights the answer to your question is found in American law dictionaries :
In the Bible divorce only refers to living separately. Also notice that nowhere in the Bible does the word divorce cancel a marriage.
The Latin word Capitis is a head covering. Diminutio is a taking away, loss or deprivation.
A Christian man is the covering for his family. See First Corinthians 11.
A right cannot be licensed. A marriage license application is a confession that you have no right to marry.
One you confess that you have no right to your family, a civil Roman government is your covering.
Notice in all cases that a man’s family rights are lost. Only in the more severe cases are other legal rights forfeited.
Originally answered by Steven Miller, March 27, 2019.
* FOOTNOTE
According to Black’s Law Dictionary, first edition:
Also related to the topic of cruelty: The husband’s Covering was a wife’s complete protection. Men created a government to help them protect their families. A man is responsible for the crimes committed by his wife. A wife cannot be arrested. A man is to be arrested for the crimes of his wife, so that the wife can stay home and care for the children. Therefore a man has a duty to correct his wife with whatever force is necessary. (By the way, men also have a duty to correct the government he created.)
For those not familiar with the Mark of the Beast of the Bible:
A symbolic “Beast” is a kingdom (according to angels in Daniel 7:24, Daniel 8:20 and in Revelation 17:12). Today we would use the word government.
Daniel 7’s exceedingly dreadful final beast kingdom tramples down the earth, takes away the dominion of other governments, makes war with the saints and prevails against them.
The final government controls the world’s monetary system such that no one can buy or sell without government permission (except for those in Revelation 15:2 who are victorious over the mark). What are the chances that you already have a banking authorization number from an exceedingly dreadful final world government ?
The Mark is an identification needed to buy or sell in the final economic system, either a badge, name (authority), or number– The Biblical book of Revelation at chapter 13, verse 17; “And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” (King James Version)
You may have questioned if marks such as quantum dot tattoos in the skin have something to do with the Mark of The Beast.
The quantum dot vaccine was invented at MIT to deliver vaccines using a patch of microneedles to invisibly encode vaccination history directly into the skin. Their nanocrystals leave fluorescent mineral tatoos long after the vaccine needles have dissolved. These marks can be viewed with infrared cameras, or cell phone cameras with special filters. Some people speculate that there will be three numbers of six digits each.
My thoughts in support of Quantum Dot vaccines being the Mark:
There is a prophecy in Revelation 18:4 where a voice from heaven says, “come out of her my people [and] receive not of her plagues.” Then in verse 23 “for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.”(the original Greek word that the King James translators translated into the 1611 English word “sorceries” was the Greek word pharmakeia — which we would translate into today’s English word pharmacy) — For by thy pharmacy are all nations deceived.
Bill Gates has already told us that digital certificates of immunity would be needed to facilitate the global re-openning of the economy after the COVID lockdowns.
And, of course, the economic system has been under Satanic control ever since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
My thoughts in rebuttal of Quantum Dot vaccines being the Mark:
Many people insist that the Mark has to be an implant in the skin or a tattoo in the skin, or at least a breaking of the skin. I don’t believe it. There is no Biblical requirement for a physical breaking of the skin.
The King James Version translated the Greek word “epi” to the English word “in” or “upon” for the following marks: • in their foreheads (Revelation 7:3) • his mark upon their foreheads, (Revelation 20:4) • or in their hands (Revelation 20:4) • in their right hand (Revelation 13:16) • in their foreheads (Revelation 13:16) • written in their foreheads (Revelation 14:1). The word “epi” is usually translated as “upon”. The King James Version translated the word ‘epi’ both ways in Revelation 20:4. We get our English word “epidermis” from the Greek. We also get our English word “hypodermic” from the Greek. You would never confuse the two English words. Epi-dermis is upon the skin, hypo-dermic is under the skin. In EVERY occurrence of the beast’s mark in your Bible, the mark is epi (upon) the hand and forehead. It is never hypo in the skin.
Many people claim that the mark must be a mark physically in the skin because the English word “Mark” can refer to a physical mark. Quantum Dot Vaccine would certainly qualify. We will examine this possibility below.
There is no Biblical requirement for a physical breaking of the skin. But there may be a symbolic breaking of the skin. After all, the word “covenant”, at least in the Old Testament, refers to a cutting of the skin. And in the New Testament in Acts7:8 the cutting of circumcision is called a covenant, and Hebrews 12:24 covenant and blood are mentioned together. The word “testament” can imply a cutting of the skin, as in Matthew 26:28, Luke 22:20, and 1 Corinthians 11:25 referring to Christ’s blood.
MORE THOUGHTS
The Satanic controlled economy has worked with debt currencies since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. A central bank is the fifth plank of the Communist Manifesto. Communism cannot recognize individual rights.
And we know that credit scores will require government approval of your social media interactions. Just like they do in China today. — So that by 2030 you will need a biometric method to log into the internet. The International Monetary Fund is developing a plan to track your web history to determine credit scores. Download Link: (https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WP/2020/English/wpiea2020161-print-pdf.ashx)
Right Hand or Forehead.
Some people insist that the phrase “hand and forehead” refers to manual work and mental work, therefore taking the mark only refers to working for the beast. I don’t believe it.
Some people insist that it has to be a clearly visible mark or tattoo of Satan’s protection, just as God’s mark protected Cain when he was evicted from Eden, and just as others were marked for protection as in Ezekiel 9:4-6.
Others suggest that the phrase “hand and forehead” refers to acceptance and obedience to the beast. • Or allegiance to the beast. • Or ownership by the beast. • Or saluting the beast authority. • Or simply a mental acceptance and a signature.
Let’s study the Bible and figure out what interpretations make sense and what interpretations can be dismissed.
The last digit in 666 is the word stigma, which comes from a meaning more-than-a-handful. Although the Greek word `stigma’, translated as the last 6 in the number 666 (666= chi-xi-stigma) , it can mean prick (as well as a reference to branding as a mark of ownership) and although the Greek word `charagma’, translated into the English word “mark”, can mean etching (or a badge of servitude), this is not necessarily proof that the mark has to be an implant.
The English word “Mark” refers to a physical mark. • Although it refers to a physical mark, the Greek word Stigma can refer to physical marks that are also designations of ownership, as in a rancher branding his cattle, or an artist signing his work. I have already written about how a Social Security Card is indeed a certificate of ownership. • The English word “Mark” can also mean a scar, as in Galatians 6:17 “…I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.” This is translated from the Greek word `stigma‘, which is not the word “Mark” used in Revelation. Stigma in Strong’s Concordance is defined as “a mark incised or punched for recognition of ownership, i.e. scar of service:-mark”. Notice that its primary meaning of this “stigma” physical mark is as a designation of ownership. Again, the word stigma is the third six in 666. The Greek word for “Mark” in the eight occurrences in Revelation, is the Greek word `charagma‘ (Strong’s G5480) which means an etching or a badge of servitude. The extent of God’s wrath leads us to believe that this is something extraordinary. But grammatically, there is no reason to suspect that this is anything more advanced than a badge, or an ID card — or just a number as allowed by Revelation 13:17. The mark might eventually involve an etching of the skin, as a tattoo or an implant, but I don’t see where the Bible requires it. A Social Security Card already fits this prophecy. A number issued by a foreign power already qualifies you to buy and sell, and none of the other Biblical marks in the right hand or forehead refer to a tattoo or scar or implant. The only other occurrence of the word `charagma‘ in the Bible is translated into the word `graven’ in Acts 17:29.
Forehead symbols
Bus drivers, tea brokers and military all have engraved marks on their forehead as their authority to present themselves in public as representatives of their superiors. In the Bible, the Greek word for authority exousia comes from the root word exon which is the right to present oneself in public. An engraved etching at the forehead has always been a sign of servitude, presenting to the public the master’s authority. The original purpose of the engraved etching was to allow a slave to go to the market and conduct business for his master. The etching was often just an impression of the master’s family seal baked in clay. A badge has always been a symbol of servitude. Today, an ID card in your right hand serves the same purpose as an engraved etching at the forehead.
Do you have a mark, name or number to present yourself in commerce? Such as a banking authorization number to conduct banking? Or a wage authorization number to sell your labor? If so, it is too late to worry about a vaccination. You should have already “come out of her my people [and] receive not of her plagues.”
Fast forward to today: you could be detained if you cannot show ID, and merchants might not conduct commerce without proof that you have some master’s authority to exist. In today’s commercial law this is known as a presentment warranty. As today’s badge of servitude, the Social Security Card, or ID obtained with it, certainly serves this same purpose.
Just like the National Socialists of 1930’s Europe, you will need a mark to enter the marketplace. But this time The wine of the wrath of God shall be poured out, undiluted, into the cup of his indignation and the smoke of their torment shall rise forever, whosoever receives the mark.
And I always recommend an online law course for those who will fight against the powers-that-be. It has save me and it might just be your get-out-of-jail card. HowToWinInCourt.com
— ===== ==== ===== —
Steven D. Miller is a freelance writer producing informative Articles, blog posts, newsletters, web pages, case studies, white papers, reports, eBooks and high-density documentaries. He is available to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free. Contact him at Steven.Miller@LibertyContentWriter.com
Throughout our history, Presidents could not find anything in the U.S. Constitution to allow socialism or any kind of welfare for individuals.
Your Constitution was ratified under the assurance that it would never be interpreted to provide welfare to individuals. To counter those rumors that the “general welfare” clause in the proposed Constitution would authorize any kind of welfare, James Madison, in Federalist Paper #41, explained its clear intent. He stated that it “is an absurdity” to claim that the General Welfare clause confounds or misleads, because this introductory clause is followed by enumeration of specific particulars that explain and qualify the meaning of phrase “general welfare”.
Scene at the Signing of the Constitution of the United States, painting by Howard Chandler Christy
In 1792 congressman and future President James Madison voted against a congressional appropriation to assist war refugees who had fled to America. He said:
“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”
This was still true when Congressman Davy Crockett made his famous “it is not yours to give” speech. It is not their money to give, not even for disaster relief in a federal territory.
In the 1891 naturalization case of Mr. Sauer, Title 81 Federal Reporter page 358, the court held that Mr. Sauer, although an industrious, law abiding man, could not become a citizen because he claimed to be a Socialist. That’s right. SOCIALISTS CAN NOT BECOME U.S. CITIZENS.
President Franklin Pierce in 1854 vetoed a health care bill to help the mentally ill. His veto said:
“I cannot find any authority in the Constitution for public charity…. [this] would be contrary to the letter and the spirit of the Constitution and subversive to the whole theory upon which the Union of these States is founded.”
Abraham Lincoln, September 11, 1858:
“Accustomed to trampling on the rights of others you have lost the genius of your own independence and become the fit subjects of the first cunning tyrant who rises among you.”
Abraham Lincoln, second Inaugural Address, 1865:
“It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces …”
Grover Cleveland’s veto of government pensions, June 21, 1886:
“… encourages those who for gain urge honest men to become dishonest. This is the demoralizing lesson taught [to] the people … against the public Treasury …”
1897 President Grover Cleveland vetoed an appropriation to provide disaster aid to victims of a Texas drought. His veto stated:
“I feel obliged to withhold my approval of the plan to indulge in benevolent and charitable sentiment through the appropriation of public funds… I find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution. The lesson should be constantly enforced that though the people should support the government, the government should not support the people.”
Note: 1897 was 2 years after the Supreme Court ruled that income tax was unconstitutional in Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan Co. (157 US 429, and 158 U.S. 601)
Teddy Roosevelt speech to the New York City Chamber of Commerce November 11, 1902:
“the traditional American self-reliance of spirit which makes them scorn to ask from the government, whether of State or of Nation, anything but a fair field and no favor; who confide not in being helped by others, but in their own skill, energy, and business capacity to achieve success. The first requisite of a good citizen in this Republic of ours is that he shall be able and willing to pull his weight that he shall not be a mere passenger, but shall do his share in the work that each generation of us finds ready to hand; and, furthermore, that in doing his work he shall show not only the capacity for sturdy self-help but also self-respecting regard for the rights of others.”
Socialism cannot recognize individual rights. You cannot covet your neighbor’s wealth and expect to have rights to your own wealth.
1.They created a federal government and they must be held responsible for controlling what they created. The 17th Amendment now prohibits them from controlling what they created.
2. A court that flies the gold fringed US flag is not a judicial court. It is a federal martial law legislative tribunal. Start with my essay Gold Fringed Flag.
3. State judicial courts must protect their people from the gold fringed flag courts. The citizen who cannot complain is the individual who owes allegiance to two governments. According to The Supreme Court in U.S. v Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 at page 551,
4. People in states are subject to only three federal laws. The three crimes mentioned in the US Constitution. “and no other crimes whatever” according to vice-President Jefferson in the Kentucky Resolutions.
5. States can no longer control the creature they created. Example: 1968 Utah Supreme Court decision in Dyett v. Turner, 439 P.2d 266 has a critical examination of the problems of the 14th Amendment. The Utah Supreme Court justices said “We feel like galley slaves chained to our oars by a power from which we cannot free ourselves, but like slaves of old we think we must cry out when we can see the boat heading into the maelstrom directly ahead of us”.
Local judges are not controlled by their State. They are federally controlled. Judges in every State are bound thereby (U.S. Constitution Article 6, second paragraph).
6. IRS definition of citizen in Title 26 Code of Federal Regulations section 1.1-1(c) is that of a 14th Amendment federal citizen, not a state citizen. State citizens are protected from the federal government by the state judicial court, not the federal gold fringed flag courts. See my essay Why we don’t have rights anymore.
Who is a citizen? The IRS uses the same definition of the 14th Amendment.
7. By getting a SSN you disavow any allegiance to a State government. Once a 14th Amendment citizen, always a 14th Amendment citizen — your State citizenship was “finally disavowed” are the words in the Expatriation Act — in other words once you volunteer you cannot expatriate from the federal prison you volunteered into. This explains why US citizens are taxed everywhere in the world they move to. More info is in my essay Why don’t we have rights anymore? In my essay I explain why the expatriation Act was passed the day before they ratified the 14th Amendment. Once you jump the fence into the federal government, you cannot jump back.* This is why the U.S. is one of the two countries on the globe that taxes their citizens wherever they are located.
Do not misread the Expatriation Act. (Link — chapter 249 starts near the bottom of page 223) The Act says: “This claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed:…”
Once you expatriate from the [foreign] State of the Union by seeking federal benefits, your allegiance to the foreign State of the Union is “promptly and finally disavowed”, They can no longer protect you from the federal government.
* James Madison correctly explained in his 1800 Report on the Virginia Resolutions: the term “states” means the people composing those political societies, in their highest sovereign capacity; because
in that sense the Constitution was submitted to the “states;”
in that sense the “states” ratified it; and
in that sense of the term “states,” they are consequently parties to the compact from which the powers of the federal government result.
So nothing changed with the Constitution, regarding any state’s national sovereignty; i.e. they were stilleach “a people composing those political societies in their highest sovereign capacity,” i.e. a sovereign nation-state, and were simply parties to an international union on that basis.
A free country is one that allows it’s people to leave. Are you free?
An oath of citizenship, according to the Department of Homeland Security 8 CFR 337, is a commitment to “perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; …”. This is unlimited perpetual slavery. Your forced labor is collateral for the national debt. Your debt to society must be paid. Your allegiance was turned over to the creditors (by lawyers). You are permanently obligated until you pay your debt to society.
Passport laws in Title 22, Persons entitled to passport Chapter 4 Section 212 states:
“No passport shall be granted or issued to or verified for any other persons than those owing allegiance, whether citizens or not, to the United States.”
22 U.S. Code § 212
This includes a National of the United States according to :
“The term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.”
— 8 USC 1101 (22)
If we read the Application for passport; verification by oath of initial passport, in Title 22, Chapter 4, § 213. we also see that:
“Before a passport is issued to any person by or under authority of the United States such person shall subscribe to and submit a written application which shall contain a true recital of each and every matter of fact which may be required by law or by any rules authorized by law to be stated as a prerequisite to the issuance of any such passport. If the applicant has not previously been issued a United States passport, the application shall be duly verified by his oath before a person authorized and empowered by the Secretary of State to administer oaths.”
— 22 U.S. Code § 213
A national is not a citizen but still owes permanent allegiance. Permanent allegiance does not change. The conferring of nationality (which does not give the rights of citizenship) also requires oaths of allegiance. Title 8 U.S. Code § 1452 – Certificates of citizenship or U.S. non-citizen national status; (b) Application to Secretary of State for certificate of non-citizen national status; proof; oath of allegiance taking and subscribing, before an immigration officer within the United States or its outlying possessions, to the oath of allegiance required by this chapter of a petitioner for naturalization, the individual shall be furnished by the Secretary of State with a certificate of non-citizen national status, but only if the individual is at the time within the United States or its outlying possessions. [1452b section 341 b 308 confers nationality but not citizenship. 101 a21, a22, 29]
Those who receive not a love for the truth shall receive strong delusion that they should believe a lie.
None are so hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters
There are many revisions of The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 According to Title 8 USC §1101: Definitions Text
§1101. Definitions
(a) As used in this chapter-
(1) The term “administrator” means the official designated by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 1104(b) of this title. (2) The term “advocates” includes, but is not limited to, advises, recommends, furthers by overt act, and admits belief in. (3) The term “alien” means any person not a citizen or national of the United States. … 12) The term “doctrine” includes, but is not limited to, policies, practices, purposes, aims, or procedures. 14) The term “foreign state” includes outlying possessions of a foreign state, but self-governing dominions or territories under mandate or trusteeship shall be regarded as separate foreign states. 15) The term “immigrant” means every alien except an alien who is within one of the following classes of nonimmigrant aliens- (A)(i) an ambassador, public minister, …. (22) The term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. 30) The term “passport” means any travel document issued by competent authority showing the bearer’s origin, identity, and nationality if any, which is valid for the admission of the bearer into a foreign country. 31) The term “permanent” means a relationship of continuing or lasting nature, as distinguished from temporary, but a relationship may be permanent even though it is one that may be dissolved eventually at the instance either of the United States or of the individual, in accordance with law. 36) The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
Section 101(a)(21) of the INA defines the term “national” as “a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.” Section 101(a)(22) of the INA provides that the term “national of the United States” includes all U.S. citizens as well as persons who, though not citizens of the United States, owe permanent allegiance to the United States (non-citizen nationals).”
Section 308 INA confers U.S. nationality but not U.S. citizenship, on persons born in “an outlying possession of the United States” or born of a parent or parents who are non-citizen nationals who meet certain physical presence or residence requirements. The term “outlying possessions of the United States” is defined in Section 101(a)(29) of the INA as American Samoa and Swains Island. No other statutes define any other territories or any of the states as outlying possessions.”
“In addition to Section 308 of the INA, Section 302 of Public Law 94 – 241 provides for certain inhabitants of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, who became United States citizens by virtue of Article III of the Covenant, to opt for non-citizen national status. (See requirements of Section 302).”
“As the Department has received few requests, there is no justification for the creation of a non-citizen national certificate. Designing a separate document that includes anti-fraud mechanisms was seen as an inefficient expenditure of resources. Therefore, the Department determined that those who would be eligible to apply for such a certificate may instead apply for a United States passport that would delineate and certify their status as a national but not a citizen of the United States.”
“If a person believes he or she is eligible under the law as a non-citizen national of the United States and the person complies with the provisions of section 341(b) of the INA, 8 USC 1452(b),he/she may apply for a passport at any Passport Agency in the United States.. When applying, applicants must execute a Form DS-11 and show documentary proof of their non-citizen national status as well as their identity.”
If you want to be free, don’t agree to pay the national debt.
The Constitution was constituted by constitutors. Oh, my.
You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. — Ayn Rand
Here are the consequences of ignoring reality
If you are not there to help others, others will not be there to help you when you need help.
Keep doing what you are doing and history will repeat millennia of misery.
Forced charity has never been sustainable
Forced welfare is NOT welfare. It is theft by force, fear and violence. Real charity is to love your neighbor as yourself. Learn to spot the difference.
And 2000 years ago Plutarch said “It is truly said that the first destroyer of the liberties of a people is he who gave them bounties and largesse. “
2150 years ago Greek Historian Polybius wrote The Histories Of the Roman Republic 220-146 BC, Book 6, section 9:
“And hence when by their foolish thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, democracy in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. For the people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch.” link: http://www.uvm.edu/~bsaylor/classics/polybius6.html or http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius/6*.html
Ben Franklin, closing speech at the Constitutional Convention, September 17, 1787:
“I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of Government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other.”
Six years after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to rule on the constitutionality of Social Security, they agreed to use the common understanding of who qualifies for government welfare. In the 1941 Supreme Court case Edwards v. California at 314 US 160 at 172 , the legal term “indigent person” was given a very limited scope:
“…must be taken to include only persons who are presently destitute of property and without resources to obtain the necessities of life, and who have no relatives or friends able and willing to support them.”
In other words, forced charity is only legal to save the life of a pauper. Freeloaders cannot qualify. If you applied for a SS number, you confessed that you cannot manage your own life.
Before the Constitution was constituted under the Articles of Confederation, paupers had no rights of citizenship. They had the same rights as a fugitive. And it remains true today that paupers (those with a SSN), have no more rights than a fugitive.
Welfare entitlement is available only to save the life of the applicant. There is no Constitutional authority for individual welfare. But Treasury funds can be used to save a life. SS Cards can only be issued to one who is an “applicant for or recipient of benefits under any program financed in whole or in part by Federal funds” according to Title 42 US Code 405(c)(2)(B)(i).
Lose your illusions.
You are dependent on the agenda of others
You are completely dependent on those who control the foundations that you rely on. This is the very definition of Stockholm Syndrome. Just like the early Christians, and today’s Amish, you will need to join a like-minded community to provide the foundations of your own making, without reliance on “the powers that be.”
Your foundations are all provided by the Globalists. Jobs, food, healthcare, energy, banking, justice, education, travel. All these are controlled by regulations of the Powers That Be to justify their “requirement” for safety. But safety is not our heritage.
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
— Ben Franklin quote inscribed on a plaque in the stairwell of the Statute of Liberty
We hold the truth that we are created equal.
Equals will not salute other equals. Equals will not bow down to other equals. Equals will never swear oaths to other equals.
“If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. … Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”
— Samuel Adams speech at the State House of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (1 August 1776) Sam was a signer of the Declaration of Independence, cousin of President John Adams, and an activist at the Boston Tea Party
Obedience to authority?
“Those who already walk submissively will say there is no cause for alarm. But submissiveness is not our heritage. The First Amendment was designed to allow rebellion to remain as our heritage. … “
— US Supreme Court, Laird v. Tatum, 408 US 1, page 28
