The REAL American Revolution

The real American Revolution was the radical change in the views of the people in the years before the War for independence.

“The war? That was no part of the revolution. It was only an effect and consequence of it. The Revolution was in the Minds of the People, and this was effected, from 1760 to 1775, in the course of fifteen years before a drop of blood was drawn at Lexington.”
— John Adams letter to Thomas Jefferson, August 24, 1815

He went on to say:

“public opinion was enlightened and informed concerning the authority of Parliament over the Colonies”

That’s right. The people have final authority over government. NOT the other way around.
After all, we the people are the jura summa imperii.

“The Revolution was in the Minds and Hearts of the People, and in the Union of the Colonies, both of which were Substantially effected before Hostilities commenced.”
— John Adams letter to Jedidiah Morse, November 29, 1815

“But what do We mean by the American Revolution? Do We mean the American War? The Revolution was effected before the War commenced. The Revolution was in the Minds and Hearts of the People. A Change in their Religious Sentiments of their Duties and Obligations. While the King, and all in Authority under him, were believed to govern, in Justice and Mercy according to the Laws and Constitutions derived to them from the God of Nature, and transmitted to them by their Ancestors— they thought themselves bound to pray for the King and Queen and all the Royal Family, and all the Authority under them, as Ministers ordained of God for their good. But when they Saw those Powers renouncing all the Principles of Authority, and bent up on the destruction of all the Securities of their Lives, Liberties and Properties, they thought it their Duty to pray for the Continental Congress and all the thirteen State Congresses, &c.”
— John Adams letter to Hezekiah Niles, February 13, 1818

The real American revolution was the change in the people’s opinions about tyrants. Not the war.

When will you take a stand?

John Locke's Second Treatise was the basis for the Declaration of Independence


Why did America choose a federal form of government?

Why did America choose a federal form of government?

Answer: It was forced on us.

“Liberty, sir, was then the primary object.”

“We are descended from a people whose government was founded on liberty; our glorious forefathers of Great Britain made liberty the foundation of everything. That country is become a great, mighty, and splendid nation; not because their government is strong and energetic, but, sir, because liberty is its direct end and foundation. We drew the spirit of liberty from our British ancestors; by that spirit we have triumphed over every difficulty. But now, sir, the American spirit, assisted by the ropes and chains of consolidation, is about to convert this country into a powerful and mighty empire. If you make the citizens of this country agree to become the subjects of one great consolidated empire of America, your government will not have sufficient energy to keep them together. Such a government is incompatible with the genius of republicanism. There will be no checks, no real balances, in this government.”
— Patrick Henry, speech in the Virginia Convention on June 5, 1788 urging for a Bill of Rights

Liberty Bell is inscribed with Leviticus 25:10
Leviticus 25:10 Proclaim Liberty Throughout the Land.

Juneteenth — a day to reflect on your slave status

At birth, are we state citizens or are we automatically U.S. citizens under the 14th Amendment?

Answer: No. Citizenship is political allegiance. We are all created equal with unalienable rights that governments are instituted among men to secure.

John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, which was the foundation for most of the Declaration of Independence, in his Chapter 6 “Paternal rights”, says that a child is not subject to legislated laws until he is old enough to make binding contracts. He said in paragraph 57: “for nobody can be under a law, which is not promulgated to him” and later in paragraph 73 when children become 21 years old they can choose which government to place themselves under, and, according to paragraph 62, this cannot happen until they have the recognized right to take binding oaths of allegiance.

At birth, you are subject to your father’s coverture. If the state finds out that you exist, they might consider you to be an inhabitant. After all, they count infants in the census. The received-law-of-the-land, in the Articles of Confederation, Article 4, says that inhabitants have the same rights as a citizen.

Articles of Confederation and perpetual union
Articles of Confederation and perpetual union between the States

US Supreme Court in 1941 (6 years after the Social Security Act) Edwards v. California, 314 US 172, at the bottom of page 183 “birth within a state does not establish citizenship thereof.”
You have to apply for federal citizenship.
Kitchens v. Steel, 112 F.Supp 383: “A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government”

Notice the words of the 14th Amendment “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” — which is different than the 13th Amendment’s “subject to their jurisdiction” — plural states prior to the 14th, singular federal government in and after the 14th. It is a totally new kind of citizenship — created by and subject to the federal government. No longer subject to the states that created the federal government.

Also notice that the word “Citizen” is ALWAYS capitalized prior to the 14th Amendment, and always lower case thereafter.

The 14th Amendment is one of the Martial Law amendments.
Prior to the 13th Amendment there were three types of Martial Law (see Luther v. Borden, 1849), but the 13th added another Martial Law Rule with section 2 “Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”
This is legislative enforcement is required in 8 of the Amendments (13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 23, 24, 26)
They are enforced in LEGISLATIVE TRIBUNALS. (allowed by Article 1, section 8. DO NOT confuse these with judicial courts of Article 3.) AND JUDGES IN EVERY STATE SHALL BE BOUND THEREBY (Article 6, second paragraph) even if they are contrary to State Constitutions.

We are still under Martial Law Rule.

The 14th Amendment allowed freed slaves, and anyone else, to seek federal benefits. Back then it was the Freedmen’s Bureau. Now it is Social Security.

The Expatriation Act of 1868 was passed the day prior to the ratification of the 14th Amendment.
It allows federal welfare for anyone who becomes a citizen (lower case c citizen of the 14th Amendment).
The Expatriation Act says: “This claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed:…”
Once you expatriate from the [foreign State of the Union, to the federal government] by seeking federal benefits, your allegiance to the foreign State of the Union is “promptly and finally disavowed” This is why the U.S. is one of the two countries on the globe that taxes their citizens wherever they are located.

Furthermore, you can no longer have standing in any court to complain about how your slave status.


Don’t be fooled by any authority of benefactors

Don’t be fooled by any authority of benefactors.

Christ commanded his followers (Christians) to NOT have a top-down government of benefactors. Luke 22:2-26.

Once you take a government benefit, you become subject to your benefactor.[1][2]

The Expatriation Act of 1868 was passed into law the day before the 14th Amendment was ratified. It allowed anyone (such as freed slaves) to take federal benefits, and become “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”.[3]

Once you apply for a federal benefit under the 14th Amendment, you “promptly and finally disavowed” any State allegiance — according to the Expatriation Act.

Don’t say that you didn’t know. You were warned in Romans 11:9 (repeating Psalm 69:22) that welfare would be a snare to trap you.


1. Blackstone’s Commentaries: “a state of dependence will inevitably oblige the inferior to take the will of him, on whom he depends, …”

2. Every Law Dictionary will tell you that Libertinum ingratum leges civiles in pristinam servitutem redigunt. “The civil laws reduce an ungrateful freeman to his original servitude”. Maybe you think this law does not apply to you. Maybe you think that you are not a slave. Think again.

3. You voluntarily entered the federal government when you signed a federal form. This made you “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”. (Quote from U.S. Supreme Court’s Elk v. Wilkins 112 U.S. 94). The Supreme Court continued. It explained the extent to which you must be subject – “not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to…”.

Beware of Representatives who do not represent you

Beware of your Congressional Representatives who do not represent you.
They betray the trust you gave them. In the ultimate betrayal they sold you to foreigners.

Example: if you elect Bar Attornies to the legislature, they have allegiance to their foreign masters. The legislated laws cannot be copyrighted. The law books are published by lawyers, and are copyrighted. If your representative enacts a change to your state’s codified laws, instead of the statutes at large, he is committing mutiny against the trust you gave him.

Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, 1690:

“Sec. 22. THE natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on
earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to
have only the law of nature for his rule. The liberty of man, in society, is
to be under no other legislative power, but that established, by consent, in
the commonwealth; nor under the dominion of any will, or restraint of any
law, but what that legislative shall enact, according to the trust put in
it. Freedom then is not what Sir Robert Filmer tells us, Observations, A.
55. a liberty for every one to do what he lists, to live as he pleases, and
not to be tied by any laws: but freedom of men under government is, to have
a standing rule to live by, common to every one of that society, and made by
the legislative power erected in it; a liberty to follow my own will in all
things, where the rule prescribes not; and not to be subject to the
inconstant, uncertain, unknown, arbitrary will of another man: as freedom of
nature is, to be under no other restraint but the law of nature.”

“Sec. 141. Fourthly, The legislative cannot transfer the power of making laws
to any other hands: for it being but a delegated power from the people, they
who have it cannot pass it over to others. The people alone can appoint the
form of the common-wealth, which is by constituting the legislative, and
appointing in whose hands that shall be. And when the people have said, We
will submit to rules, and be governed by laws made by such men, and in such
forms, no body else can say other men shall make laws for them; nor can the
people be bound by any laws, but such as are enacted by those whom they have
chosen, and authorized to make laws for them. The power of the legislative,
being derived from the people by a positive voluntary grant and institution,
can be no other than what that positive grant conveyed, which being only to
make laws, and not to make legislators, the legislative can have no power to
transfer their authority of making laws, and place it in other hands.”

Even Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Law, Book 4, explains that that rights protect us from every known method of compulsion. [ link to an 1803 revision that includes American law ]

“The rights themselves, thus defined by these several statutes, consist in a number of private immunities, which will appear, from what has been premised, to be indeed no other, than either that residuum of natural liberty, which is not required by the laws of society to be sacrificed to public convenience; or else those civil privileges, which society hath engaged to provide, in lieu of the natural liberties so given up by individuals. These, therefore, were formerly, either by inheritance or purchase, the rights of all mankind; but, in most other countries of the world being now more or less debased and destroyed, they at present may be said to remain, in a peculiar and emphatical manner, the rights of the people of England. And these may be reduced to three principal or primary articles; the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right of private property: because, as there is no other known method of compulsion, or of abridging man’s natural free will, but by an infringement or diminution of one or other of these important rights, the preservation of these, inviolate, may justly be said to include the preservation of our civil immunities in their largest and most extensive sense. “

If government does not protect you from compulsion, perhaps you would want to find out why.

William Blackstone plaque in the U.S. Capitol House Chamber.


Biden’s “government” is NOT a government.

Biden’s “government” is NOT a government.

Real Government controls its officers. Biden (or his handlers) have no government authority to control those who do not swear an oath-of-office to faithfully uphold the Constitution.

The law (Title 5, U.S. Code, section 3331) requires elected or appointed officials to swear oaths to support, defend and bear true faith and allegiance* to the Constitution of United States. It requires a very specific oath.

Title 5, section 3332 requires a signed and notarized oath of office to be filed within 30 days.

U.S. Attorney Todd Calendar and his team at Project Proper Oath, found that NOT A SINGLE CABINET MEMBER has an oath of office that meets the requirements of law.

Without an oath, there is no government authority. There is no chain of command.

Janet Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury has no oath of office.
Lloyd Austin, Secretary of Defense, has no oath of office.
Merrick Garland, Attorney General, has no oath of office.
Antony Blinken, Secretary of State, has no oath of office.
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, has no oath of office.
Pete Buttigieg, Secretary of Transportation, has no oath of office.
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, has no oath of office.
Jack Smith, special investigator of J6 Capitol protestors, has no oath of office.
Matthew Graves, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, chief prosecutor of J6 protestors, has no oath of office.
Vice President Kamala Harris has no oath of office.

On January 10, 1963, there were 45 Communist goals published in the Congressional Record. Number 13 was to do away with loyalty oaths.

  • There can be no insubordination unless there are subordinates.
  • If there is no allegiance* there are no subordinates.
  • Without a chain of command, there can be no crime of mutiny.

MU’TINYnoun [Latin muto, to change.]

“An insurrection of soldiers or seamen against the authority of their commanders; open resistance of officers or opposition to their authority.”
“acts of individuals, amounting to a resistance of the authority or lawful commands of officers, are declared to be mutiny ”

— Websters Dictionary

al·​le·​giance ə-ˈlē-jən(t)s
: the obligation of a feudal vassal to his liege lord
: the fidelity owed by a subject or citizen to a sovereign or government
I pledge allegiance to my country.
: the obligation of an alien to the government under which the alien resides

: devotion or loyalty to a person, group, or cause

What are you going to do about it?


Government Overreach
“We The People” now means nothing to the civil servants
John Locke’s Second Treatise Of Government has as his last chapter, the topic of Dissolution of Government:
“The suggestion that government would not obey the laws would be “politics inconceivable to human capacity, and inconsistent with human society.”
— If this doesn’t describe your Land of the Free, find out why.

Why would Obama support Biden?

Barack Hussein Obama in a 12 16 2019 private event in Singapore* attended by thousands, proudly announced:
“If you look at the world and look at the problems, it’s usually old people, usually old men, not getting out of the way,”
* By the way, he lived in Indonesia as a child raised in the Muslim faith, under the name Barry Soetoro (according to records from his Indonesian elementary school). This was long before he joined Rev. Wright’s “God damn America” church. I thought that Muslims could kill anyone who switched to another religion. Why would he risk going there?
And the SSN he used later in life was issued from Connecticut while he was a 9 year old living in Indonesia, who had never been to Connecticut and was not using the Obama name. How did he do that?

Constitution Quiz

Today is Constitution Day. The U.S. Constitution is 236 years old.

On September 17, 1787, all 12 state delegations (not 13) approve the Constitution. 39 delegates sign it of the 42 present.

The U.S. Constitution does not supersede the Articles of Confederation.
The U.S. Constitution was written to discharge Ben Franklin’s 18 million livre war debt. The Constitution was constituted by constitutors. Oh my.

Black’s Law Dictionary definition of Constitutor

Constitution Quiz — How well do you really know the U.S. Constitution?

Which one of the following words is in the U.S. Constitution?


Government Overreach

Update your water rights

Wetland regulations must now become more reasonable due to the recent Supreme Court ruling.

The EPA was wrong. The Supreme Court is right. Land is not water.

Five years ago, I wrote an essay on how wacko our water rights are.

Water Rights

Three years ago, I wrote an essay on how absurd and cruel the EPA is on regulating wetlands.

Wetland regulations are out of control

But last week, the Supreme Court did the right thing. Here are some links:

EPA’s authority over wetlands is at stake as justices wade back into regulatory morass

Supreme Court curtails Clean Water Act

Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency



Something is fishy in the U.S. fishing industry

water drop 

U.S. v. Burlington, etc., Ferry Co. (1884) 21 Fed. Rep.334.

“Constitution and statutes must concur. …
In order to give jurisdiction to a federal court in any case whatever, the Constitution and the statute law must concur. It is not sufficient that the jurisdiction may be found in the Constitution or the law. The two must co-operate; the Constitution as the fountain, and the law of Congress as the streams from which and through which the waters of jurisdiction flow to the court”.

FDR’s New Deal was Martial Law

90 years ago today, FDR declared an emergency, by using Martial Law — It was called The New Deal.

His Martial Law is still in effect today.

In 1973 the U.S. Senate investigated the possibility of terminating the national emergency, but did not teminate it.

According to Senate Report 93-549, written in 1973:

“Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and control the lives of all American citizens”

Many people think that the right of Habeas Corpus must be suspended to have Martial Law. But this is not true, see Article 1, section 9.

Many people think that Martial Law must be declared, but this is not true. In Lincoln’s Martial Law manual, government guns in the street is sufficient notice of Martial Law.  In the old days, back when we had liberty, it was never a government function to kill someone without a trial. If an officer wanted to protect himself, he can provide his own weapon.

After FDR socialists confiscated our gold (our only lawful money) in 1933 (based on the guise of controlling a banker created depression) the FDR socialists on March 9, 1933, removed domestic transactions from the exclusions to the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act (40 Stat L. 411). Trading with the Enemy is always illegal. Prior to March 9, 1933 domestic transactions were always legal. After March 9, 1933 all domestic transactions are illegal. We are the enemy of the occupation forces. Again: trading with the enemy is always illegal, but now our domestic trading is with the enemy of your foreign masters. Domestic transactions can now be regulated and punished. I repeat: domestic transactions are illegal. It is illegal to buy or sell in America unless your transactions are with a surrendered person. It is lawful to trade with surrendered people. It is illegal to trade with the unsurrendered enemy. But guess who surrendered.

Details: The March 9th 1933 national emergency referred to by that Senate report amended in Section 1, the authority of the Trading With The Enemy Act of October 6th, 1917. FDR signed into law on March 9, 1933, chapter 1, Title 1, Sec. 1, 48 Stat. 1:

“Subdivision (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L 441), as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: … during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, … payments by banking institutions as defined by the President, …, by any person within the United States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof…”

“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6th, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved and confirmed.”

Notice that this Treasury Law was set out in Title 50 of the U.S. Code, the War title.

Here is a link to the 1917 Trading With the Enemy Act before it was amended by FDR socialists in 1933.  []


For more information:
How to recognize Martial Law when you see it.