Now that one-fifth of Americans are unemployed by a national shutdown, people are noticing their loss of rights. People are trained throughout their lives to ignore reality.
Governors have temporary emergency powers as delegated by your State’s Constitution — such as are needed to quickly react to forest fires, riots, pandemics or invasion. These are temporary until congress has a chance to convene to create laws and appropriate treasury funds to deal with the emergency.
I’m not a lawyer, but it seems obvious to me that yes, governors can temporarily keep you from working until congress convenes. But your state must pay you for lost wages — for three reasons: compensation for taken property, compensatory damages for lost liberty and punitive damages for impairing the obligation of contracts.
YOUR LABOR IS A PROPERTY RIGHT.
Property cannot be taken without just compensation.
Not only are wages a property right but they are THE MOST SACRED RIGHT according to the U.S. Supreme Court. Try to find similar court decisions in your state.
U.S. Supreme Court in Butcher’s Union v. Crescent City 111U.S. 746:
“The property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. … to hinder his employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper without injury to his neighbor, is a plain violation of this most sacred property.”
Do you still have “the most sacred and inviolable” right to your labor, which is “the original foundation of all other property”? Or did you voluntarily wave your right to earn wages by acquiescing to a power grab?
YOUR LABOR IS A LIBERTY
U.S. Supreme Court partial definition of liberty in Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, at page 399. The term Liberty
“… denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint, but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, to establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his/her own conscience… the established doctrine is that this liberty may not be interfered with under the guise of protecting public interest, by legislative action which is arbitrary or without reasonable relation to some purpose within the competency of the state to effect.”
And just what is arbitrary? Just ask yourself either of these two questions:
if you had “equal protection of the laws”
if you were “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
And just what is a “reasonable relation to some purpose within the competency of the state to effect”?
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, first amendment rights can be restricted only to prevent grave and immediate danger to someone’s life, liberty or property.
“… freedoms of speech and of press, of assembly, and of worship may not be infringed on such slender grounds. They are susceptible of restriction only to prevent grave and immediate danger to interests which the state may lawfully protect” (This phrase was used in many Supreme Court decisions to protect your rights. Carrol v. Princess Anne 393 U.S. 175, Thomas v. Collins 323 U.S. 516, West Virginia v. Barnette 319 U.S. 624, in re Brown 9 Cal.3d 612, West’s Constitutional law, key 84, 90, 91 — etc.)
We no longer have the justice that government was created to protect. Courts once had a duty to render to every man his due.
In fictione juris semper cequitas existit:
A legal fiction is always consistent with Equity.
— 11 Rep. 51.
If you are interested in justice I recommend these books:
Justitia est constans et perpetua voluntas jus suum cuique tribunendi.
Justice is a steady and unceasing disposition to render to every man his due.
Your State’s Constitution should say that congress shall make no law establishing religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
But can a governor ban religion by prohibiting the free exercise thereof?
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. I believe that tyranny must be resisted, and that acquiescence waives your right to complain. Resistance is not futile. Do not be assimilated.
The right to free exercise of religion is a God-given right. The Declaration of independence says that the laws of nature’s God entitle the United States to exist. It then goes on to declare that governments are instituted among men to secure Creator-endowed unalienable rights.
And since government is instituted to protect rights, you have a Constitutionally guaranteed, government protected, right to worship together*. It is protected until waived. A right must be protected. Government was created – “instituted among men” was the phrase used in the Declaration of Independence – to protect rights. Ordained was the religious term they used to establish your State’s Constitution.
* Christ himself gave his followers a command. In the only ministry event that is recorded in all four gospels, He told us to sit down in groups of fifty.
Can a governor prohibit what the Bible commands? Hebrews 10:25 tell us “Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, ”
The Apostle Peter told us to obey God, not men in Acts 5:29.
Secret societies are running the government from behind the scenes. We call them the deep state.
Yet conspiracy theories have become a taboo subject.
PRESIDENT KENNEDY’S SECRET-SOCIETY SPEECH
President Kennedy warned us about secret societies and asked for our help in “the tremendous task” of alerting the American people about a “ruthless conspiracy”.
Here are some quotes from JFK’s “The President and the Press” speech to the Newspaper Publishers, 27 April 1961 (source)
•“The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings”
•“Today no war has been declared — and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack”
•“We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence — on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day”
•“It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations”
•“… I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed. “
•“… we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.”
JFK’s warning was only three months after
PRESIDENT EISENHOWER’S WARNING in his farewell address:
“ …Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, …. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted.”
Unfortunately for us, these Presidential alarms about being dominated by secret societies were suppressed.
PRESIDENT WOODROW WILSON’S WARNING ABOUT SECRET SOCIETIES
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
“They know that America is not a place of which it can be said, as it used to be, that a man may choose his own calling and pursue it just as far as his abilities enable him to pursue it; because to-day, if he enters certain fields, there are organizations which will use means against him that will prevent his building up a business which they do not want to have built up; organizations that will see to it that the ground is cut from under him and the markets shut against him. For if he begins to sell to certain retail dealers, to any retail dealers, the monopoly will refuse to sell to those dealers, and those dealers, afraid, will not buy the new man’s wares.”
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter know of the conspiracy that controlled the nation:
“The real rulers of a nation are undiscoverable.” — quoted in an article titled “Globalists Run U.S., Says Sen. Malone” in the Chicago Daily Tribune, April 25, 1949, p. 1
Felix Frankfurter was one of the founders of the ACLU
PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH BOASTED OF HIS SECRET SOCIETY
In his 1999 campaign autobiography, A Charge to Keep, George W. Bush mentions his membership in Skull and Bones only in passing: “My senior year I joined Skull and Bones, a secret society, so secret I can’t say anything more.”
Comedian George Carlin:
Do I believe in conspiracies? Nah. Do I believe powerful people would get together and plan for certain outcomes? Nah. Do I believe powerful interests would operate outside the law, maybe even kill people? Nah. Do I believe that secret government agencies might feel the need to assassinate a person and cover it up. Nah. I think everything in America is open, clean, and above board, and powerful people always play by the rules.– George Carlin
The $2.2 Trillion CARES Act* bailout is $10,200 per taxpayer.
The government could have given every taxpayer over $10,000 that it borrowed from your children’s future tax payments, but instead it will give only $1,200 to some people.
Where is the missing 96% of our tax dollars?
Pelosi was House Majority leader during the Obama 2009 H1N1 virus outbreak. Obama’s Chief of Staff during the 2009 H1N1 virus outbreak, Rahm Emanuel, is known for his quote “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”
With the new Coronavirus opportunity, Pelosi wasted no time pushing her radical agenda. The Senate was able to remove the Pelosi wish list items for abortion funding, election day registration of illegals (needing only a signature to vote, without proof of citizenship), 50% reduction of emissions from planes, and many other wacko agendas that have nothing to do with the pandemic or the shutdown.
BUT look at what Pelosi was able to push through the Senate:
$300 Million for migrant and refugee assistance (pg. 147).
$10,000 per person for student loan bailout
(to spit in the face of every student who worked hard to save up for tuition).
$100 Million to NASA,
$10,000,000,000 to the U.S. Postal Service
($10 Billion seems excessive to me, for delivery service that UPS and FedEx make a profit ).
$75,000,000 to the Endowment for the Arts
$75,000,000 for the Endowment for the Humanities
$17,200,000,000 for the Veterans Health Administration.
$30 Billion for the Department of Education Stabilization Fund.
$200,000,000 to Safe Schools Emergency Response to Violence Program.
$300,000,000 to Public Broadcasting
$500,000,000 to museums and libraries
$338,000,000 to the Social Security Administration– for administrative costs only, not for helping people.
$25,000,000 cleaning supplies for the Capitol Building (on page 136).
(For $25 Million in cleaning supplies, I can suggest what the Capitol Building needs to clean).
$7,500,000 to the Smithsonian for additional salaries.
$25,000,000 to the John F. Kennedy Center for Performing Arts.
$25,000,000 for necessary expenses for the House of Representatives.
$2.15 Billion upgrade to the IT department at the Department of Veteran Affairs.
(be grateful it didn’t go to the IRS).
$324,000,000 for State Department Diplomatic Programs.
$363,000,000 for the Agency for International Development.
$258,000,000 for International Disaster Assistance.
$90,000,000 for the Peace Corp (pg. 148).
$4,036,000 to Howard University – (Kamala Harris’ alma mater – pg. 121).
$9,000,000 Misc. Senate Expenses (pg. 134).
$100,000,000 to essential air carriers (pg. 162.)
Additional funding through the “Take Responsibility for Workers and Families Act.” (pg. 164).
$10 Billion towards airport programs, including funding for the Airlines Recycle and Save Program (pg. 163). And the Federal Aviation Administration for administrative costs (pg. 165).
$492 Million to National Railroad Passenger Corporation – Amtrak (pg. 167). And $526 Million grants to Amtrak to remain available if needed through 2021 — (pg. 168).
$25 Billion for Transit Infrastructure (pg. 169).
$3,000,000 Maritime Administration (pg. 172).
$5,000,000 Salaries and Expensive Office of the Inspector General (pg. 172).
$2,500,000 Public and Indian Housing (pg. 175).
$5,000,000 Community Planning and Development (pg. 175).
$2,500,000 Office of Housing.
Apparently Congress would have you believe thousands more would die from Coronavirus without these programs to protect you from a mild** disease.
* Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act — Public Law No: 116-136
** Up to 8.2% die every year of those who are hospitalized in the U.S. for normal seasonal flu — even though many are vaccinated. Yet COVID-19 has killed only 5.7% and this amount is inflated for five reasons. 1. nobody is immune or vaccinated, 2. There is up to 80% false positives in some tests, 3. People who show up to the hospital with several co-morbid conditions that are about to kill them are counted as COVID-19 deaths regardless of what killed them, according to Dr. Birx. (Source: Dr. Birx, https://youtu.be/cLcSOUrvl48). 4. New York has BY FAR the highest Coronavirus deaths and they spread it worldwide according to a NYT Article — this happened after Gov. Cuomo forced nursing homes to accept Coronavirus patients. 5. Ventilators are counter productive and kill many. Respiratory Distress Syndrome is not indicated in COVID-19 patients — The respiratory muscles remain active. It is Oxygen deprivation that kills them.
New York Times:
New York ” became the primary source of new infections in the United States”
Is now the last chance to secure the blessings of liberty? Is resistance futile because you have been assimilated? How can it be constitutional to hold innocent people under house arrest? Join me as we ponder these questions.
Before you decide to stand up to the police state you should prepare to give an answer to the constitutionality issues.
Did your State impair the obligation of contracts?
Did your State Congress grant legislative powers to the Governor?
Do your Governor’s executive orders apply only to his/her employees?
Is the U.S. Constitution the Supreme Law of the land, and judges in every state shall be bound thereby?
Is every inhabitant in your State guaranteed a republic form of government?
Did you State prohibit the free exercise of religion?
Governments are instituted among men to secure the blessings of liberty. They also have the right (as does anyone else1) to prevent deaths by interfering in private affairs. Just as you have the right to enter a burning home without permission, or enter a home when someone is screaming for help.
There is no conflict between these two government duties. Government can both secure the blessings of liberty and protect rights.2 They can do both even during a crisis. They can do this the way it was always done. With quarantine zones, imposed in dense municipalities, to confine the disease.
They could also do this with quarantine zones around the most vulnerable. Stanford University’s Hoover Institute published an article explaining that shutting down the economy is not necessary. All we need to do is protect the most vulnerable. Link: https://www.hoover.org/research/playing-politics-coronavirus
This authority is called by various names like “police power”, “compelling state interest”, “overriding governmental interest”, “exigent circumstances”, “clear and present danger doctrine”. Government has a legitimate function that can trump your right to liberty. They can protect an innocent person from grave and immediate danger.
The ruse that you are a danger to someone, without evidence, does not justify loss of liberty.
According to the Supreme Court, “… freedoms of speech and of press, of assembly, and of worship may not be infringed on such slender grounds. They are susceptible of restriction only to prevent grave and immediate danger to interests which the state may lawfully protect” (This phrase was used in many Supreme Court decisions to protect your rights. Carrol v. Princess Anne 393 U.S. 175, Thomas v. Collins 323 U.S. 516, West Virginia v. Barnette 319 U.S. 624, in re Brown 9 Cal.3d 612, West’s Constitutional law, key 84, 90, 91 — etc.)
The 1905 United States Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts 197 US 11, concerned an emergency smallpox epidemic where people were dying, and quarantine zones were enforced in Boston. Mr. Jacobson, who had previously been injured by a childhood vaccination, and who raised no religious objections, raised ONLY the Constitutional question of equal protection, and who did not ask for a hearing, was given the option paying the $5 fine (a tax, if you want to use the Obamacare comparison) to remain unvaccinated inside the emergency quarantine zone. The $5 fine applied to anyone over the age of 21. Mr. Jacobson argued that he was denied equal protection because children were exempted from the fine. The Supreme Court determined “this cannot be deemed a denial of the equal protection of the laws to adults; for the statute is applicable equally to all in like condition, and there are obviously reasons why regulations may be appropriate for adults which could not be safely applied to persons of tender years.”
That’s right! The Supreme Court decision that States rely upon as their only authority to force vaccines on children, actually says vaccines are NOT for children. They also ruled that during a smallpox outbreak children would be kept out of public schools until vaccinated.
A law textbook, Cooley’s Constitutional Limitations, 8th Edition, page 1229 quotes this very same Supreme Court Jacobson quarantine decision as proof of the opposite of what your government now says. It concludes:
“The police power is not supreme and is not unlimited. It is subject to the limitations imposed by the Federal Constitution upon every power of government. It will not be suffered to invade or impair the fundamental liberties of the citizen”
That’s right: “fundamental liberties” cannot be impaired by quarantine laws. Why do we find our fundamental liberties eliminated — from government overreach to a mild disease? Yes; it is a mild disease. Smallpox killed 30% of those who contracted it. Yet COVID-19 only kills 5% of those who are sick enough to be hospitalized, most of which have at least two co-morbid underlying conditions. And many infected people never had any symptoms at all.
WHAT IS LIBERTY?
Let’s examine some of the “fundamental liberties” that cannot be impaired by police powers during a quarantine.
Law Textbook Definition of Liberty
Back when we had a Constitutional system of government, everyone knew we could get out of our house and exercise “the fundamental laws of our being”.
Supreme Court’s definition of Liberty.
The US Supreme Court waited for a homeschool case to give us their partial definition of Liberty. In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, 399:
The term Liberty “… denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint, but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, to establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his/her own conscience… the established doctrine is that this liberty may not be interfered with under the guise of protecting public interest, by legislative action which is arbitrary or without reasonable relation to some purpose within the competency of the state to effect.”
FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTIES DURING IMMINENT DANGER
Can it be constitutional to hold an innocent person under house arrest? I don’t know how the courts will rule, but you may want to know the foundations of liberty.
When the republic is in extreme danger of extinction, the law allows a magistrate absolute authority. This law existed in ancient Rome.
Blackstone’s Commentary on the Laws was the 1765 preeminent law textbook used when the United States was created. In the introduction to unalienable rights it says:
“…to imprison suspected persons without giving any reason for so doing; as the senate of Rome was wont to have recourse to a dictator, a magistrate of absolute authority, when they judged the republic in any imminent danger. The decree of the senate, which usually preceded the nomination of this magistrate, “dent operam consules, ne quid respublica detrimenti capiat,” was called the senatus consultum ultimae necessitatis. In like manner, this experiment ought only to be tried in cases of extreme emergency; and in these the nation parts with it’s liberty for a while, in order to preserve it for ever.
The confinement of the person, in any wise, is an imprisonment. So that the keeping a man against his will in a private house, putting him in the stocks, arresting or forcibly detaining him in the street, is an imprisonment. And the law so much discourages unlawful confinement, that if a man is under duress of imprisonment, which we before explained to mean a compulsion by an illegal restraint of liberty, until he seals a bond or the like; he may allege this duress, and avoid the extorted bond. But if a man be lawfully imprisoned, and either to procure his discharge, or any other fair account, seals a bond or a deed, this is not by duress of imprisonment, and he is not at liberty to avoid it. To make imprisonment lawful, it must either be by process from the courts of judicature, or by warrant from some legal officer having authority to commit to prison; which warrant must be in writing, under the hand and seal of the magistrate, and express the causes of the commitment, in order to be examined into (if necessary) upon a habeas corpus. 22 If there be no cause expressed, the jailer is not bound to detain the prisoner. For the law judges in this respect, saith sir Edward Coke, like Festus the Roman governor; that it is unreasonable to send a prisoner, and not to signify withal the crimes alleged against him.”
22. General warrants, commanding the seizure of any persons not named, or whose offence is not particularly described, . . .
THE LAWS OF NATURE
The first sentence of the Declaration of Independence says that the laws of nature entitles the United States to exist. This very same laws of nature tells us:
Legibus sumptis desinentibus, lege naturae utendum est.
When laws of the state fail, we must resort to the laws of nature.
Also see John Locke’s 1690 Second Treatise of Government paragraphs 135, 149, 171, 209.
No, not virus remedies. Legal remedies.
Deprivation of liberty under the color of law is a CRIME, at least for 14th Amendment citizens.
“… And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?”
— Thomas Jefferson on November 13, 1787 letter to future Congressman William S. Smith
“Let your motto be resistance! Resistance! No oppressed people have ever secured their liberty without resistance.”
– Abolitionist Henry Highland Garnet
You know James Otis for his slogan “Taxation without representation is tyranny”. He wrote The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved in 1764:
“But if every prince since Nimrod had been a tyrant, it would not prove a right to tyranize. There can be no prescription old enough to supersede the law of nature, and the grant of God almighty; who has given to all men a natural right to be free, and they have it ordinarily in their power to make themselves so, if they please.”
Thomas Jefferson’s inscription on his ring:
“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.”
US Supreme Court, Laird v. Tatum, 408 US 1, page 28:
“This case involves a cancer in our body politic. It is a measure of the disease which afflicts us. … Those who already walk submissively will say there is no cause for alarm. But submissiveness is not our heritage. The First Amendment was designed to allow rebellion to remain as our heritage. The Constitution was designed to keep the government off the backs of the people. … The Bill of Rights was designed to keep agents of government and official eavesdroppers away from assemblies of people. The aim was to allow men to be free and independent and to assert their rights against government. … When an intelligence officer looks over every nonconformist’s shoulder… the America once extolled as the voice of liberty heard around the world no longer is cast in the image which Jefferson and Madison designed, but more in the Russian image …”
But we now find out that it is a crime to peacefully assemble to petition government for redress of grievance. In a fictional place that can again become the land of the free.
— — — —
1. Law of necessity is a maxim of law: Illud quod alias licitum non est, necessitas facit licitum, et necessitas privilegium quod jure privatur. That which is not otherwise lawful, necessity makes lawful; and necessity brings in as a privilege what is denied by right.
2. After all, Ben Franklin once wrote that “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” — Benjamin Franklin, November 11, 1755; Reply to the Governor. This is inscribed on a plaque in the stairwell of the Statute of Liberty.
— — — —
– – – – –
Steven D. Miller is a freelance copywriter producing informative blog posts, white papers, eBooks and high-density documentaries. He is available on a limited basis to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free. Contact him at Steven.Miller@LibertyContentWriter.com
I recommend the video “Current testing procedures for COVID-19.” Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xr8Dy5mnYx8
The video explains why there are 80% false positives for the COVID-19 tests. And also explains the exaggerated panic from this ordinary virus.
Up to 8.2% die every year of those who are hospitalized in the U.S. for normal seasonal flu — even though many are vaccinated. And not one peep from the fake news industry. Yet COVID-19 has killed only 5.7% — early reports had it at only 2.5%. The newer rate is inflated for five reasons. 1. nobody is immune or vaccinated, 2. There are up to 80% false positives in some tests, 3. People who show up to the hospital with several co-morbid conditions that are about to kill them are counted as COVID-19 deaths regardless of what killed them, according to Dr. Birx. (Source: Dr. Birx, https://youtu.be/cLcSOUrvl48). 4. New York has BY FAR the highest Coronavirus deaths and they spread it worldwide according to a NYT Article — this happened after Gov. Cuomo forced nursing homes to accept Coronavirus patients. 5. Ventilators are counter productive and kill many, according to NYC Dr. Cameron Kyle Sidell. Respiratory Distress Syndrome is not indicated in COVID-19 patients — The respiratory muscles remain active and vibrant. It is Oxygen deprivation that kills them.
Fake news fails to tell you that
More elderly die from falls in the home than the flu.
And one-fifth of Americans will die from obesity, but the fake news industry discourages fat-shaming.
U.S. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC) FLU DATA:
The CDC likes to hide flu data. I am trying to find out how mild the COVID-19 virus is compared to the regular seasonal flu. By the way, the U.S. flu season was over on April first.
According to CDC:
The death rate for Influenza and pneumonia: 55,672 (this is from 2017, that is the latest data available). – Source: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm
According to CDC: The 2019-2020 flu season up to March 28th the CDC estimate is 24,000 to 63,000 flu deaths. This is quite a wide range for an organization that people rely on for accurate COVID-19 stats. – Source: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/preliminary-in-season-estimates.htm
According to CDC, for the last decade:
The estimated Range of Annual Burden of Flu in the U.S. for the last decade — estimated that influenza has resulted in between 9.3 million – 49.0 million illnesses, between 140,000 – 960,000 hospitalizations and between 12,000 – 79,000 deaths annually since 2010. — Source: www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/burden.htm
Recent COVID-19 stats:
According to CDC as of 4/7/2020,
link: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html Total COVID-19 cases: 374,329 Total COVID-19 deaths: 12,064
It seems to me that 12,064 deaths is a small fraction of normal seasonal deaths reported by the CDC, above. Especially when you consider the 80% false positives, and the confusion over what is actually reported.
It seems to me that 12,064 deaths is still less than the 2009-2010 Swine flu (H1N1 virus) during the Obama presidency. The H1N1 outbreak killed 12,469 Americans. And not one peep came out of the fake news media about manufacturing hysteria, destroying the economy or imposing a worldwide police state. And by the way, Obama waited for 1,000 American deaths before declaring an emergency. Whereas Trump stopped travel from China 10 days before the first American died (in Wuhan, China), which was a month before the first COVID-19 death in the U.S.
It seems to me that 12,064 deaths is about a third of the annual U.S. deaths (36,338 in 2017) from falls in the home. Falls are the #1 cause of death of the elderly according to the National Safety Council. Yet not one peep came from the fake news industry about imposing a police state or shutting down the economy to prevent these deaths.
Not only is the PCR testing done with a flawed standard that produces 80% false positives, now we find out that ANY Coronavirus is often categorized as COVID-19 in the reporting statistics.
Government Is Counting Death of Anyone with Coronavirus as a COVID-19 Death, Regardless of what co-morbid condition killed them
— source: Dr. Birx, https://youtu.be/cLcSOUrvl48
This false fear of a high death rate prompts people to go to the hospital for any flu like symptoms and when the doctors diagnose infectious flu they fill up the intensive care rooms to keep it from spreading.
In addition, people fear being turned-in to authorities, which has happened, so they think it is better to turn themselves in — again clogging up the hospitals.
SO, WHAT IS BEHIND THE MASS HYSTERIA?
The World Health Organization owns the diagnostic codes that are used in the United States. Every reporting system that uses them must pay a fee to use them.
Just take a look at all the confusion. This only increases the hysteria over what is actually reported as COVID-19 in the fake news. As you can see, just about any Coronavirus can end up as newsworthy. AND NOTICE THAT THE CDC ADDED THE W.H.O. CODE ONLY AFTER THE FLU SEASON WAS OVER.
There is no specific code for COVID-19 in the U.S. at this time, but one is coming soon. The World Health Organization (WHO) has already added code U07.1 (2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease) to the international ICD-10, and the CDC recently announced(www.cdc.gov) that the same code would be added to the U.S. ICD-10-CM list effective April 1. Starting on that day, U07.1 should be used to report a patient who has tested positive for COVID-19.
Until then, the CDC has published the following interim guidance on coding for this condition: For a diagnosis of COVID-19, report the code for the patient condition that is related to the COVID-19 (e.g., J12.89, “Other viral pneumonia”) and B97.29, “Other coronavirus as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere.”
Diagnostic code “87635 Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Coronavirus disease [COVID-19], amplified probe technique”
Question: Should CPT code 87635, a HCPCS Level II code, or both be reported if the test for COVID-19 is performed?
Answer: The appropriate code to be reported is dependent upon the payer to which the claim is being submitted. If the claim is submitted to a payer that requires CPT codes, then code 87635 should be reported. Conversely, if the payer requires use of the HCPCS Level II code, the HCPCS Level II code should be reported. CPT and HCPCS codes should not both be reported on the same claim.
So, now you know why there is so much confusion over what is reported as COVID-19. And why it is easy to count someone twice.
Was it a manufactured virus?
Forbes wants to debunk the rumors about a HIV virus strand in the COVID-19 virus. (link) But the article did not rebut the rumor that it was manufactured.
The U.S. Department of Justice published a news brief that it arrested a Harvard Professor who is also a “strategic scientist” at the Wuhan University working under a DoD grant. He was the Chair of the Chemical Biology Department at Harvard, and specialized in the area of nanoscience.
The head of the World Health Organization is a radical communist, and a former member of a violent terrorist organization.
According to the BBC, link: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-51720184, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director general of the WHO, started his career with membership in the Tigray People’s Liberation Front. The Department of Homeland Security has this to say about TPLF:
“The TPLF qualifies as a Tier III terrorist organization… on the basis of its violent activities before it became part of the ruling coalition and the government of Ethiopia in May 1991,” according to the Department of Homeland Security.
— Link: https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Laws/TRIG/2014_Implementation_of_New_Discretionary_Exemption_for_Activities_or_Associations_Relating_to_TPLF.pdf
Beware: Dr. Fauci’s questionable past.
Dr. Fauci gave a $3.7 Million Obama grant to the Wuhan lab. Link: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/27/anthony-fauci-should-explain-37-million-wuhan-labo/
Dr. Fauci is not your friend. Dr. Fauci is Hillary’s Doctor friend according to documents acquired by WikiLeaks. https://newspunch.com/wikileaks-dr-fauci-sent-series-love-letters-hillary-clinton/
Dr. Judy Mikovits exposes the extent to which Dr. Fauci will go to suppress his critics.
Video explaining the plan: https://youtu.be/P_RiO8yGZPA Download the paper directly from the Rockefeller Foundation “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. This May 2010 white paper examines possible future scenarios to take advantage of pandemics. Start with the chapter Lock Step. Search for “pandemic”.
They always announce their intentions.
Page 2: Acknowledgements
“We extend our deep appreciation and thanks to the Director-General of the World Health Organization and to the President, World Bank Group for having co-convened the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB).”
Page 39: Progress indicator(s) by September 2020
“• The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two systemwide training and simulation exercises, including one covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.”
Is the second one also going to be a lethal respiratory pathogen?
And now we have the latest Rockefeller Foundation plan to reopen workplaces and society. With drastic military control of the population.
Sponsored by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, with at least 45 cosponsors, all Democrats. It appropriates $100 Billion, with a B, just for 2020 alone.
TRACE empowers the government to go door-to-door for testing, contact tracing (forced disclosure of associates) and Enforced quarantine of Americans, supposedly for “the greater good. Seems to me that these fascists are building a massive tyranny (Mark of the Beast?) system.
It doesn’t specifically say so but $100B will allow them to enforce quarantine laws until you get vaccinated (with undisclosed components such as nano-technology chips) AND get a digital proof of immunity that Bill Gates mentioned. $100 Billion is over $1,500 for every U.S. household just for 2020. This can buy a lot of “Enforcement”.
House Resolution 6666 of 116th Congress, May 1, 2020, is known as “COVID–19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act”.
“authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.”
SEC. 2. COVID–19 TESTING AND CONTACT TRACING USING MOBILE HEALTH UNITS.
(a) In General.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, may award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, to trace and monitor the contacts of infected individuals, and to support the quarantine of such contacts, through—
(1) mobile health units; and
(2) as necessary, testing individuals and providing individuals with services related to testing and quarantine at their residences.
Link to bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6666
DISRUPTION BY DESIGN
I recommend this excellent video exposing the extensive plans developed by the World Economic Forum for their global domination. The entire structure to control governments, medical communities, economies, politicians, and critics. IT IS ALL IN PLACE. — THE ENTIRE PLAN FOR WORLD DOMINATION.
Celeste is a former FEMA worker who did not want to participate in your global-government genocide. Using their own index of programs, she explains the complete program objectives developed by the World Economic Forum. She also tries to tie the recent history to End Time Biblical prophecy.
The Plague of Corruption
This book is only available in Kindle format at this time.
THE HIDDEN OBJECTIVE IS TO IMPOSE A ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT.
The Globalists that want a one-world government must first destroy all existing governments. They will destroy every government economy. They will form police -states and Martial Law.
The world is in turmoil.
Civil unrest is being provoked by deep-state infiltratorswho are controlling all levels of all governments.
Police State is already here, while Martial Law is brewing worldwide.
Governments are being forced into massive welfare schemes where they must borrow beyond their capacity to repay. They will all go bankrupt when they default on a Treasury bond payment. Central Banks will then refuse to buy more Treasury bonds. Government overspending stops. When there is no new debt-based currency the economy as we know it will collapse. Banks and ATMs will shut down. Welfare checks will stop. Civil Unrest will follow.
People will then demand the only option presented to them: a communist one-world government.
If you were not prepared for the fake pandemic, how prepared are you to avoid both the Martial Law in front of you and the Civil Unrest approaching from the rear?
What comes next is not going to be life as we know it.
In addition to the holding camps for the looters and fugitives, and FEMA camps for the displaced (malnourished, homeless, cashless paupers and vagabonds) caused by the economy collapse. I predict that there will eventually be forced labor camps.
In U.S. law, an absconding debtor can be imprisoned. The moment you cannot pay your mortgage or rent, you are an absconding debtor.
The Two Trillion dollar bailout is too much for us to pay. It is all borrowed. After the government defaults on a Treasury bond payment, the government is bankrupt. The bankruptcy receivership will force a massive bail-in of all bank accounts and pension funds.
Then they come after you. The U.S. is the world’s greatest debtor. The creditors will come after their collateral. YOU are the collateral. I would not be surprised that forced labor camps are in our future. Go to USdebtClock.org and find out what your fair share is of the National Debt (and don’t forget the unfunded liabilities on the bottom line). By the way, China is the world’s greatest creditor.
Either pay up, or be welcomed into your Novus Ordo Seclorum, secular new world order.
You may also be interested in
How COVID-19 will seize your rights and destroy our economy
Bill Gates TED Talk: “So eventually there will be this digital immunity proof that will help facilitate the global reopening up”. This sentence was edited out of the YouTube video.
(by the way, he is running for U.S. Senate in Mass.)
“SARS was a pneumonia-like illness that killed about 1 in every 10 people struck, far higher than the estimated 1-in-50 mortality rate for COVID-19 infections. “There was enormous panic,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law.”
Here is an article that compares COVID-19 to past pandemics: https://www.news4jax.com/health/2020/03/29/100000-us-deaths-from-covid-19-how-does-that-compare-to-sars-swine-flu-and-other-pandemics/
Steven D. Miller is a freelance copywriter producing informative blog posts, white papers, eBooks, high-density documentaries and copywriting emails. He is available on a limited basis to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free. Contact him at Steven.Miller@LibertyContentWriter.com
I’ve been digging through the CDC.gov bowels to get to the guts of the data, but they are not easy to find. Here is the death rate from normal flu:
Estimated Range of Annual Burden of Flu in the U.S. since 2010. CDC estimates that influenza has resulted in between 9.3 million – 49.0 million illnesses, between 140,000 – 960,000 hospitalizations and between 12,000 – 79,000 deaths annually since 2010.
There were 79,000 deaths per year from ordinary seasonal flu and none of the fake news media yells “virus” in a crowded city.
79,000 divided by 365 days per year (as if it were not seasonal) is 216 per day.
If the news media didn’t panic for 216 deaths per day (average) from all flu strains, then why should we pay attention to a few deaths of people who were already at death’s door — with three or more preexisting co-morbid conditions?
Normal deaths from seasonal flu in the United States since 2010:
79,000 deaths from 960,000 hospitalizations is 8.2% deaths — the case fatality rate for seasonal flu.
79,000 deaths from a maximum of 49 million who might have had flu like symptoms (most do not end up in hospitals) is 0.16% deaths. — the Infection fatality rate.
According to the CDC, quoted above, up to 8.2% die every year of those who are hospitalized in the U.S. for normal seasonal flu — even though many are vaccinated.
Yet COVID-19 has killed only 5.7% of its cases, with nobody immune. Even with all the false positives. Even if co-morbid conditions killed them, these are being counted as COVID-19 deaths (Source: Dr. Birx, https://youtu.be/cLcSOUrvl48).
Can the PCR test determine who is infected?
No. There is no proof.
The PCR test replicates a virus’ RNA so that the “culture” can be tested.
Someone who is actually infected will have millions of replicating COVID-19 virus that their immune system cannot handle.
A nasal swab PCR test will replicate the virus RNA strand, but it cannot tell how many were on the swab, or if the person is infected beyond their immune response. Or if the person is immune but carrying the virus.
Many people stranded on quarantined cruise ships tested positive and yet have no symptoms. This is to be expected. The vast majority of carriers had no symptoms. This is natural. It is how herd immunity is created.
“Congressional doctor expects 70M to 150M people in U.S. will contract coronavirus…”
— NBC NEWS, March 11, 2020
“Coronavirus burial pits so vast they’re visible from space…”
— THE WASHINGTON POST, March 12, 2020
“The coronavirus may be deadlier than the 1918 flu…”
— CNBC, March 26, 2020
Pandemonium is created by the fake news industry. Here is more information:
The World Health Organization had COVID-19 test kits available BEFORE it came to America. But the fake news wants to blame Trump for a non-existent delay in test kits because our CDC ‘s decided to develop a more reliable test.
It is not at all clear what statistics the fake news media is spreading. Their early reports have a death rate of about 2.5%. Can we assume that it is the case fatality rate? Are the confirmed cases from hospitals or just from testing labs? (Note: Washington State was the hardest hit and their Department of Health website doh.wa.gov states that testing labs report confirmed cases, even if their are no symptoms and no health care case). Can we assume that it is confirmed cases and not just presumptive-positive cases? Can we assume that confirmed (or presumptive) cases are actual infections, when people on quarantined ships test positive but have no symptoms?
Here are some other interesting facts:
NO deaths of those aged 9 or younger. Not even in Wuhan China. And 0.2% of cases are those aged 10-39. But in the U.S. all deaths of people who test positive are reported as COVID-19 deaths regardless of what thy died from. So in the U.S. a girl aged 6 who died from a rare form of meningitis is listed as a COVID-19 death.
Wuhan China has a very high pollution where most people already have respiratory problems, and they have a malnourished populous.
The World Health Organization test kits have many false positives. People who test presumptive-positive must be retested to be confirmed positive.
Obamacare was allowed by the Supreme Court ONLY as a tax.
Government health care is unconstitutional (except for military personnel, prisoners and government wards, etc).
President Franklin Pierce in 1854 vetoed our nation’s first health care bill — a bill to help the mentally ill. His veto said
“I cannot find any authority in the Constitution for public charity…. [this] would be contrary to the letter and the spirit of the Constitution and subversive to the whole theory upon which the Union of these States is founded.”
Leftist History is repeating itself:
Bill Clinton’s Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders made statements that old people will die anyway while our vibrant young people are dying from AIDS.
Obama’s Chief of Staff during the H1N1 virus outbreak, Rahm Emanuel, is known for his quote “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”
And Obama kept repeating that Obamacare would cure a “health care crisis”.
And history shows that government fabricated crisis are fake.
My essay on Child Vaccinations. discusses the Supreme Court quarantine case from 1905. The Supreme Court allowed a $5 fine for those who remained in a quarantine area without being vaccinated.
My essay on socialized medicine: http://notfooledbygovernment.com/socialized-medicine/
The 1939 World’s Fair Westinghouse pavilion had a show “The bugaboo of Bugville” to promote their household ventilation UltraViolet light that kills microbes. They promoted it as the cure to any pandemic.
Ozone fumigation will kill microbes. If you want information on Ozone generator hazards, contact me.
If you need a guest blog or content writer, I am available.
When are law enforcement justified in shooting a fleeing suspect?
Steven Miller Answered August 9, 2018
Hardly ever. The person doing the shooting must be able to articulate an objectively reasonable belief, NOT JUST a subjectively reasonable belief, that the state’s self-defense criteria have been met.
Every government officer has a duty to secure your blessings of liberty. This includes your right to keep and bear arms. A non-shooter who is fleeing, is not a threat. Open-carry is a right just like any other Constitutionally guaranteed right. The fleeing non-shooter’s rights are “susceptible to restriction only to prevent grave and immediate injury to interests the state may lawfully protect.”
If everyone were to think like a bully, then we could say that an agitated person with a gun in a holster is an imminent threat to everyone else. It doesn’t matter who he works for.
US Supreme Court’s John Elk v. US, 177 US 529: “… where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. … the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
Housh v. Illinois, 75 Ill 491: “An arrest without warrant … or that fails to allege a crime is without jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. If the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.”
West Virginia v. Gum, 69 SE 463: “What rights then has a citizen in resisting an unlawful arrest? An arrest without warrant is a trespass, an unlawful assault upon the person, and how far one thus unlawfully assaulted may go in resistance is to be determined, as in other cases of assault…. And the authorities are uniform that where one is about to be unlawfully deprived of his liberty he may resist the aggressions of the offender, whether of a private citizen or a public officer, to the extent of taking the life of the assailant….”
Washington State v. Rousseau, 40 Wn.2d at 94: “It is the law that a person illegally arrested by an officer may resist that arrest, even to the extent of the taking of life, if his own life or any great bodily harm is threatened.”
As for already-arrested escapees who are unarmed — United States Supreme Court TENNESSEE v. GARNER(1985):
“Held: The Tennessee statute is unconstitutional insofar as it authorizes the use of deadly force against, as in this case, an apparently unarmed, nondangerous fleeing suspect; such force may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. Pp. 7-22. [471 U.S. 1, 2] ”
just like the other rights that the Supreme Court ruled are “susceptible to restriction only to prevent grave and immediate injury to interests the state may lawfully protect.”
Are you a slave to the IRS? Do you sign government documents under the penalty of perjury?
Do you Pay Caesar his tribute and Pharaoh his tale of bricks? (the terminology Tale of bricks is from Genesis 5:18).
In the Bible, slaves under Pharaoh had a 20% income tax during a time of national emergency (Genesis 47:23-26). The other 80% was their living allowance. How does this living allowance compare to your take-home allowance?
Now that we must confess our slave status to the IRS, I have a timely reminder of just how harsh the penalty of perjury really is. Why would someone who does not understand the tax laws sign a perjury oath signature on a government form?
Tucker’s Blackstone was an 1803 law textbook that updated a British law textbook Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England with commentaries on U.S. Constitutional law and the laws in Virginia.
Appendix Note H, The State of Slavery, compares Virginia slave laws, much improved after our independence, to those of the British laws that we separated from. We were slowly recognizing that criminal courts must treat everyone equal, even slaves. There were only three remaining laws that treated slaved more harshly. One was the perjury punishment.
… [for Burglary] But wherever the benefit of clergy is allowed to a slave, the court, besides burning him in the hand (the usual punishment inflicted on free persons) may inflict such further corporal punishment as they may think fit;1* this also seems to have been the law in the case of free negroes and mulattoes.
[for Perjury] By the act of 1723, c. 4, it was enacted, that when any negroe or mulattoe shall be found, upon due proof made, or pregnant circumstances, to have given false testimony, every such offender shall, without further trial, have his ears successively nailed to the pillory for the space of an hour, and then cut off, and moreover receive thirty-nine lashes on his bare back, or such other punishment as the court shall think proper, not extending to life or limb. This act, with the exception of the words pregnant circumstances, was re-enacted in 1792. The punishment of perjury, in a white person, is only a fine and imprisonment. …
1*. 1794, c. 103.
… [for livestock Theft] The punishment for the second and third offence, of this kind, is the same in the case of a free person, as of a slave, namely, by the pillory and loss of ears, for the second offence; the third is declared felony, to which clergy is, however, allowed. The preceding were, until lately, the only positive distinctions which remained between the punishment of a slave, and a white person, in those cases, where the latter is liable to a determinate corporal punishment.2*
2*. But herein the law is now altered by the act of 1796, c. 2, which does not extend to slaves.
And now we live in a nation where government can lie to us, but we cannot lie to them. Lawyers can lie to us in court, but we cannot lie. Government can photograph us, but if we photograph a rampaging plain-clothes officer in an unmarked car we can be sentenced to 16 years in prison.
NOT EVERYONE CAN SET THEMSELVES FREE. First Corinthians 7:21 (KJV): “Art thou called being a servant? care not for it: but if thou mayest be made free, use it rather.”
Those who have a debt to the master that they have chosen cannot be free until the debt is paid or they are kicked out. By helping set others free, you may someday be invited (delivered from bondage) into “… a land that floweth with milk and honey: I am the LORD your God, which have separated you” Leviticus 20:24
YOU DID NOT “PAY INTO” Social Security system– anymore than you paid into the income tax system or the Obamacare tax system.
Congress can spend your FICA tax money any way they want to. It is not invested for your benefit. The U.S. Supreme Court in Helvering v. Davis (1937), ruled that Social Security was not a contributory insurance program, saying on page 635:
“The proceeds of both taxes [the employee and employer taxes] are to be paid into the Treasury like other internal revenue taxes generally, and are not earmarked in any way.”
The United States Supreme Court in 1937 confirmed that Social Security is an exercise of the Constitutional taxing power to collect taxes. These are paid into the general fund of the United States Treasury. The Supreme Court also said that Congress could, in its future discretion, spend that money for whatever Congress then judged to be the general welfare of the country. Congress has no constitutional power to earmark or segregate certain kinds of tax proceeds for certain purposes, whether the purposes be farm-price supports, foreign aid or social security payments. When Mr. Nestor was deported after 43 years in the U.S. — The Supreme Court in Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, found that there is no contractual right to Social Security benefits, there is no accrued interest or accrued property right in old-age benefits, and congress can vote any “adjustment to ever-changing conditions which it demands and which Congress … had in mind when it expressly reserved the right to alter, amend or repeal any provision of the Act “. There is no entitlement to benefits. Never has been.
There is no division of funds in the treasury — nor has there ever been so from the beginning of Social Security. There is no separate fund created by payments of the Social Security tax.
The Federal Reserve Bank is NOT ABOUT keeping a control of the monetary money supply. By the time FDR was elected, the debt had skyrocketed during peacetime between 1930 to 1934. The Federal Reserve was tightening the money supply as the debt expanded. Something needed to be done to guarantee the payment of the interest on that debt. Federal citizens were to about to become collateral for the national debt.
Socialism is NOT security. SS is just like Obamacare which the Supreme Court determined was “valid as a tax” but not for benefits. Once you get a SSN you are liable for “Social Security and other taxes”. Welcome to your Novus Ordo Seclorum.
See my video on the dangers of socialism. I prove that nobody is required to have a SSN.
AS IF IT WAS INSURANCE
While the system of Federal Social Security was “sold as if it were insurance”– it was not. There is a great deception, a strong delusion, that social security taxes are payments of insurance premiums to obtain specified benefits at a specified time. There is no such right.
“The President wanted everybody covered for every contingency in life—’cradle to the grave,’ he called it—under the social insurance system… But the Government of the United States is not an insurance company and so it could be done.” Forward by Frances Perkins Sec of Labor 1933-45 The Development of the Social Security Act by Edwin E. Witte, page 7. On page 936 through page 946 of the Ways and Means hearings an originator of Social Security [Edwin Witte] stated that Social Security was “sold as if it were insurance” and that was a mistake and should not have been published as such. So it wasn’t until 1953 an originator admitted that it is not insurance as published in 1936.
“AS IF IT WERE insurance” IS NOT insurance.
As discussed in topic 3, below, in both Supreme Court Davis cases: The Social Security Tax Act, gives the government no obligation to pay benefits as “an earned right”. This is because the government has “no contractual obligation” to make any return payment, and it has carried the provision from the very beginning that, “The right to alter, amend, or repeal any provision of this act is hereby reserved to the Congress.” Therefore “Congress could continue to collect the so-called social security payroll taxes even though Congress discontinued all social security benefit payments.”
This is exactly what you should expect as the national and world economies continue their descent into devastating decline, debt and disaster. An essential purpose of the system introduced as social security was to add the labor of Americans to the collateral of the State so the people would become a surety of the already increasing debt that powers your central government. To believe that you have a right to get back specified benefits because you paid into Social Security is a delusion.
Once you get a Social Security Number to change your citizenship to a dual citizenship*, you cannot complain about the consequences. The Social Security Act Title VIII section 801 then requires you to pay Social Security AND OTHER TAXES.
This is also repeated word-for-word in Section 3101(a) of the Internal Revenue Code: “In addition to other taxes, there is hereby imposed on the income of every individual a tax equal to the following percentages of the wages…” Even though the Constitution still requires direct taxes to be apportioned among the several States.
* The Supreme Court in U.S. v Cruikshank case, 92 U.S. 542 at page 551:
“It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government.”