COVID-19 is a mild disease.

Here is CDC proof that COVID-19 is a mild disease.

The Washington Post says that Forty percent of people with coronavirus infections have no symptoms.
And we know that these asymptomatic carriers have ZERO chance of spreading the disease. See NIH study linked later in this article.

Senator Scott Jensen, MD interview explains away the high COVID-19 death statistics.

The COVID-19 overall hospitalization case fatality rate is 00.4% (according to last week’s CDC best estimate was published at — BUT they changed their report yesterday (7-10-2020) to eliminate their reporting of the case fatality data because, according to them, there are too many people testing positive who had no symptoms at all.

” estimates of case fatality ratios must account for numerous biases, including high numbers of asymptomatic cases, under-reporting of symptomatic cases, under-reporting of COVID-19 associated deaths, and the delay between case reporting and death reporting.  There is also likely regional variability in testing practices, reported incidence, and outcomes of interest, further confounding estimates. In this update, we have replaced the Symptomatic Case Fatality Ratio and the Symptomatic Case Hospitalization Ratio with the Infection Fatality Ratio (IFR), which takes into account both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases”.


My three comments:

  • this means they now have to guess how many cases were not reported. 
  • The wording “Case Fatality Ratio” is contrary to their standard for reporting seasonal flu statistics. (here). It now seems to switch between reported cases, hospitalizations and positive tests. And they are hiding the accuracy of the tests. I could not find out the percentage of false positives or even which test standard they are now using.
  • I also suspect that the death rate is getting too low to support the dem-panic.

By the way, the COVID-19 case fatality rate of 00.4% is much lower than the normal seasonal flu. And extremely lower than the Obama H1N1 non-pandemic of 2010-2011 which was 12.7% (source) — that did not get one peep from the fake news industry demanding we destroy the economy nor create millions of unemployed.

source:  Washington Post


There are many people who test positive that never develop any symptoms. The CDC says that “a significant portion of individuals with coronavirus lack symptoms” Source:

And a study published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on their government website link: says that there is ZERO chance of spreading the disease — out of the 455 individuals (hospital staff, family members, patients) in close contact for several days with positive tested carriers.

 It has become obvious to me that the deep-state infiltrators want to advance the next steps to their one-world government control of everyone. Forced vaccines, contact tracing. Mandatory ID* “proof of immunity”. There is now talk of $1,200 per day fines for refusing to cooperate with contact tracers. California has hired 20,000 contact tracers to track your every movement. And now there are rumors that their vaccines cause infertility and will genetically modify you.


but you already knew that.

U.S. healthcare kills their patients.

Perhaps we should pay attention. But not to those criminals who profit from vaccines.

The CDC promotes pharmaceutical company profits

CDC executives invest in the pharmaceutical companies. They have a conflict of interest. (the very definition of corruption) They profit from misery.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was issued U.S. Patent 7,776,521 in 2003 entitled “Coronavirus isolated from humans”. But they let the patent expire. So now anyone can develop a test kit.

The patent application (U.S. patent Application Number US46592703P) included:

  • A method of detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in a sample…; and,
  • A kit for detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in a sample…,

My search for the truth

I’m not a doctor, this is not medical advice. This is what I have seen:

  • Ventilators kill patients. CPAP with oxygen does not — even though the fake news says otherwise. 
  • Hydroxychloroquine with zinc cures people (except in the U.S. where the deep-state infiltrators developed studies that had massive overdoses to kill some test subjects — and the study didn’t even include zinc).
  • NY Post article stating that Hydroxychloroquine was rated the most effective treatment.
  • Fauci specialized in Virology. Fifteen years ago he was the director of the National Institutes of Health. He was aware of a study published in the August 22, 2005 Virology Journal entitled “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread” (link).
  • Even high doses of Vitamin C have helped. (1000 mg every 4 hours).
  • Inhaled corticosteroids ($200 of budesonide for the full course, in a $40 nebulizer) cure people. It is so safe that respiratory distressed babies are treated with it. See
  • A review of 41 studies published worldwide shows that Hydroxychloroquine is effective

A study from England published in Principia Scientific shows that all the alarmist presumptions that created the frantic demand for political intervention to slow the spread of COVID-19 were wrong. “It is very strongly implied that the interventions made no impact”.  That’s right.  Political forced lockdown DID NOTHING to flatten the curve.  Link:

Another study published by Lancet of 50 countries’ data for COVID-19 caseloads entitled “A country level analysis measuring the impact of government actions, country preparedness and socioeconomic factors on COVID-19 mortality and related health outcomes” determined:

“Rapid border closures, full lockdowns, and wide-spread testing were not associated with COVID-19 mortality per million people.”

“… in our analysis, full lockdowns and wide-spread COVID-19 testing were not associated with reductions in the number of critical cases or overall mortality”

* Mandatory ID? Now that everybody is accustomed to wearing a mask in order to buy or sell, the next step is proof of immunity. This will become what Bill Gates already stated “a digital proof of immunity”. Take heed that no man deceives you by any means.

– – – – –

You may also be interested in my posts at

– – – – –

Steven D. Miller is a freelance copywriter producing informative blog posts, white papers, eBooks and high-density documentaries. He is available on a limited basis to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free. Contact him at

Can a face mask stop a virus?

A face mask cannot possibly stop a coronavirus.

Established science published by the Journal of the American Medical Association proves that facemasks should NOT be worn by healthy individuals

A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine on April 1, 2020 states:

“wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.”

New England Journal of Medicine April 1, 2020 issue, Study entitled Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era link:

Then two months later the doctors who reported their study suddenly backtrack and write a letter to the editor published on June 3, 2020 at

“the intent of our article was to push for more masking, not less. It is apparent that many people with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic or presymptomatic yet highly contagious and that these people account for a substantial fraction of all transmissions.”

New England Journal of Medicine June 3, 2020 Letter to the Editor. link:

Why is their retraction contrary to the known science published by the National Institutes of Health that asymptomatic individuals have ZERO chance of spreading the disease?
study published by the National Institutes of Health on their government website link: says that there is ZERO chance of spreading the disease — out of the 455 individuals (hospital staff, family members, patients) in close contact for several days with positive tested carriers.

Size of the Coronavirus is too small to be filtered

According to a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine

“Electron micrographs of negative-stained 2019-nCoV particles were generally spherical with some pleomorphism. Diameter varied from about 60 to 140 nm. Virus particles had quite distinctive spikes, about 9 to 12 nm, and gave virions the appearance of a solar corona.”

A nanometer is one-thousandths of a micrometer (mm, also called micron). A virus diameter of 60 to 140 nanometers is a diameter of 0.060 to 0.140 micrometer.

Filter capability of N95 surgical mask

A N95 Surgical Mask is a mask manufactured to meet the NIOSH part 84 regulation N95. This government regulation requires the mask to filter out 95% of particles that are larger than 0.3 micrometers (0.300 microns). It will let through 5% of particles greater than 0.300 microns.

In other words, N95 mask will NOT filter out five side-by-side coronavirus, Nor 5% of larger particles that it is not required to filter out. Plus whatever gets in around the mask — and this is for government regulated surgical masks, not for cloth masks.  

Even Surgical Masks have never been effective

Here is the proof:

Face masks are dangerous

Here is an article from Sign of The Times:

Cloth masks are just for virtue signaling politicians.

You may also be interested in my post that proves Asymptomatic coronavirus carriers have ZERO risk of spreading the virus.

Here is a book about the unnecessary shutdown. The Price of Panic: How the Tyranny of Experts Turned a Pandemic into a Catastrophe by Jay W. Richards Ph.D., William M. Briggs Ph.D., et al.

Virus Bailout.

The $2.2 Trillion CARES Act* bailout is $10,200 per taxpayer.

The government could have given every taxpayer over $10,000 that it borrowed from your children’s future tax payments, but instead it will give only $1,200 to some people.

Where is the missing 96% of our tax dollars?​

Pelosi was House Majority leader during the Obama 2009 H1N1 virus outbreak. Obama’s Chief of Staff during the 2009 H1N1 virus outbreak, Rahm Emanuel, is known for his quote “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”

With the new Coronavirus opportunity, Pelosi wasted no time pushing her radical agenda. The Senate was able to remove the Pelosi wish list items for abortion funding, election day registration of illegals (needing only a signature to vote, without proof of citizenship), 50% reduction of emissions from planes, and many other wacko agendas that have nothing to do with the pandemic or the shutdown.

BUT look at what Pelosi was able to push through the Senate:
  • $300 Million for migrant and refugee assistance (pg. 147).
  • $10,000 per person for student loan bailout
    (to spit in the face of every student who worked hard to save up for tuition).
  • $100 Million to NASA,
  • $10,000,000,000 to the U.S. Postal Service
    ($10 Billion seems excessive to me, for delivery service that UPS and FedEx make a profit ).
  • $75,000,000 to the Endowment for the Arts
  • $75,000,000 for the Endowment for the Humanities
  • $17,200,000,000 for the Veterans Health Administration.
  • $30 Billion for the Department of Education Stabilization Fund.​
  • $200,000,000 to Safe Schools Emergency Response to Violence Program.
  • $300,000,000 to Public Broadcasting
  • $500,000,000 to museums and libraries
  • $338,000,000 to the Social Security Administration– for administrative costs only, not for helping people.
  • $25,000,000 cleaning supplies for the Capitol Building (on page 136).
    (For $25 Million in cleaning supplies, I can suggest what the Capitol Building needs to clean).
  • $7,500,000 to the Smithsonian for additional salaries.
  • $25,000,000 to the John F. Kennedy Center for Performing Arts. (even though they are shutdown)
  • $25,000,000 for necessary expenses for the House of Representatives.
  • $2.15 Billion upgrade to the IT department at the Department of Veteran Affairs.
    (be grateful it didn’t go to the IRS).
  • $324,000,000 for State Department Diplomatic Programs​.
  • $363,000,000 for the Agency for International Development.
  • $258,000,000 for International Disaster Assistance. (not for you)
  • $90,000,000 for the Peace Corp (pg. 148).
  • $4,036,000 to Howard University – (Kamala Harris’ alma mater – pg. 121).
  • $9,000,000 Misc. Senate Expenses (pg. 134).
  • $100,000,000 to essential air carriers (pg. 162.)​
  • Additional funding through the “Take Responsibility for Workers and Families Act.” (pg. 164).
  • $10 Billion towards airport programs, including funding for the Airlines Recycle and Save Program (pg. 163).  And the Federal Aviation Administration for administrative costs (pg. 165).
  • $492 Million to National Railroad Passenger Corporation – Amtrak (pg. 167). And $526 Million grants to Amtrak to remain available if needed through 2021 — (pg. 168).
  • $25 Billion  for Transit Infrastructure (pg. 169).
  • $3,000,000 Maritime Administration (pg. 172).
  • $5,000,000 Salaries and Expensive Office of the Inspector General (pg. 172).
  • $2,500,000 Public and Indian Housing (pg. 175).
  • $5,000,000 Community Planning and Development (pg. 175).
  • $2,500,000 Office of Housing.
Apparently Congress would have you believe thousands more would die from Coronavirus without these programs to protect you from a mild** disease.​
Here is a book about the unnecessary shutdown. The Price of Panic: How the Tyranny of Experts Turned a Pandemic into a Catastrophe by Jay W. Richards Ph.D., William M. Briggs Ph.D., et al.
* Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act — Public Law No: 116-136
**  Up to 8.2% die every year of those who are hospitalized in the U.S. for normal seasonal flu — even though many are vaccinated. Yet COVID-19 has killed only 5.7% and this amount is inflated for five reasons. 1. nobody is immune or vaccinated, 2. There is up to 80% false positives in some tests, 3. People who show up to the hospital with several co-morbid conditions that are about to kill them are counted as COVID-19 deaths regardless of what killed them, according to Dr. Birx.  (Source: Dr. Birx, 4. New York has BY FAR the highest Coronavirus deaths and they spread it worldwide according to a NYT Article  — this happened after Gov. Cuomo forced nursing homes to accept Coronavirus patients. 5. Ventilators are counter productive and kill many. Respiratory Distress Syndrome is not indicated in COVID-19 patients — The respiratory muscles remain active. It is Oxygen deprivation that kills them. 
New York Times:
New York ” became the primary source of new infections in the United States”

Quarantine Constitutionality?

Quarantine Constitutionality
by Steven D. Miller

Is now the last chance to secure the blessings of liberty? Is resistance futile because you have been assimilated? How can it be constitutional to hold innocent people under house arrest? Join me as we ponder these questions.

Before you decide to stand up to the police state you should prepare to give an answer to the constitutionality issues.

  • Did your State impair the obligation of contracts?
  • Did your State Congress grant legislative powers to the Governor?
  • Do your Governor’s executive orders apply only to his/her employees?
  • Is the U.S. Constitution the Supreme Law of the land, and judges in every state shall be bound thereby?
  • Is every inhabitant in your State guaranteed a republic form of government?
  • Did you State prohibit the free exercise of religion?

Governments are instituted among men to secure the blessings of liberty. They also have the right (as does anyone else1) to prevent deaths by interfering in private affairs. Just as you have the right to enter a burning home without permission, or enter a home when someone is screaming for help.

There is no conflict between these two government duties.  Government can both secure the blessings of liberty and protect rights.2 They can do both even during a crisis. They can do this the way it was always done. With quarantine zones, imposed in dense municipalities, to confine the disease.

Liberty Bell is inscribed with Leviticus 25:10
Leviticus 25:10 Proclaim Liberty Throughout the Land.

They could also do this with quarantine zones around the most vulnerable. Stanford University’s Hoover Institute published an article explaining that shutting down the economy is not necessary. All we need to do is protect the most vulnerable. Link:


This authority is called by various names like “police power”, “compelling state interest”, “overriding governmental interest”, “exigent circumstances”, “clear and present danger doctrine”.  Government has a legitimate function that can trump your right to liberty. They can protect an innocent person from grave and immediate danger.

The ruse that you are a danger to someone, without evidence, does not justify loss of liberty.

COV-2 filled exosomes budding from a lung tissue cell.

According to the Supreme Court, “… freedoms of speech and of press, of assembly, and of worship may not be infringed on such slender grounds. They are susceptible of restriction only to prevent grave and immediate danger to interests which the state may lawfully protect” (This phrase was used in many Supreme Court decisions to protect your rights. Carrol v. Princess Anne 393 U.S. 175, Thomas v. Collins 323 U.S. 516, West Virginia v. Barnette 319 U.S. 624, in re Brown 9 Cal.3d 612, West’s Constitutional law, key 84, 90, 91 — etc.)


The 1905 United States Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts 197 US 11, concerned an emergency smallpox epidemic where people were dying, and quarantine zones were enforced in Boston. Mr. Jacobson, who had previously been injured by a childhood vaccination, and who raised no religious objections, raised ONLY the Constitutional question of equal protection, and who did not ask for a hearing, was given the option paying the $5 fine (a tax, if you want to use the Obamacare comparison) to remain unvaccinated inside the emergency quarantine zone. The $5 fine applied to anyone over the age of 21. Mr. Jacobson argued that he was denied equal protection because children were exempted from the fine. The Supreme Court determined “this cannot be deemed a denial of the equal protection of the laws to adults; for the statute is applicable equally to all in like condition, and there are obviously reasons why regulations may be appropriate for adults which could not be safely applied to persons of tender years.”

That’s right! The Supreme Court decision that States rely upon as their only authority to force vaccines on children, actually says vaccines are NOT for children. They also ruled that during a smallpox outbreak children would be kept out of public schools until vaccinated.

A law textbook, Cooley’s Constitutional Limitations, 8th Edition, page 1229 quotes this very same Supreme Court Jacobson quarantine decision as proof of the opposite of what your government now says. It concludes:

“The police power is not supreme and is not unlimited. It is subject to the limitations imposed by the Federal Constitution upon every power of government. It will not be suffered to invade or impair the fundamental liberties of the citizen”

That’s right: “fundamental liberties” cannot be impaired by quarantine laws.  Why do we find our fundamental liberties eliminated — from government overreach to a mild disease?  Yes; it is a mild disease. Smallpox killed 30% of those who contracted it.  Yet COVID-19 only kills 5% of those who are sick enough to be hospitalized, most of which have at least two co-morbid underlying conditions.  And many infected people never had any symptoms at all.

Image: The Plague In Rome by Jules Elie Delaunay, painted in 1869


Let’s examine some of the “fundamental liberties” that cannot be impaired by police powers during a quarantine.

Law Textbook Definition of Liberty

Back when we had a Constitutional system of government, everyone knew we could get out of our house and exercise “the fundamental laws of our being”.

A Treatise of the Right to Personal Liberty, Second Edition, Book 1, Chapter 1, Section 1.
Rollin C. Hurd, 1876, W.C. Little Co., Albany, NY

Supreme Court’s definition of Liberty.

The US Supreme Court waited for a homeschool case to give us their partial definition of Liberty. In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, 399:

The term Liberty “… denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint, but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, to establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his/her own conscience… the established doctrine is that this liberty may not be interfered with under the guise of protecting public interest, by legislative action which is arbitrary or without reasonable relation to some purpose within the competency of the state to effect.”


Can it be constitutional to hold an innocent person under house arrest? I don’t know how the courts will rule, but you may want to know the foundations of liberty.

When the republic is in extreme danger of extinction, the law allows a magistrate absolute authority. This law existed in ancient Rome.

Blackstone’s Commentary on the Laws was the 1765 preeminent law textbook used when the United States was created. In the introduction to unalienable rights it says:

“…to imprison suspected persons without giving any reason for so doing; as the senate of Rome was wont to have recourse to a dictator, a magistrate of absolute authority, when they judged the republic in any imminent danger. The decree of the senate, which usually preceded the nomination of this magistrate, “dent operam consules, ne quid respublica detrimenti capiat,” was called the senatus consultum ultimae necessitatis. In like manner, this experiment ought only to be tried in cases of extreme emergency; and in these the nation parts with it’s liberty for a while, in order to preserve it for ever.

The confinement of the person, in any wise, is an imprisonment. So that the keeping a man against his will in a private house, putting him in the stocks, arresting or forcibly detaining him in the street, is an imprisonment. And the law so much discourages unlawful confinement, that if a man is under duress of imprisonment, which we before explained to mean a compulsion by an illegal restraint of liberty, until he seals a bond or the like; he may allege this duress, and avoid the extorted bond. But if a man be lawfully imprisoned, and either to procure his discharge, or any other fair account, seals a bond or a deed, this is not by duress of imprisonment, and he is not at liberty to avoid it. To make imprisonment lawful, it must either be by process from the courts of judicature, or by warrant from some legal officer having authority to commit to prison; which warrant must be in writing, under the hand and seal of the magistrate, and express the causes of the commitment, in order to be examined into (if necessary) upon a habeas corpus. 22 If there be no cause expressed, the jailer is not bound to detain the prisoner. For the law judges in this respect, saith sir Edward Coke, like Festus the Roman governor; that it is unreasonable to send a prisoner, and not to signify withal the crimes alleged against him.”
22. General warrants, commanding the seizure of any persons not named, or whose offence is not particularly described, . . .


The first sentence of the Declaration of Independence says that the laws of nature entitles the United States to exist. This very same laws of nature tells us:

Legibus sumptis desinentibus, lege naturae utendum est.
When laws of the state fail, we must resort to the laws of nature.

Also see John Locke’s 1690 Second Treatise of Government paragraphs 135, 149, 171, 209.


No, not virus remedies. Legal remedies.

Deprivation of liberty under the color of law is a CRIME,  at least for 14th Amendment citizens.

Courts award large compensatory damages for deprivation of liberty.  See my essay on How much is your liberty worth?

Insightful Quotes

“… And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?”
— Thomas Jefferson on November 13, 1787 letter to future Congressman William S. Smith

“Let your motto be resistance! Resistance! No oppressed people have ever secured their liberty without resistance.”
– Abolitionist Henry Highland Garnet

You know James Otis for his slogan “Taxation without representation is tyranny”.  He wrote The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved in 1764:

“But if every prince since Nimrod had been a tyrant, it would not prove a right to tyranize. There can be no prescription old enough to supersede the law of nature, and the grant of God almighty; who has given to all men a natural right to be free, and they have it ordinarily in their power to make themselves so, if they please.”

Thomas Jefferson’s inscription on his ring:
“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.”

US Supreme Court, Laird v. Tatum, 408 US 1, page 28:

“This case involves a cancer in our body politic. It is a measure of the disease which afflicts us. … Those who already walk submissively will say there is no cause for alarm. But submissiveness is not our heritage. The First Amendment was designed to allow rebellion to remain as our heritage. The Constitution was designed to keep the government off the backs of the people. … The Bill of Rights was designed to keep agents of government and official eavesdroppers away from assemblies of people. The aim was to allow men to be free and independent and to assert their rights against government. … When an intelligence officer looks over every nonconformist’s shoulder… the America once extolled as the voice of liberty heard around the world no longer is cast in the image which Jefferson and Madison designed, but more in the Russian image …”

But we now find out that it is a crime to peacefully assemble to petition government for redress of grievance. In a fictional place that can again become the land of the free.

— — — —

1. Law of necessity is a maxim of law: Illud quod alias licitum non est, necessitas facit licitum, et necessitas privilegium quod jure privatur. That which is not otherwise lawful, necessity makes lawful; and necessity brings in as a privilege what is denied by right.

2. After all, Ben Franklin once wrote that “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” — Benjamin Franklin, November 11, 1755; Reply to the Governor. This is inscribed on a plaque in the stairwell of the Statute of Liberty.

— — — —

– – – – –

Steven D. Miller is a freelance copywriter producing informative blog posts, white papers, eBooks and high-density documentaries. He is available on a limited basis to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free. Contact him at  

%d bloggers like this: