Uncategorized

The real American Revolution was the radical change in the views of the people in the years before the War for independence.

“The war? That was no part of the revolution. It was only an effect and consequence of it. The Revolution was in the Minds of the People, and this was effected, from 1760 to 1775, in the course of fifteen years before a drop of blood was drawn at Lexington.”
— John Adams letter to Thomas Jefferson, August 24, 1815

He went on to say:

“public opinion was enlightened and informed concerning the authority of Parliament over the Colonies”
— https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/99-02-02-6507

That’s right. The people have final authority over government. NOT the other way around.
After all, we the people are the jura summa imperii.

“The Revolution was in the Minds and Hearts of the People, and in the Union of the Colonies, both of which were Substantially effected before Hostilities commenced.”
— John Adams letter to Jedidiah Morse, November 29, 1815

“But what do We mean by the American Revolution? Do We mean the American War? The Revolution was effected before the War commenced. The Revolution was in the Minds and Hearts of the People. A Change in their Religious Sentiments of their Duties and Obligations. While the King, and all in Authority under him, were believed to govern, in Justice and Mercy according to the Laws and Constitutions derived to them from the God of Nature, and transmitted to them by their Ancestors— they thought themselves bound to pray for the King and Queen and all the Royal Family, and all the Authority under them, as Ministers ordained of God for their good. But when they Saw those Powers renouncing all the Principles of Authority, and bent up on the destruction of all the Securities of their Lives, Liberties and Properties, they thought it their Duty to pray for the Continental Congress and all the thirteen State Congresses, &c.”
— John Adams letter to Hezekiah Niles, February 13, 1818

The real American revolution was the change in the people’s opinions about tyrants. Not the war.

When will you take a stand?

At birth, are we state citizens or are we automatically U.S. citizens under the 14th Amendment?

Answer: No. Citizenship is political allegiance. We are all created equal with unalienable rights that governments are instituted among men to secure.

John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, which was the foundation for most of the Declaration of Independence, in his Chapter 6 “Paternal rights”, says that a child is not subject to legislated laws until he is old enough to make binding contracts. He said in paragraph 57: “for nobody can be under a law, which is not promulgated to him” and later in paragraph 73 when children become 21 years old they can choose which government to place themselves under, and, according to paragraph 62, this cannot happen until they have the recognized right to take binding oaths of allegiance.

At birth, you are subject to your father’s coverture. If the state finds out that you exist, they might consider you to be an inhabitant. After all, they count infants in the census. The received-law-of-the-land, in the Articles of Confederation, Article 4, says that inhabitants have the same rights as a citizen.

US Supreme Court in 1941 (6 years after the Social Security Act) Edwards v. California, 314 US 172, at the bottom of page 183 “birth within a state does not establish citizenship thereof.”
You have to apply for federal citizenship.
Kitchens v. Steel, 112 F.Supp 383: “A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government”

Notice the words of the 14th Amendment “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” — which is different than the 13th Amendment’s “subject to their jurisdiction” — plural states prior to the 14th, singular federal government in and after the 14th. It is a totally new kind of citizenship — created by and subject to the federal government. No longer subject to the states that created the federal government.

Also notice that the word “Citizen” is ALWAYS capitalized prior to the 14th Amendment, and always lower case thereafter.

The 14th Amendment is one of the Martial Law amendments.
Prior to the 13th Amendment there were three types of Martial Law (see Luther v. Borden, 1849), but the 13th added another Martial Law Rule with section 2 “Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”
This is legislative enforcement is required in 8 of the Amendments (13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 23, 24, 26)
They are enforced in LEGISLATIVE TRIBUNALS. (allowed by Article 1, section 8. DO NOT confuse these with judicial courts of Article 3.) AND JUDGES IN EVERY STATE SHALL BE BOUND THEREBY (Article 6, second paragraph) even if they are contrary to State Constitutions.

We are still under Martial Law Rule.

The 14th Amendment allowed freed slaves, and anyone else, to seek federal benefits. Back then it was the Freedmen’s Bureau. Now it is Social Security.

The Expatriation Act of 1868 was passed the day prior to the ratification of the 14th Amendment.
It allows federal welfare for anyone who becomes a citizen (lower case c citizen of the 14th Amendment).
The Expatriation Act says: “This claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed:…”
Once you expatriate from the [foreign State of the Union, to the federal government] by seeking federal benefits, your allegiance to the foreign State of the Union is “promptly and finally disavowed” This is why the U.S. is one of the two countries on the globe that taxes their citizens wherever they are located.

Furthermore, you can no longer have standing in any court to complain about how your slave status.

Don’t be fooled by any authority of benefactors.

Christ commanded his followers (Christians) to NOT have a top-down government of benefactors. Luke 22:25-26.

Once you take a government benefit, you become subject to your benefactor.[1][2]

The Expatriation Act of 1868 was passed into law the day before the 14th Amendment was ratified. It allowed anyone (such as freed slaves) to take federal benefits, and become “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”.[3]

Once you apply for a federal benefit under the 14th Amendment, you “promptly and finally disavowed” any State allegiance — according to the Expatriation Act.

Don’t say that you didn’t know. You were warned in Romans 11:9 (repeating Psalm 69:22) that welfare would be a snare to trap you.

Footnotes:

1. Blackstone’s Commentaries: “a state of dependence will inevitably oblige the inferior to take the will of him, on whom he depends, …”

2. Every Law Dictionary will tell you that Libertinum ingratum leges civiles in pristinam servitutem redigunt. “The civil laws reduce an ungrateful freeman to his original servitude”. Maybe you think this law does not apply to you. Maybe you think that you are not a slave. Think again.

3. You voluntarily entered the federal government when you signed a federal form. This made you “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”. (Quote from U.S. Supreme Court’s Elk v. Wilkins 112 U.S. 94). The Supreme Court continued. It explained the extent to which you must be subject – “not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to…”.

Also see God hated Esau

Beware of your Congressional Representatives who do not represent you.
They betray the trust you gave them. In the ultimate betrayal they sold you to foreigners.

Example: if you elect Bar Attornies to the legislature, they have allegiance to their foreign masters. The legislated laws cannot be copyrighted. The law books are published by lawyers, and are copyrighted. If your representative enacts a change to your state’s codified laws, instead of the statutes at large, he is committing mutiny against the trust you gave him.

Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, 1690:

“Sec. 22. THE natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on
earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to
have only the law of nature for his rule. The liberty of man, in society, is
to be under no other legislative power, but that established, by consent, in
the commonwealth; nor under the dominion of any will, or restraint of any
law, but what that legislative shall enact, according to the trust put in
it. Freedom then is not what Sir Robert Filmer tells us, Observations, A.
55. a liberty for every one to do what he lists, to live as he pleases, and
not to be tied by any laws: but freedom of men under government is, to have
a standing rule to live by, common to every one of that society, and made by
the legislative power erected in it; a liberty to follow my own will in all
things, where the rule prescribes not; and not to be subject to the
inconstant, uncertain, unknown, arbitrary will of another man: as freedom of
nature is, to be under no other restraint but the law of nature.”

“Sec. 141. Fourthly, The legislative cannot transfer the power of making laws
to any other hands: for it being but a delegated power from the people, they
who have it cannot pass it over to others. The people alone can appoint the
form of the common-wealth, which is by constituting the legislative, and
appointing in whose hands that shall be. And when the people have said, We
will submit to rules, and be governed by laws made by such men, and in such
forms, no body else can say other men shall make laws for them; nor can the
people be bound by any laws, but such as are enacted by those whom they have
chosen, and authorized to make laws for them. The power of the legislative,
being derived from the people by a positive voluntary grant and institution,
can be no other than what that positive grant conveyed, which being only to
make laws, and not to make legislators, the legislative can have no power to
transfer their authority of making laws, and place it in other hands.”

Even Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Law, Book 4, explains that that rights protect us from every known method of compulsion. [ link to an 1803 revision that includes American law http://constitution.org/1-Constitution/tb/tb2.htm ]

“The rights themselves, thus defined by these several statutes, consist in a number of private immunities, which will appear, from what has been premised, to be indeed no other, than either that residuum of natural liberty, which is not required by the laws of society to be sacrificed to public convenience; or else those civil privileges, which society hath engaged to provide, in lieu of the natural liberties so given up by individuals. These, therefore, were formerly, either by inheritance or purchase, the rights of all mankind; but, in most other countries of the world being now more or less debased and destroyed, they at present may be said to remain, in a peculiar and emphatical manner, the rights of the people of England. And these may be reduced to three principal or primary articles; the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right of private property: because, as there is no other known method of compulsion, or of abridging man’s natural free will, but by an infringement or diminution of one or other of these important rights, the preservation of these, inviolate, may justly be said to include the preservation of our civil immunities in their largest and most extensive sense. “

If government does not protect you from compulsion, perhaps you would want to find out why.

Biden’s “government” is NOT a government.

Real Government controls its officers. Biden (or his handlers) have no government authority to control those who do not swear an oath-of-office to faithfully uphold the Constitution.

The law (Title 5, U.S. Code, section 3331) requires elected or appointed officials to swear oaths to support, defend and bear true faith and allegiance* to the Constitution of United States. It requires a very specific oath.

Title 5, section 3332 requires a signed and notarized oath of office to be filed within 30 days.

U.S. Attorney Todd Calendar and his team at Project Proper Oath, found that NOT A SINGLE CABINET MEMBER has an oath of office that meets the requirements of law.

Without an oath, there is no government authority. There is no chain of command.

Janet Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury has no oath of office.
Lloyd Austin, Secretary of Defense, has no oath of office.
Merrick Garland, Attorney General, has no oath of office.
Antony Blinken, Secretary of State, has no oath of office.
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, has no oath of office.
Pete Buttigieg, Secretary of Transportation, has no oath of office.
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, has no oath of office.
Jack Smith, special investigator of J6 Capitol protestors, has no oath of office.
Matthew Graves, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, chief prosecutor of J6 protestors, has no oath of office.
Vice President Kamala Harris has no oath of office.

On January 10, 1963, there were 45 Communist goals published in the Congressional Record. Number 13 was to do away with loyalty oaths.

• There can be no insubordination unless there are subordinates.
• If there is no allegiance* there are no subordinates.
• Without a chain of command, there can be no crime of mutiny.

MU’TINY, noun [Latin muto, to change.]

“An insurrection of soldiers or seamen against the authority of their commanders; open resistance of officers or opposition to their authority.”
“acts of individuals, amounting to a resistance of the authority or lawful commands of officers, are declared to be mutiny ”

— Websters Dictionary

ALLEGIANCE 
noun
al·​le·​giance ə-ˈlē-jən(t)s
1
a
: the obligation of a feudal vassal to his liege lord
b(1)
: the fidelity owed by a subject or citizen to a sovereign or government
I pledge allegiance to my country.
(2)
: the obligation of an alien to the government under which the alien resides

2
: devotion or loyalty to a person, group, or cause

What are you going to do about it?