Should government spend money on the military or education?

Governments must spend money for Constitutional purposes such as military.
Education is NOT a function of Government. There is no authority to spend money for public education of children, with the exception of surrendered children, blind and deaf.

The Supreme Court keeps ruling over and over and over again that it is the parents responsibility to educate their children. Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, and there are dozens of cases on family privacy.

Communism is un-American. Public schools are the 10th plank of the Communist Manifesto. Communism cannot recognize individual rights. PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE EVIL. Back when America was a free country, people never thought public schools would exist in America. After all, our state Constitutions just do not authorize such a thing [although they may authorize schools for the blind and deaf, and universities that charge tuition]. Rights can only come with responsibilities, and no one would have a right to force others to pay for their children’s education. Even the U.S. Supreme Court in Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, concluded “it is the natural duty of the parent to give his children education suitable to their station in life…”
This is very similar to Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Law:

“The duty of parents for the maintenance of their [legitimate] children is a principle of natural law … The establishment of marriage in all civilized states is built on this natural obligation… The last duty of parents to their children is that of giving them an education suitable to their station in life … Yet the municipal laws constraining the parent to bestow a proper education upon his children made a wise provision for breeding up the rising generation… .”

That’s right! By institutionalizing “your” children, you have confessed that you are incapable of raising your own children. You lose your parental rights. The children become wards of the state. It is no wonder family courts are so sure that they have jurisdiction over the state’s children. Activist judges no longer fear that they will be charged with kidnapping, genocide, and depravation of liberty under color of law. For un-surrendered children, state protection would be severely limited to a compelling state interest.

Who would ever send their children to ungodly indoctrination factories to be transformed into mindless robots for the state? This sounds too much like a science fiction story of an alternate future that went horribly wrong.
For those parents who forfeit their rights to their own children, Hillary’s village will be waiting to raise them. (If it takes a village to perform a natural duty that everyone has, then how competent can these villagers be? )
Yes, there are state schools for the blind and forced schooling for children of parents who cannot care for themselves.

These forced education exceptions for surrendered children were never intended for the vast majority. It was not until 1900 New York that socialist public schools were forced on an unsuspecting public.
Here is proof that mandatory public education IS genocide.
The Genocide Treaty ratified by the Senate on February 19, 1986, 78 UNTS 277, defines genocide in its Article II as

“any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such: … (d) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) forcibly transferring children of the group to another group”

If you don’t realize that Christian children are forcibly transferred to another group for the purposes of Genocide then you don’t understand why public schools were established.

For more information read my essay at http://notfooledbygovernment.com…

Steven Miller · Originally Answered Dec 22, 2017

Leave a Reply