Officers are not trained to recognize the difference between pacifism, non-resistance, non-violence, non-cooperation, and conscientious objection. Peaceful protestors beware.
They only recognize force. In their eyes, their might makes right.
Actions speak louder than words. If you obey an unlawful order the legal doctrine of estopple then prohibits you in court from claiming your liberty was damaged. You volunteered.
Even cooperating with fingerprinting or mug shot waives your rights to redress grievance. You volunteered. Maxims of law regarding volunteers:
• “Volenti non fit injuria”
• “That to which a man consents cannot be considered an injury.”
• “He who consents to an act is not damaged by it.”
• “He who consents cannot receive an injury”
• “To him consenting no injury is done.”
Estopple is partially defined in Black’s Law Dictionary as:
“A man’s own act or acceptance stops or closes his mouth to allege or plead the truth”. (partial definition within a page long definition).
Estopple, according to the law dictionary:
–Arises when one is concluded and forbidden by law to speak against his own act or deed.
–An inconsistent position, attitude or course of conduct
–A bar or impediment which precludes allegation or denial of a certain fact or state of facts in consequence of previous allegation or denial or conduct or admission, or in consequence of a final adjudication of the matter in a court of law.
When an officer barks out an illegal order, your duty is to risk death to correct the officer. Peaceful protestors beware.
Second Timothy 2:23 “But avoid foolish and ignorant disputes, knowing that they generate strife.”
But Second Timothy 2 Verses 24 and 25 continue. We are not to quarrel but to correct those who oppose themselves, in the chance that God will grant them repentance so that they may know the truth.
If you fail to correct the officer’s illegal actions, several things happen.
Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F.Supp 94:
“An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.”
In other words, he is a brutal vicious thug without any authority.
• Plummer v. Indiana, 136 Ind. 306: Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer’s life if necessary (not an exact quote)
• Housh v. Illinois, 75 Ill 491: “An arrest without warrant … or that fails to allege a crime is without jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. If the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.”
• W.V. v. Gum, 69 SE 463: “What rights then has a citizen in resisting an unlawful arrest? An arrest without warrant is a trespass, an unlawful assault upon the person, and how far one thus unlawfully assaulted may go in resistance is to be determined, as in other cases of assault…. And the authorities are uniform that where one is about to be unlawfully deprived of his liberty he may resist the aggressions of the offender, whether of a private citizen or a public officer, to the extent of taking the life of the assailant….”
• Washington State v. Rousseau, 40 Wn.2d at 94: “It is the law that a person illegally arrested by an officer may resist that arrest, even to the extent of the taking of life, if his own life or any great bodily harm is threatened.”
• DO NOT CITE ANY OF THE ABOVE CASES, THEY HAVE ALL BEEN MODIFIED BY POLITICIANS.
Try this one:
US Supreme Court’s John Elk v. US, 177 US 529:
“… where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. … the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
IF YOU DON’T STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS, YOU WILL LOSE THEM.
VERY SOON we will lose all our rights. Learn how to defend yourself in court.
Judges use a maxim of law “Those who refuse to fight must lose” (Although not Roman, this Shetar law worked itself into our laws).
I recommend an 1884 book by Count Leo Tolstoy, What I Believe. His Christian country was being overthrown by Communist sympathizers. He analyzes all the fuss over might and right.
—- ===== ==== ===== —-
Steven D. Miller is a freelance writer producing informative blog posts, white papers, eBooks and high-density documentaries. He is available to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free. Contact him at Steven.Miller@LibertyContentWriter.com