A funny thing happened on the way to the forum.

Does the United States Government really exist? Or was the Constitutional Convention forum a sham? The Constitution was signed in 1787. It was ratified in 1788.

Most people presume that the existing U.S. Government was properly created. And most people also presume that the civil servants’ chain of custody properly transferred a legit government down to us today. Join me in pondering the lies that enslave us.

The U.S. Supreme Court will never rule on the legitimacy of government. They always rule that it is a political issue to be decided politically.

New York City was the capital of the United States in 1789, when the original federal officers were sworn into office. But a funny thing happened on the way to the forum.

New York City has a curious history in the scheme of federal oaths of office.

According to the very first Journal of the Senate, New York failed to send a senator to the senate until the others had sworn their oaths of office to questionable authorities.

An oath is always taken to a superior. An oath is taken to a foreign authority is mutiny against lawful authority. See my book on Oaths. Or read Hebrews 6:16 in your Bible.

New York still had NO Senators in the Senate when, on April 30, 1789, it came time to swear in George Washington as President. The Speaker of the House was informed by the Vice President that the oath would be administered by the Chancellor of the state of New York (even though New York was still not represented in either the House or the Senate.)

What is a Chancellor? Answer: A Chancellor represents a high authority.
But what high authority did the non-New-York Senators swear allegiance to?

  • Was the Chancellor “a Roman Catholic priest heading the office in which diocesan business is transacted and recorded.” Or was the Chancellor a representative of the King of England?
  • According to the Encyclopedia Britannica 11th Edition article on Chancellor, Volume V, page 833: “all petitions addressed to the king passed through his hands.”
  • According to Webster’s Dictionary first edition, “From the Roman Empire, this office passed to the church, and hence every bishop has his chancellor“.

It wasn’t until June 3, 1789 that the Senators were sworn to obey the Constitution, but New York was still absent.

It was not until July 25, 1789 that a New York Senator showed up. The second New York Senator showed up a few days later. They are not mentioned as ever swearing to obey the Constitution.

For the first 176 days of “your” federal government, New York did not participate in the Senate. New York Senators had no federal authority, even though NYC was purportedly the Capital of the United States.

By what authority?

Meanwhile over on the House side, According to the Journal of the House of Representatives:
On April 7, 1789 although New York still had NO congressman represented, the House of Representatives requested a non-federal official, the Chief Justice of the State of New York, administer the Congressmen’s oaths of office.

A funny thing happened on the way to the forum.

To administer the oaths, the Chief Justice of New York brings with him a New York City representative and a Continental Congressman. New York state congressmen did not participate. Still NO federal authority.

On April 18 we see the names of three New York congressmen on a list of Congressmen, but none are mentioned as present or as having taken their oath of office. One of these three is mentioned later on May 9 as “appeared and took his seat”.

New York had 6 Congressman according to Article 1, section 2. The other three were also members of the Continental Congress, and are not mentioned as having appeared.

What is the possibility that The Constitutional Convention was convened under the Articles of Confederation in order to reorganize the national debt (the 18 million Lira that we borrowed but could not pay — link: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fr-1782.asphttp://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fr-1782.asp
— the note that Ben Franklin signed with his British title (ESQ) for the purpose of getting enough taxing authority to satisfy the creditor?

The Constitution was constituted by constitutors. Oh my.

Today’s BIRTH REGISTRATION policy is a result of all this subversion.

Speaking of getting enough taxing authority to satisfy the creditor; SSNs for newborn children put them up as collateral for the national debt. They are owned as slaves by our creditors. Communist China is our biggest creditor.

In the next paragraph, I am going to quote a Federal Regulation that deceptively refers to the UN as if it was New York City. To understand the legal definition of the term “New York City” as it used in the Code of Federal Regulations, you must first understand that the UN has its headquarters in New York City, and that UNITED NATIONS LAW SUPERSEDES ANY FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL LAW “WITHIN THE HEADQUARTERS DISTRICT”. This is according to a federal law known as Title 22 U.S. Code section 287(d); Section 8. Apparently New York City is on UN soil.

While keeping in mind that New York City, as you know it, is not a State, and is not even the Capital of New York State, notice how federal Social Security regulations refer to New York City (the headquarters of the United Nations) as a State:

Title 20, Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 111 Subpart B 422.103(b)(2): “(2) Birth registration document. SSA may enter into an agreement with officials of a State, including, for this purpose, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and New York City, to establish, as part of the official birth registration process, a procedure to assist SSA in assigning social security numbers to newborn children.”

Perhaps someone can explain the above quoted law. Tell me if I have this right: Social Security numbers have been assigned for eight decades, but now officials of the UN headquarters district can establish a new procedure to assign Social Security numbers. Hummm.

After you read my notes on birth certificates, return here and study this until you convince yourself that a birth certificate is prima facie evidence that you are, at best, a PERSON without birthrights, and at worst, property of a government. Then reread my notes on the GATT treaty requiring SSNs at birth (section 5 of my article on Social Security System, and also read section 9), originally HR5110. Birth certificates are registered, they are not recorded. Securities are registered.

If you have a welfare number you are a commodity in foreign commerce. Second Peter 2:3 (KJV) “And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you. At the soon fall of Babylon merchants will weep when souls cannot be traded in international commerce. Revelation 18:10-20 (and notice the last item of verse 13).

Conclusions:

You do not have the right to buy or sell. All domestic transactions are illegal (because you are an enemy of the state). The Secretary of the Treasury, who’s allegiance is to foreign powers, is already pre-approved to regulate your transactions according to 12 USC 95(b). Your SSN comes from this same authority. Your ID card is be issued by this same authority. The Catholic church has a legitimate claim on their property. By your own authority (signature), on a permanent irrevocable record you registered yourself into their system. This registration is somehow regulated by UN headquarters. You have a number of this authority. You cannot legally buy or sell without permission of this authority. The GATT treaty (with the EEC) requires SSNs at birth. The EEC was established at the Vatican. The National debt is owed to multinational banking cartels. These cartels were originally established by Catholic crusaders and the Knights Templar (when they were banned they became the Knights of Malta, the only non-country to have their passports recognized by the US government). Your national debt cannot be paid. Your future labor has been hypothecated as collateral for the national debt, and has been seized.

Welcome to your Novus Ordo Seclorum new world order.

Pay up.

— ===== ==== ===== —

Steven D. Miller is a freelance writer producing informative Articles, blog posts, newsletters, web pages, case studies, white papers, reports, eBooks and high-density documentaries. He is available to offer hope to any audience that yearns to breathe free. Contact him at Steven.Miller@LibertyContentWriter.com

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: