Posts

Debt Currency is unsustainable

by

Debt Currency is unsustainable
by Steven D. Miller

Many people believe that earning interest is a good thing.  Many people believe that charging interest is a wise business practice.  They have been brainwashed.

Federal Reserve Notes are instruments of debt.  They are borrowed into circulation*.   The U.S. Constitution only allows gold and silver coin minted by the U.S. Mint.  (see my essay The Constitution requires a balanced budget.)  State governments cannot emit bills of credit.

Even one percent interest is unsustainable. It will destroy us.  Usury is still illegal. Thou shalt not lend upon usury.  You agreed to be the collateral for the national debt, which is now unpayable.**

USURY BANKING

Usury is an abomination according to Ezekiel 18:13.

You have no right to accept or charge interest. Interest is a government granted privilege.  Government privileges can be regulated and taxed.

Interest is a government granted privilege that is granted by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1913 contrary to Biblical principles. The borrower is a slave to the lender (Proverbs 22:7). One percent interest is usury (Nehemiah 5:10-11). A Bible believer will never accept usury (Psalms 15:5, Ezekiel 18:13) or charge usury (Deuteronomy 23:19-20, Exodus 22:25).  Punished by death Ezekiel 18:13. In your own country, up until 1694, accepting or paying interest was a punishable crime. Government incorporated banks can give usury. In order to do this they need an SSN so that they can tax this government granted privilege. You might still be able to get a non-interest checking account without a number. By the way, Private banks can pay interest too, but they must pay a 10% tax for this government granted privilege (see US Supreme Court Veazie Bank v. Fenno, 75 US 533). There are no private banks left, other than the Federal Reserve.  A national banking system is the fifth plank of the Communist Manifesto .

Biblical Note: The very same unchanging Jesus Christ who said that not one jot nor tittle shall fall from the law also told the parable of the ten talents in which a master used sarcasm to rebuke an unprofitable servant. Luke 19:23. Sarcasm does not authorize usury. He was saying (my paraphrase): “So you think I’m a hardened criminal who reaps what he doesn’t sow, why then didn’t you go all the way and commit the crime of usury by depositing my money in a bank.”

Paying or collecting interest is still the crime of usury. But it is no longer punishable for those who want government to protect them from God’s laws. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 1913 case, German Alliance Insurance Co. v. Kansas, 233 U.S. 389 at page 432 that

“Moreover, interest laws were in their inception not a restriction upon the right of contract but an enlargement, permitting what theretofore had been regarded both as an ecclesiastical and civil offense. … they therefore fall within the rule that contemporary practice, if subsequently continued and universally acquiesced in, amounts to an interpretation of the Constitution.”

How do you like that? By turning our backs to an unchanging God we’ve let criminals, (theretofore regarded as a crime), now unpunishable, interpret our Constitution for us. This Supreme Court case paved the way, later in 1913, for Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act, which sealed our doom.

“No free people ever existed, or can ever exist, without keeping the purse strings in their own hands. Where this is the case, they have a constitutional check upon the administration, which may thereby by brought into order without violence. But when such a power is not lodged in the people, oppression proceeds uncontrolled in its career, till the governed, transported into rage, seek redress in the midst of blood and confusion.”
— John Dickinson, signer of the Constitution
“The Writings of John Dickinson”, p.364, Applewood Books

DEBT CURRENCY IS NOT CAPITALISM

In 1947 when it became obvious that the currency must collapse, your government created the CIA to delay the inevitable collapse.  The chaos around you is the death spasms of a system of greed.

You can find more information in my essay “Banks are the Enemy of Capitalism” http://NotFooledByGovernment.com/essays/banks-enemy-capitalism/

Federal Reserve Notes are debt.

They are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Your forced labor backs the Fed’s debt currency if the U.S. Treasury ever fails to pay a debt obligation.

You cannot pay a debt with another debt.

“There is a distinction between a debt discharged and one paid. When discharged the debt still exists, though divested of its character as a legal obligation during the operation of the discharge. Something of the original vitality of the debt continues to exist.”
— Stanek v. White. 172 Minn. 390, 215 N. W. 784

Stanek v. White continues: “which may be transferred, even though the transferee takes it subject to its disability incident to the discharge. The fact that it carries something which may be a consideration for a new promise to pay, so as to make an otherwise worthless promise a legal obligation, makes it the subject of transfer by assignment.”

Black’s Law Dictionary definition of Constitutor

LICENSE

A license is permission to do something illegal. Licentiousness is for sale by your corrupt government.
Business has always been questionable. A peril to the soul.
The term “business” is used in many legal definitions, for example in the legal definition of “employee”, where it is the usury of labor.  Usury has always been a sin.  Usury is an abomination,  It is a curse upon the land, Isaiah 24:2-3.  In the U.S. up until 1694, accepting or paying interest was a punishable crime.
More information is on my essay about the changing definition of the word license  http://NotFooledByGovernment.com/driving/500-2/

People are destroyed for lack of knowledge.  Avoid, if possible, your indentured servitude to pay off the national debt.  Do not be deceived into waiving your rights by legalities that you don’t understand.
http://NotFooledByGovernment.com/knowledge-leads-to-wisdom/

What you bound on earth will be bound in heaven. Matthew 18:18. Including the unpayable national debt usury and the “work of national importance” that you swore you would provide. (Christ warned you never to swear Matthew 5:34, least ye be damned James 5:12) The smoke of your torment shall rise forever in the presence of the Lamb, and you shall have no rest day nor night. Debtor’s prisons are here. Watch the PBS video www.video.pbs.org/video/2365390673

You may also be interested in:

My essay From Whom Do the Kings of the Earth Exact Tribute http://NotFooledByGovernment.com/essays/kings-earth-take-tribute/
And my essay Social Security Numbers are Not Required  and don’t miss my 30 minute video on socialism at the end.

Footnotes:

*(Whereas postage stamps are spent into circulation.)  The Federal Reserve Bank is a private corporation that has never been audited.  They purchase U.S Treasury bonds and agree to repay with interest.  They then borrow the printing presses at the U.S. Treasury to print their notes. Notes are IOUs.  Their notes are then distributed to their member banks for circulation to those who dare to use them.  Their technical term is “monetize the debt”.   (and I have not mentioned the magic of fractional reserve to create money from nothing).  If the debt is ever re-paid the note is retired from circulation.  When an IOU is repaid the IOU note is redeemed (canceled). There should be no notes in circulation. (see my essay The Constitution requires a balanced budget.)

** Visit USdebtClock.org to see the U.S. Debt per taxpayer at the top, and Unfunded Liabilities per taxpayer at the bottom of their page.

If you want to support my blog efforts, I now accept donations through a secure PayPal link: DONATE

 

Why does Roe v. Wade remain so controversial?

by

by Steven D. Miller

Every January 22 the feminists rally in Washington to celebrate the anniversary of a Supreme Court decision that the liberals claim “grants rights” to feminists.  The more radicalized feminists believe that they have an absolute right to be an individual, and a baby deprives them of this absolute right.  They characterize their own baby as a parasite.

Government protects the most vulnerable humans from corporal assaults. You would not want it to be otherwise.

The nation’s founders represented the people. They called themselves “We The People,” They held the truth that all children were created equal, and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. That among those rights was the right to life. That to secure this right, governments are instituted among men. They said that one purpose of government was to secure the blessings of liberty to their posterity. Men defend their families. That is why we created government.

“Pro-Choice” means “Anti-Consequences”. The first sentence of the Declaration of Independence says it is the Laws of Nature that entitle the United States to exist. To petition government for redress of the Laws of Nature is to ask government to deny its legitimacy.

Liberal wackos always want to be god* because they cannot tolerate a righteous God. They believe that governments grant rights, whereas governments can take away rights, not grant them.  The purpose of government is to protect pre-existing rights. Feminists like Susan B. Anthony, quoted below, all agreed that abortion was the crime of murder. The extremists ignore that government is entitled to execute murderers.

Murder

Here is a Supreme Court abortion brief that mentions murder 11 times. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/185196/20210729093557582_210169a%20Amicus%20Brief%20for%20efiling%207%2029%2021.pdf

Why should this affect you?

According to the Declaration of Independence, governments are instituted among men to secure the Creator-endowed rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  If the Supreme Court cannot protect the right to innocent life, how can they protect YOUR right to life?   Is your own right to life now subject to their “equal protection of the law”; equal to the rights of the innocent? OR has the purpose of government changed?  OR is there something that you are not being told?

Abortion is part of the planned destruction of America. Many people are fooled into thinking that abortion is legal, but they don’t bother to find out if this is true. Abortion is still murder of the innocent.

Americans have killed more than 56 million babies. (Source). Their blood cries out for justice. We kill about 3,000 American babies every day — about the same number of lives lost in the 9/11 terror attack.  Yet no one cries out for justice.  Source.

ROE V. WADE DID NOT LEGALIZE ABORTION.

Proof #1 – In the Roe v. Wade court case, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the abortion doctor, Dr. James Hubert Hallford remanded back to Texas for his punishment.  Read the case for yourself here.

Proof #2 – The court case Roe v. Wade was about Fourteenth Amendment due process privacy, NOT about abortion. The Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade found a way — through the Fourteenth Amendment* — to prohibit government snooping into the first trimester of a pregnancy. Government cannot snoop to find the crime of abortion during the first trimester. (Just as Murder — or any other crime — that is committed in the privacy of a closet has Constitutional protection against government snooping without a search warrant. But when the crime becomes known, it must be prosecuted.) Once government knows of a crime, they are required to prosecute. To state otherwise is to deny the very purpose of government.

*The Abortion privacy considered in Roe v. Wade is ONLY a Fourteenth Amendment right. (the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified after the Civil War to give federal benefits to the freed slaves who had no other means of support. Yet Roe was a white girl who had nothing to do with freed slaves.)

Proof #3 – The definition of Murder did not change.  Seven years after Roe v. Wade, Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition was published.  It kept the traditional definition of the term murder to specifically include intentional killing of a fetus.

 

Proof #4 – Abortion (during the first trimester, if unreported to government prosecutors) was decriminalized, it was not legalized. Roe v. Wade was based on a precedence case that decriminalized (but did not legalize) family privacy.
The Supreme Court relied heavily on their prior decision in Griswold v. Connecticut* 381 U.S. 479, which decriminalized condom use by married couples. But that case only decriminalized, it did not legalize, condom use by married couples. *

*  In Griswold v. Connecticut 381 US 479, the Supreme Court determined that married couples can privately use condoms. But this was a 14th Amendment due process concern. And ONLY a due-process concern. It was not a Fourth Amendment privacy case. In fact, no one ever claimed that there was anything wrong with the written law. The only complaint was the way it was enforced. The argument being decided was “that the accessory statute as applied violated the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Proof #5 – The Supreme Court could not have taken the case if the facts were known. The entire case is based on fraud. Roe v. Wade was based on a lie. Miss Roe, whose real name was Norma McCorvey later confessed that she was NOT the victim of a rape by three men. She wanted Texas law to be changed to allow legal abortions of rape victims (which she was not). The Supreme Court will not take a case from someone not damaged by government (according to their Ashwander case).

Those who have overthrown one nation, under God, want you to believe that abortion was legalized, so that sex will have no consequences. Yet the LORD of the Bible invented sex with life and death consequences.

As you can see from the very limited scope of Roe v. Wade as a privacy case that clarified the Griswold decision “that the accessory statute as applied violated the Fourteenth Amendment.”  It should therefore not be surprising that the Supreme Court would also maintain the strict limits of the privacy scope. Which it has done:  

  • In Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. 490 (1989), The Supreme Court in Webster allowed for states to legislate in an aspect that had previously been thought to be forbidden under Roe v. Wade
  • In Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), The Supreme Court created the standards used by the Court in deciding any laws that restrict abortion. The ruling in Planned Parenthood v. Casey has allowed states to create and pass more laws that restrict access to abortion.

Innocent blood is on your hands if your Congressional representative authorized murder with your consent, on your behalf, in your name.

We kill 3,000 babies every day and no one seems to care. The 9-11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center didn’t even kill that many people.

GOVERNMENT ONCE PROTECTED RIGHTS OF THE UNBORN

International treaties already recognize abortion as genocide. The Genocide Treaty, 78 UNTS 277 defines the crime of genocide, in time of peace or in time of war, to include “… in whole or in part … measures taken to prevent births within the [ethnical, racial, or religious] group”.

And courts have ruled that an unborn fetus is sometimes a person for personal injury or wrongful death, and for other reasons (but not for 14th Amendment purposes).

Stem cell research cannot be funded with federal funds because it requires the destruction of a human embryo. Yet we kill full term babies during their birth while politicians say “they’re just temporarily alive anyway”.

When the prosecutors and politicians wink at the murders, then the very purpose of government is ignored.

Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 469-471.

In a government of laws, the existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.”

Senator Obama, while debating an abortion bill that would recognize Constitutional rights of babies that survive a failed partial-birth abortion, insisted that they should be killed because “they’re just temporarily alive anyway”. What’s next? Now that your health care is to be decided by Obamacare — what will happen to you if you have a terminal prognosis? Are you “just temporarily alive anyway”?

GOVERNMENT ONCE DEFENDED THOSE WHO COULD NOT DEFEND THEMSELVES. It was one of the main reasons that we created a government. What better way to destroy America than to fool people into thinking that innocent lives cannot qualify for government protection? Yes, you too are “just temporarily alive anyway”.

TAX SUPPORTED ABORTION?

And now they go as far as taxing you to fund the crimes that they refuse to prosecute. If you pay 1040 income tax, then blood is on your hands.

That to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical.” — The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 2, p. 545

RELIGIOUS INFLUENCE

The unchanging God of the Bible promises to curse any nation that sheds innocent blood. What better way to destroy America than to fool us into thinking that abortion is legal? Can you sense that America is cursed? Can you hear the innocent blood screaming out to God?

Abstinence is required of Christians. 1st Corinthians 6:9 fornicators will not inherit the Kingdom of God.

Bastards cannot enter the congregation of the Lord unto the tenth generation – Deuteronomy 23:2

Ritual Sacrifice of children

Throughout the history of pagan rituals, rulers in authority have “enjoyed” the authority to dominate and obliterate innocence.

Unfortunately 3000 innocent babies are killed EVERY DAY in America to satisfy the blood lusts of rulers-in-authority.  Pelosi and Biden and Pedosta all are Catholic. Hillary admired Margret Sanger. Search the internet for Podesta art collection and notice the similarities with Jeffery Dahmer’s photos of his murdered victims.

The 9-11 terrorist attack killed 3000 Americans and everybody thought it was an outrage. But these hypocrites cannot think that way. They insist that they are self-appointed gods. But they remain Whited Sepulchers.

THE LAW OF THE LAND concerning unborn

The common law remains in force until there are legislated “express words of nullity”. Here is the law of the land:

In Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary we find:

IN VENTRE SA MERE. In his mother’s womb.
2. – 1. In law a child is for all beneficial purposes considered as born while in ventre sa mere. 5 T. R. 49; Co. Litt. 36; 1 P. Wms. 329; Civ. Code of Lo. art. 948. But a stranger can acquire no title by descent through a child in ventre sa mere, who is not subsequently born alive. See Birth; Dead Born.
3. – 2. Such a child is enabled to have an estate limited to his use. 1. Bl. Com. 130.
4. – 3. May have a distributive share of intestate property. 1 Ves. 81.
5. – 4. Is capable of taking a devise of lands. 2 Atk. 117; 1 Freem. 224, 298.
6. – 5. Takes under a marriage settlement a provision made for children living at the death of the father. 1 Ves. 85.
7. – 6. Is capable of taking a legacy, and is entitled to a share in a fund bequeathed to children under a general description, of “children,” or of “children living at the testator’s death.” 2 H. Bl. 399; 2 Bro. C. C. 320; S. C. 2 Ves. jr. 673; 1 Sim. & Stu. 181; 1 B. & P. 243; 5 T. R. 49. See, also, 1 Ves. sr. 85; Id. 111; 1 P. Wms. 244, 341; 2 Bro. C. C. 63; Amb. 708, 711; 1 Salk. 229; 2 P. Wms. 446; 2 Atk. 114; Pre. Ch. 50; 2 Vern. 710; 3 Ves. 486; 7 T. R. 100; 4 Ves. 322; Bac. Ab. Legacies, &c., A; 1 Rop. Leg. 52, 3; 5 Serg. & Rawle, 40.
8. – 7. May be appointed executor. Bac. Ab. Infancy, B.
9. – 8. A bill may be brought in its behalf, and the court will grant an injunction to stay waste. 2 Vern. 710 Pr. Ch. 50.
10. – 9. The mother, of a child in ventre sa mere may detain writings on its behalf. 2 Vern. 710.
11. – 10. May have a guardian assigned to it. 1 Bl. Com. 130.
12. – 11. The destruction of such a child is a high misdemeanor. 1 Bl. Com. 129, 130.
13. – 12. And the birth of a posthumous child amounts, in Pennsylvania, to the revocation of a will previously executed, so far as regards such child. 3 Binn. 498. See Coop. Just. 496. See, as to the law of Virginia on this subject, 3 Munf. 20. Vide Foetus.

In Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme court spent 3 pages saying that the term “person” used in the Fourteenth Amendment did not include the unborn. The word Person, as a legal term, comes from the Latin word personae which means “an actor’s mask”. People are not persons. Black’s Law Dictionary put it this way:

Notice that they are still considered to be children.

WOMEN’S RIGHTS?

When did the Women’s movement decide that abortion was a right?

  • Why do women who say they are standing on a proud tradition of civil rights advances, now deny the history of women’s rights?
  • How did the women’s rights movement evolve from Alice Paul’s statement “Abortion is the ultimate exploitation of women.” to somehow conclude that abortion is now liberation?

Susan B. Anthony considered abortion to be child murder with two murderers, and anyone who promoted abortion to be thrice guilty of murder.

SUSAN B. ANTHONY wrote in her publication The Revolution July 8, 1869:

“Guilty? Yes. No matter what the motive, love of ease, or a desire to save from suffering the unborn innocent, the woman is awfully guilty who commits the deed. It will burden her conscience in life, it will burden her soul in death; But oh, thrice guilty is he who drove her to the desperation which impelled her to the crime!”

Also from Anthony’s newspaper, The Revolution, She recognized the need to “eradicate the most monstrous crime” of abortion from society: “When a woman destroys the life of her unborn child, it is a sign that, by education or circumstances, she has been greatly wronged.”

Elizabeth Cady Stanton: “When we consider that women are treated as property, it is degrading to women that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit.”

Alice Paul (the author of the original Equal Rights Amendment) said “Abortion is the ultimate exploitation of women.”

Victoria Woodhull (America’s first female presidential candidate): “Every woman knows that if she were free, she would never think of murdering a child before its birth.”

Mattie Brinkerhoff. Matilda Gage. Emma Goldman. Sarah Norton. All of the founding feminists were against abortion.

PLANNED PARENTHOOD

There are 30 Planned Parenthood executives that make more than $200,000 a year. A few make more than $300,000 a year. Planned Parenthood gets over 400 million dollars each year from the federal government. Source.

Margaret Sanger was the founder of the organization that became Planned Parenthood. Her goal was sterilization of “genetically inferior races”. She said “the most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

In her 1922 book Pivot of Civilization she called for the extermination of “weeds… overrunning the human garden”. And the segregation of “misfits, and the maladjusted”; and for the sterilization of “genetically inferior races.”

In her 1922 book entitled Women, Morality, and Birth Control, she wrote “Birth Control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”

She proposed model legislation in her 1934 book Code to Stop Overproduction of Children that would have required “no woman shall have a legal right to bear a child without a permit … no permit shall be valid for more than one child.”

She coined the phrase “birth control” and she defined it as “the process of weeding out the unfit”

She often said, “all our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class.”

In her magazine, Birth Control Review, contributor Lothrop Stoddard, who also served on Sanger’s board of directors, wrote in the article The Rising Tide of Color Against the White World that “We must resolutely oppose both Asiatic permeation of white race areas and Asiatic inundation of those non-white, but equally non-Asiatic regions…”

In her autobiography she singled out the Asiatic races “the incessant fertility of … millions spread like a plague.”

In 1939 she and Clarence Gamble made the proposal called Birth Control and the Negro, to help “the poorer areas … ” with birth control to “ease the financial load of caring for with public funds…. Children destined to become a burden to themselves, to their family, and ultimately to the nation.”

When the Nazi’s put her plans into practice she panicked and changed her rhetoric. The term “Birth Control” became “Family Planning”. The “unfit” and “dysgenic” became simply “the poor” and The American Birth Control League became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

After she thought that the past was safely buried, the founder of Planned Parenthood wrote to Gamble prior to her death in 1966 “We do not want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

Margret Sanger fundraising for her cause.

Hillary Clinton at the 2009 Planned Parenthood Honors Gala in Houston, Texas had this to say about Margaret Sanger:

I admire Margret Sanger enormously. Her courage, her tenacity, her vision …  I’m really in awe of her. There are a lot of lessons we can learn from her life, from the causes she launched and fought for and scarified for so greatly.”

Planned parenthood GENOCIDE is now paid for by your tax dollars.

SEX EDUCATION IS PLANNED PREGNANCY

Teenagers are now a commodity in a Billion dollar a year abortion industry.

When abortion providers go into a school to teach sex education their goal is to promote sexual activity hoping to sell abortions.

According to a Planned Parenting whistle-blower in the Washington Times letters to the editor April 20, 1997.

“Abortion is a skillfully managed product sold to frightened young women at a crisis time of her life. As abortion providers, we knew that any time we went into a school, the pregnancy rate was going to go up by 50 percent. We knew we could sell abortions to every single classroom, but we couldn’t just go in and say, ‘look, our goal is actually for you to have three to five abortions between the ages of 13 and 18’ No, no, we couldn’t do that. So we said, ‘you know these kids need to abstain and we know that, but they’re not going to abstain, so we must teach them how to have safe sex’… get them sexually active – get them on a method of birth control. ”

They deliberately prescribe a low-dose birth control pill with a high rate of pregnancy. When the teenager calls for counseling the counselors are “skillfully trained to overcome every objection”

BABY ROE

Roe of Roe v. Wade did not have an abortion. The fetus in the case that started it all has grown up into a pro-lifer.

Baby Roe was adopted out after her birth. She was attending college when Toby Hanft, who runs a San Francisco adoption search agency, tracked her down in 1989. She had no idea who her real family was. Imagine finding out that you were the one who caused the extermination of one-third of your generation.

Roe’s real name was Norma McCorvey. When she was told that her daughter had been located she said “I don’t want to hurt my child in any way.” She had already admitted that she lied in her battle to obtain a legal abortion. That’s right. The ruling that is still ripping America apart is based on a lie.

NO KIDDING
Calling human children kids is stupid.
It is not a coincidence that pagans call children kids.
A kid is a young goat. Young Goats are the only creatures that the Bible requires blood sacrifice for the sins of the people (Leviticus 16:15).
Satan’s disciples want you to lie, steal and kill.

EVERY CHILD IS A WANTED CHILD

Every State now has laws that allow desperate moms to abandon their newborn at “a safe haven” location.

RECOMMENDED MOVIE

Gosnell: The Trial of America’s Biggest Serial Killer.   American abortion provider who was convicted of murdering three infants who were born alive during attempted abortion procedures.

OPTIONS FOR PREGNANT MOMS:
Here are some resources to support moms with a difficult prenatal diagnosis:

+*+*+*+*+*+*+

*  Footnote: liberal wackos in the late 1800’s demanded government licensed marriage so that rapists could be forced to marry their pregnant victims — so that the innocent children could have rights, contrary to God’s law that bastards cannot have rights.
Liberals are still playing god.

 

Did you voluntarily forfeit your rights?

by

We are all created equal.  “We The People” created a government and delegated to them the 18 things they would be authorized to do.  In turn, government authority controls their inferiors. Don’t volunteer to be inferior to your former equals.

Texas Supreme Court in Dallas v. Mitchell, 245 SW 944:

“The rights of the individual are not derived from governmental agencies, … or even from the Constitution, but they exist inherently in every man, and are merely reaffirmed in the Constitution and restricted only to the extent they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government.”

The U.S. Supreme Court in the Cruikshank case, 92 US at 551:

“It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government.”

Your natural birth did NOT voluntarily submit yourself to the federal government. You voluntarily entered the federal government when you signed a federal form. You also have to be “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”. See Elk v. Wilkins 112 U.S. 94, for the extent to which you must be subject. (” not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to…“)

We are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights. That to secure those rights governments are instituted among men.

MYTH 1

Some people believe we must forfeit rights and freedoms to have a “civil and orderly” society. The social compact theory of government says we give up some rights when we enter society. Yet twenty-nine years after the Constitution was written, this theory was refuted by Thomas Jefferson when he warned about this emerging dangerous theory.

According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_compact:

“Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate (or to the decision of a majority), in exchange for protection of their remaining rights.”

Thomas Jefferson was there and he never had such a thought:

“the idea is quite unfounded that on entering into society we give up any natural rights.” – Jefferson letter to F. W. Gilmer 1816.

Back in 1774 Jefferson wrote:

“These are our grievances, which we have thus laid before his Majesty, with that freedom of language and sentiment which becomes a free people, claiming their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.” Jefferson, Rights of British America, 1774, page 141.

Notice Jefferson’s word entering. You voluntarily enter society.  Lawyers* hinder your entering into the society of equals, just like it was in Luke 11:52.

For the sad story of how you volunteered into government, read my eBook The Citizen Cannot Complain.

MYTH 2

Some people believe that freedom is bad. They believe that they can somehow control danger by inventing in their own mind the “right” to decide which liberties others can, and cannot have.

True freedom removes that imagined “right” to control your liberty.

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
— Benjamin Franklin, November 11, 1755; Reply to the Governor.
source: https://www.bartleby.com/73/1056.html

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-

* Whether it’s the high cost of lawyers’ fees or growing distrust of lawyers, there is a mounting trend these days for more people to fight without a lawyer.

The American Bar Association (ABA) reports:
• 60% of the public can’t afford a lawyer.
• 20% simply don’t want to spend the money.
• 50% just don’t trust lawyers!

Yet ½ of all court proceedings involve at least one pro-se party.

Too many pro-se people lose … needlessly!

Ever wonder why you were never taught anything about court procedure or the rules of evidence in your tax-supported schools?

Who benefits from your legal ignorance?
You guessed it. Lawyers!

People using the  “How to Win in Court” course are winning!  If you don’t have a lawyer — understand what YOU should be doing. All the basic law procedures are explained in  “How To Win In Court” self-help course.

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-

Did “We The People” delegate to the artificial entity they created an authority that we did not ourselves have? Have they given life to our graven image that it should both speak and demand reverence and to kill? Have they given the graven image a right to demand worship (such as salute, courtroom oaths, perjury oaths)? Have they given the graven image a right to issue credentials so that all might receive a mark? 

For more information read my eBook Oaths: Mandatory or Voluntary.

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-

 

 

Are we living in a computer simulation?

by

The 1999 movie The Matrix portrays life as a computer simulation where people are serving the global machinery by having their life’s energy sapped from them in exchange for the benefits of illusion.  Don’t dismiss this as fiction.
• Elon Musk Says We’re Likely Living In a Video Game.  “…our own reality might not be distinguishable from a simulation” (link)
• Stephen Hawking argued that agency and free will are nothing but an illusion.  http://www.sociology.org/many-worlds-but-only-one-reality-stephen-hawking-and-the-determinist-fallacy/
• Scientific American article Are We Living in a Computer Simulation? published in April 2016 reports on a debate of this theory hosted at the American Museum of Natural History.  Moderator Neil deGrasse Tyson put the odds at 50-50 that our entire existence is a computer program.
•  The End of Quantum Reality a documentary explaining why the CERN Large Hadron Collider will never produce proof of our physics-based reality.
• Are you living in a computer simulation? By Nick Bostrom (professor of Philosophy, Oxford University) Philosophical Quarterly 2003:

“(3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.”

• You are in a Simulation. TED talk by Nobel Prize Winner Professor George Smoot  link: https://youtu.be/Chfoo9NBEow
• also see Washington Post interview with Theoretical physicist Dr. Jim Gates http://www.msn.com/en-in/video/entertainment/are-we-living-in-a-matrix-a-theoretical-physicist-explains/vp-BBw3vxs  

 

These are not stupid people.  Perhaps you should pay attention.  Wake up and feel your puppet strings.

One of Einstein’s young assistants was there at the beginning of Quantum Physics in 1934.  Dr. Nathan Rosen co-wrote the paper The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.  He died in 1995, knowing that the Large Hadron Collider would be built.  Over his lifetime he noticed how the theories of matter evolved from (1) Matter is made of particles to (2) Matter is made of fields to (3) Matter is made of information.

Simulation Hypothesis by Rizwan Virk, a graduate from both MIT and Stanford.  An MIT game designer shows how AI, quantum physics and eastern mystics all agree that we are in a video game.

Digital Consciousness: A Transformative Vision by Jim Elvidge

“A new provocative view of the true nature of reality… have you ever felt that there was something odd about the world we live in? like there is something about reality that isn’t quite random, as it should be? something a little too organized, a little too planned, a little too programmed?”

“… the book that will change the way you look at your world, your life, your family and friends, and the computer on your desk…”

Our reality is not what it appears to be, according to Jim Elvidge. The latest physics experiments demonstrate that an objective reality does not exist. Elvidge explains interconnectedness, anomalous events, and how a different view of reality makes anomalous experiences possible. Elvidge states that the search for an ultimate reality has been around since at least the time of the ancient Greeks, when Plato proposed that the world we experience is like shadows on a cave wall. He points out that there is “something there when we are not looking at it”. Everyone sees things a little differently, and when this gets to the quantum level, the degree that something can be precisely predicted disappears.

Elvidge does not believe (like physicist Nick Bostrum) that we are living in a vast computer simulation. His theory is that our “apparent physical reality” is something that was invented by some sort of vast or universal consciousness that is continually evolving to give all beings the chance to “learn and experience time.”  He believes that this theory of the universe matches well with ancient spiritual traditions as well as quantum physics. Elvidge refers to our experience on this planet and throughout or lives as the “reality learning lab” which consists of the interactions of our consciousness with others and with the universal mind.

He says his model fits well with explanations for many “paranormal issues” that are present, but do not follow the rules of physics as we know them.

 

Obamacare constitutionality?

by

Obamacare constitutionality?

The Affordable Care Act was recently declared unconstitutional in a Texas court.

Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber defended his healthcare bill after it had been ruled unconstitutional by a Texas federal judge.  In a CNN appearance 12/15/2018, Obamacare architect Gruber, who said in 2013 that Obamacare’s passage depended on the “stupidity of the American voter,” now claims the US Supreme Court will not understand the Constitution.  He said “The Supreme Court clearly does not represent the constitutional expertise of the broad Senate constitutional experts, …” (source).   Gruber also told us in 2013 that “Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage.” in passing of the Obamacare law.

In 2012 The Supreme Court declared that Obamacare was constitutional as a tax. (National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius).  Because it was a tax.     This is very similar to why Social Security is also valid as a tax.  For the long sad story on SS, read my essay Things The Government Forgot to tell you about Social Security.

Here are my notes on Socialized Health Care.

Forced health care is not insurance. Socialized medicine is not health care. Don’t be fooled by a government created health care crisis.

Socialized medicine cannot work. It has already reduced America’s infant survival rate to 35th in the world (38th on the UN list) and American’s life expectancy to 31st.  And childbirth deaths of American moms have reduced our survival rate to 46th in the world.  Our downfall started in 1986 when Congress passed the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act to force hospitals to give away their best services.

Government has a right to regulate what it funds. This gives them jurisdiction.  Once you volunteer to receive government regulated health care, they have the authority to limit what they fund.  Government health care is voluntary — you can still get private health care or private insurance.  If you think others should be forced to pay for your problems, then you just might get what you deserve.  Limited resources must be rationed. Socialism cannot recognize individual rights.

Socialized medicine will only bring the same misery that exists in every country that tries it. For example:

  • in Britain, 6% of the people end up pulling their own teeth.
  • In Canada, it takes 6 months to a year to get a MRI scan while your aggressive tumor is growing, and until the scan confirms your “tentative diagnosis” you cannot get onto another long waiting list for treatment.
  • Britain has socialized health care. Hospitals make millions euthanizing patients. Link.  Their Doctors can even add the words “without consent” to Do-Not-Resuscitate orders.  Link.
  • The document Shattered Lives has one hundred horror stories of the misery promised by socialized health care in Britain, Canada, Australia, Japan, Sweden and New Zealand.
  • Hitler was a socialist. He had a solution for useless eaters.
  • China has death vans. 24 death vans in every big city. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1165416/Chinas-hi-tech-death-van-criminals-executed-organs-sold-black-market.html
PARTICIPATION WITH SOCIALISM: IS IT MANDATORY?
  • Invito beneficium non datur. No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent.
  • Omnes licentiam habere his quae pro se indulta sunt, renunciare. All persons shall have liberty to renounce those privileges which have been conferred for their benefit.
  • Amish will never get insurance because it is proof that you don’t trust God.
  • Obamacare is not mandatory. Federal Law Title 42 USC § 18115 – Freedom not to participate in Federal health insurance programs.

The U.S. Supreme Court determined:

“The underlying basis for the doctrine of informed consent is a patient’s right of self-determination, the right to intelligently decide whether to choose or decline a particular medical procedure. — Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250, 251, 11 S.Ct. 1000, 1001, 35 L.Ed. 734, (1891) and Acuna v. Turkish, 192 N.J. 399, 414, 930 A.2d 416 (2007)

Don’t volunteer. The nice men in the white lab coats might take you to the Obamacare death panel.

HISTORY

Benjamin Rush, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, during the Constitutional debates in 1787:

The Constitution of this Republic should make special provision for medical freedom. To restrict the art of healing to one class will constitute the Bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic. … Unless we put medical freedom into the constitution the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship and force people who wish doctors and treatment of their own choice to submit to only what the dictating outfit offers.”

President Franklin Pierce in 1854 vetoed our nation’s first health care bill — a bill to help the mentally ill. His veto said

“I cannot find any authority in the Constitution for public charity…. [this] would be contrary to the letter and the spirit of the Constitution and subversive to the whole theory upon which the Union of these States is founded.”

And Congress cannot impose health care costs on employers according to the US Supreme Court in Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co. 295 U.S. 330:

“The catalog of means and actions which might be imposed upon an employer in any business, tending to the satisfaction and comfort of his employees, seems endless. Provision for free medical attendance, nursing, clothing, food, housing, and education of children, and a hundred other matters might with equal propriety by proposed as tending to relieve the employee of mental strain and worry. Can it fairly be said that the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce extends to the prescription of any or all of these things? Is it not apparent that they are really and essentially related solely to the social welfare of the worker, and therefore remote from any regulation of commerce as such? We think the answer is plain. These matters obviously lie outside the orbit of congressional power.” [May 6, 1935]

If health care costs are out of control, it is because Congress wanted the problems. Hospitals are forced to give away their best services to people who will not pay. You end up paying. This is outright socialism. Government interference with health care is part of the planned destruction of America.

The problems caused by too much government interference are not a logical excuse to demand more government interference.

The Affordable Care Act is a scam.
  • It cuts $580 Billion out of Medicare.
  • It adds 20 Million new patients into Medicaid.
  • 21 percent of our gross domestic product will be spent on health care by 2020. Just imagine spending 21% of your wages on other people’s health care.

Why were you swindled into paying for a phony health care scam just because health may be a necessity of life? Food is also a necessity of life, but congress does not yet force the best restaurants to give away their food to those who will not pay for it.  Just imagine what the menu prices would be. It is the same with the health care free market. Welcome to the hospital menu of $19 aspirins and $30 band aids.

Expanding Medicare to everyone is not a solution. Medicare has never controlled costs, other than restricting what doctors can charge.

How can you live in a free country if others get to decide what medicines you can take to save your life?  Who owns you?  If you want to become property of the government, then don’t force me to join you.

The obvious cure to the cost problem is to deregulate health care. Then keep deregulating until hospitals charge two cents per aspirin and a nickel for a band-aid. Then deregulate some more until doctors are paid better than lawyers.

The Model Health Law enacted by most states has already assumed that you will have no rights during a pandemic, but the proposed health care bill will only increase the risks of pandemic. For a glimpse at how your rights disappeared, read the Model Health legislation  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_State_Emergency_Health_Powers_Act   http://publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA.pdf

The United States ALREADY has the highest health care costs per capita of any nation by far ($9,800 per person). Yet, the United States ranks 31st in life expectancy. Yes, there is a problem. The problem is too much government involvement in health care.

Health care costs are high for the very same reason that Hospitals must charge $19 for an aspirin and $30 for a band-aid. It is because government has been interfering with the free market.

In a free market, Supply and demand determine price. When the price is free, demand skyrockets to epidemic proportions. This is just as would be expected by basic economics. Example: Medicaid pays for preventative health care for the poor. But instead of staying out of hospitals, Medicaid recipients are also the most frequent Hospital Emergency Room users. They show up for aspirins and band-aids and other minor non-problems and the mandatory paperwork takes up 20 more minutes of the doctor’s time. And malpractice insurance (tort lawyers) drive up the costs that must be passed along to you.

In the meantime, Amish will not seek medical help until the final hours of someone’s life. But they still want to die at home. And why should they pay to support your greed addiction?  They have no right to covet thy neighbor’s wealth, and neither do you.

The Amish will not take benefits. Not even Social Security. To them, taking benefits is proof that you do not trust God (Mark 11:24, Philippians 4:19, etc). Why is it that the Americans who still believe in the motto of the United States — In God We Trust — are the Americans who will never use the health care that the forces them to purchase? Again: why should they pay to support your greed addiction? Corban (Roman system of forced welfare contributions) nullifies the word of God according to Mark 7:11-13.

Why do your lazy obese smokers already receive more expensive health care then every other person on the planet yet end up lowering our life expectancy to 31st in the world? Answer: It is because Congress wants it that way.

In fact, Government provided health care is not constitutional except for battlefield injuries and for prisoners and for a few other indigent wards (by the way, care for the indigent is a State function, not federal). Even health care for on-the-job injuries of workers remains unconstitutional. Read what the Supreme Court said in Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co. 295 U.S. 330, quoted above.

Lazy obese smokers demand that congress force you to pay for their care. As well as others who keep risking AIDS, and diabetes, and hepatitis. And drug pushers who trick taxpayers — that’s you — into paying for the drugs they will resell. You wanted socialized medicine now you get what you wanted.

And, why must we entice pregnant foreigners to have their children here at your expense?

Insurance is for catastrophic loss. NOT for routine expenses. Your car insurance doesn’t pay for gasoline, or tires, or oil changes, or brakes or batteries. Your home insurance doesn’t pay for water, electricity, painting, plumbing repairs or even window replacement. They charge reasonable premiums. There is no created crisis in these free markets. Why would you expect health insurance to pay for routine expenses?

Shelter is also a necessity of life, but government does not yet force landlords and hotels to give this necessity of life to those who will not pay.   (Housing is a necessity of life according to the Supreme Court Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 and Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, etc.)

If congress were to force fire insurance companies to issue a fire policy while a house is burning down, then nobody will bother to spend their money on insurance premiums until their house is burning. If they did, then premiums would be higher than the average fire damage. Fire insurance does not pay for pre-existing conditions, why would you expect health insurance to pay for pre-existing conditions?

Just imagine what would happen if congress forced malpractice insurance to cover pre-existing malpractice.

Those who have overthrown America will not let the free market work for health insurance. They want you to pay higher premiums so smokers can continue to smoke, and heroin addicts can continue to share drug needles. Now they want to throw you into a risk pool of HIV fluids.

If you want congress to force taxpayers to pay for other people’s routine health expenses, then you will get what you want. But don’t complain about the consequences.

Tort reform is not even in the Health Care law. The United States has 94% of the world’s lawsuits to bleed us dry. Courts grant damage awards in frivolous lawsuits if a doctor didn’t conduct a test for some rare disorder that no reasonable doctor would have suspected. This increases their insurance to the point where fear of lawyers forces them to now provide extraordinary testing and treatment for everything.

Even with artificially inflated health care costs in an era of $19 aspirin and $30 band-aids, there is no reason health care insurance should exceed $5 a day. There are several faith-based health care risk-sharing programs where people voluntarily pay one another’s medical bills (but only bills that are over the $300 limit that they consider to be a routine expense, and they exclude pre-existing conditions). What a concept: Charity and compassion for neighbor, instead of brutal taxation and fear of tax seizures.

http://www.chministries.org/
http://samaritanministries.org/
http://www.libertyhealthshare.org/
http://www.mychristiancare.org/ Medi-Share program
http://www.mutualassurance.org

And charitable care is available from free clinics http://www.freeclinics.us/freeclinic.php

The Amish don’t have a health care crisis. And they certainly don’t have the financial means to participate in the problems that your congress created.

All of our out-of-control costs are caused by government. Why keep asking for more? At first it was drug purity laws in the 1920s, then mandatory prescriptions to keep you from treating yourself, then forcing doctors into time consuming paperwork, then rewarding ambulance chasing lawyers with enormous judgments to be paid by malpractice insurance when doctors opt for easy bankruptcy. This forces ever-higher insurance premiums to be paid by the rest of us. Making treatment information illegal — it is illegal if I tell you that Vitamin C cures scurvy — It is illegal if I tell you that drinking a glass of water can prevent dehydration. Imposing onerous regulations, harsh residency requirements, limiting what doctors can charge for treating Medicare patients. Forcing good doctors away and discouraging students from ever becoming doctors. Forcing hospitals to give away their best care to those who don’t need it, welcoming Medicaid parasites into Hospital Emergency Rooms for aspirins and band-aids that they don’t need (perhaps I exaggerate, but not by much). Childhood asthma has doubled in recent years despite much cleaner air (likely caused by automobile catalytic converters forced on us by you-know-who). Autism, ADHD, SIDS, allergies, asthma, auto-immune problems, behavioral violence, and seizures are increasing. Adolescent suicide caused by withdrawal from psychiatric prescriptions is a known problem. We have higher breast cancer rates than third world countries that have dreadful pollution problems. FOR CHILDREN UNDER 5 years old: one-in-25 had chronic illness in 1972. This is now one-in-six. FOR CHILDREN 6 TO 15 years old: one-in-32 had chronic illness in 1972. This is now one-in-five. And artificial sweeteners are another cause of chronic problems, even though they are government approved. Instead of telling your civil servants to back off, why are you demanding they worsen the problems they caused?

In December 2009 the CDC reported that autism disorders increased 57% in four years. It said that at the end of 2006 one in 70 boys and one in 315 girls were diagnosed with an autism disorder. The March 2014 CDC report shows autism disorders increased 30% in two years. The 2014 report shows autism one in 42 boys, and one in 189 girls. Spot the trend.

Why not ask for less government in a nation that is yearning to breathe free?

LEGISLATION

The recent health care “reform” compels a NATIONAL ID CARD.  They have every right to tag their own property.

The IRS now has 17 Obamacare enforcement functions.

You no longer have the right to pay to talk to a doctor. You must first seek a medical assistant who will determine the lowest cost path to your health care ration.

Doctors who want to do no harm will now be forced to administer a minimal “standard of care” regardless of side affects, rather than take a more cautious approach.

The home visit program seems to be voluntary for now, but the law allows the Health Secretary to require each State to provide a definition. Be prepared for forcible entry — which is what they already do with children of religious objectors.

What is next? Fines for poor diets, fines for improper bath mats, fines for improper hot-water temperature and what about helmets for joggers, and extra taxes for child sports teams that have a history of injury? And starvation camps for the obese could be the new “compelling government interest.”

I want to again quote Benjamin Rush, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, during the Constitutional debates in 1787:

“The Constitution of this Republic should make special provision for medical freedom. To restrict the art of healing to one class will constitute the Bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic. … Unless we put medical freedom into the constitution the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship and force people who wish doctors and treatment of their own choice to submit to only what the dictating outfit offers.”

WAIVING YOUR RIGHTS

Constitutionally guaranteed rights are “susceptible to restriction only to prevent grave and immediate danger to interests which the state may lawfully protect”. This phrase was used in many Supreme Court decisions to protect your rights.

The Supreme Court in 1905 determined that public health measures DO NOT trump your rights. A law textbook, Cooley’s Constitutional Limitations, 8th Edition, page 1229 quotes the Supreme Court’s Jacobson 197 US 11 decision (which upheld a $5 fine for Mr. Jacobson’s refusing a vaccine during a quarantined outbreak) as proof that “The police power is not supreme and is not unlimited. It is subject to the limitations imposed by the Federal Constitution upon every power of government. It will not be suffered to invade or impair the fundamental liberties of the citizen”.

Here are some of your rights that you so eagerly gave away:

“no right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person.” — Union Pacific Railway v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250, 251 (1891)

“Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent commits an assault, for which he is liable in damages. This is true except in cases of emergency where the patient is unconscious and where it is necessary to operate before consent can be obtained.” — Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hosp., 211 N.Y. 125, 219, 105 N.E. 92, 93 (1914)

“The root premise jurisprudentially is that ‘[e]very human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body’.” — Karp v. Cooley, 493 F.2d 408, 419 (5th Cir. 1974)

“The right to refuse medical treatment is deeply rooted in our common law. This right to bodily integrity was recognized by the United States Supreme Court over a century ago when it proclaimed ‘no right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person. . . . ‘ — In re Duran, 2001 PA Super 52, 769 A.2d 497 (2001)

“The underlying basis for the doctrine of informed consent is a patient’s right of self-determination, the right to intelligently decide whether to choose or decline a particular medical procedure. — Union Pacific Railway v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250, 251 (1891) and Acuna v. Turkish, 192 N.J. 399, 414, 930 A.2d 416 (2007)

Government has a right to regulate what is subsidizes (1942, Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111). Once government can determine your health care, then they have rights to your body. Once there is a compelling government interest in your health, then the government is allowed to use whatever police powers are needed to ignore your rights and accomplish their objectives.

Did the Obama appointment of Health czar Sunstein further their goal of “routine removal” of body parts from the living? According to an article on WND he believes that the government legally owns your body:

President Obama’s Health czar defended the possibility of removing organs from terminally ill without their permission. In his 2008 book, “Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness,” Sunstein and co-author Richard Thaler discussed multiple legal scenarios regarding organ donation. One possibility presented in the book, termed by Sunstein as “routine removal,” posits that “the state owns the rights to body parts of people who are dead or in certain hopeless conditions, and it can remove their organs without asking anyone’s permission.”

“Though it may sound grotesque, routine removal is not impossible to defend,” wrote Sunstein. “In theory, it would save lives…”

Is this the health reform that you wanted?

Are you sure that you want to throw away your rights to your body?

And there was NOTHING in the health care law about Tort Reform, which is one reason we already have the highest health care costs in the world.

WHY?

Why welcome Socialism? Just like any bully, the collectivists gang up and demand your money. — At least the bully’s once gave you a choice of “your money or your life”. Now the Fascists want both.

Remember that your benefactors get to control you. Health care will be rationed. It is a fact of life that those who pay the bills get to make the rules. Christ told his disciples in Luke 22:25 that benefactors will exercise authority over us. He also said that Corban (the Roman system of forced welfare contributions) nullifies the word of God.

And 2000 years ago Plutarch said

“It is truly said that the first destroyer of the liberties of a people is he who gave them bounties and largesse. ”

Or as Blackstone so eloquently stated in the introduction to his law books: “a state of dependence will inevitably oblige the inferior to take the will of him, on whom he depends, as the rule of his conduct “

The health care bill controls more than health care. You have already accepted seat belt laws (which had nothing to do with safety — school buses still don’t have belts). Soon it will be jail time for tobacco users, and a ban on fried food, forcible injections of the latest vaccine, prescriptions for aspirin, and starvation camps for the obese. If you allow these, what next? Then they will want in-home safety inspections, and proof that you are eating a government approved diet. Be careful what you wish for.

Why not wish for a free nation?

A government large enough to give you everything you want is strong enough to take everything you have.

Busser v. Snyder, 37 American Law Review (ALR) 1515:

“An Old Age Assistance Law is prohibited by a constitutional provision that no appropriation shall be made for charitable or benevolent purposes to any person.”

Alternatives:

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons has a list of cash payment friendly doctors. www.aaps.wufoo.com/reports/m5p6z0

The Oklahoma Surgery Center has a list of cash prices for some common surgery.  Look here before considering offshore surgery.  https://surgerycenterok.com/
While you are looking for surgery prices, don’t miss their surgeons’ opinions of regulated health care on their blog.

Why I am not a Constitutionalist

by

I once believed that our national problems could be solved by showing government officials the Constitution that they are sworn to uphold.  I am no longer a Constitutionalist.

I have repented from such a belief. Here are my reasons:
  • The signers of the constitution had no authority to sign it. Or to create a government. Or to violate the Articles of Confederation.
  • People are not a party to the Constitution. “We The States” created their creature. Our elected representatives had nothing to do with it. We are not responsible for controlling what others created.  Long after the Constitution was ratified the Georgia Supreme Court ruled in Padelford, Fay & Co. v. Mayor and Aldermen of City of Savannah (14 Ga. 438, in 1854): “No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of a breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a compact, he is not a party to it.”
  • The Constitutional Convention was convened under the Articles of Confederation. But the articles of Confederation Article XIII require unanimous ratification. There is no authority for the idea that three-fourths of the States can gang up and force other states into their “Supreme Law” that judges in every state would be thereby.
  • Under our Constitution, in 1798, Thomas Jefferson reassured the people of Kentucky that state inhabitants are subject only to three federal laws. The three crimes mentioned in the Constitution: piracy, treason and counterfeiting –“and no other crimes whatever”. (link) Are you subject to only three federal laws?

That’s right. Once you voluntarily submit yourself to federal laws, you cannot complain.
Once you consent to be governed, you have no standing in any court to redress grievance.

Biblical reasons:
  • The Bible requires standard weights and measures. (Leviticus 19:36 & Deuteronomy 25:13). How standard is our dollar? Our dollar is worth 2% of what it was in 1964.
  • We did not have a central government for the first ten books of the Bible. It is prohibited for a freeman to have a covering other than the Lord.  Having a central government is irresponsible.  It is your duty to manage your own affairs.  Electing or obeying a manmade (graven) lord is mutiny against legitimate authority, just like we were told in Romans 13.
  • In the Bible, it is evil to elect a King. First Samuel 12:17. The Bible warns against electing a King. The LORD Himself warned you in First Samuel 8:5-17 that your elected king will tax, tax and tax until you cannot stand it (and back then it was just 10%). Then, when society wants God back into their life, God will not answer your prayers (God honored your free-will, you got what you wanted, stop complaining). First Samuel 8:18 “And you will cry out in that day because of your king whom you have chosen for yourselves, and the LORD will not hear you in that day.”
  • The Bible prohibits treaties with pagan nations. Exodus 23:32.
  • The Bible prohibits a census. I wrote a book about this.
  • The Bible prohibits people from being sureties for debts (Proverbs 22:26) and yet we find your representatives, acting on your behalf, and in your name, binding you to pay the national debt.  Your representatives borrowed from the future to give you the benefits you wanted.  Your children are indentured to pay your debt.  Your covetousness practices cursed your children, just as you were warned in Second Peter chapter 2.
The whole Constitution thing is a scam.

The scam was to force you to pay the debts of the Revolutionary War.

The Constitutional Convention was convened under the Articles of Confederation in order to reorganize the national debt (the 18 million Livra that we borrowed ) for the purpose of getting enough taxing authority to satisfy the creditor.   — By the way, the note was signed by Ben Franklin with his British title ESQ.

Congress, under the Articles of Confederation, authorized Ben Franklin to borrow 18 million Livra from the French. He signed the note on July 16, 1782. The loan was due on January 1, 1788. When it became obvious that the note could not be paid, a Constitutional Convention was held to reorganize the bankruptcy. Did your government schools tell you this? Now read the first sentence of Article 6. We are still repaying that loan, which is why you are subject to the IRS which is run by your foreign benefactors.

The Constitutional Convention, which was held to amend the Articles of Confederation, prepared a Constitution that would be established when three-fourths of the states ratified it. Thereby forcing the non-consenting states to adapt a form of government against their will. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear any case that would question its own legitimacy in cases that were raised by learned jurists throughout the history of your once great nation. To study this issue, start with Clark’s Summary of American Law, Volume 1, Constitutional Law, page 465.

The Treaty of Paris, 1783, allows the United States to exist, yet King George claimed that he was retaining title over the Holy Roman Empire and the United States of America as Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector. The very authority that allows the United States to exist, perpetuates the notion that Kings rule by divine right, and also retains the authority over “your” treasury for the Holy Roman Empire. If you claim that the U.S. has won its independence, then you are acknowledging the legitimacy of rest of the Treaty.  Perhaps you can now understand why your Constitution was pushed on you, and why feudal tenure still applies, and why your U.S. Government is in no way founded upon the Christian religion. And indeed, to this very day, “your” Department of the Treasury is not part of your U.S. Government.*

On July 16, 1782 The North American Colonies entered into a Contract for the Guarantee of the re-payment of the 18 million lires entitled Contract Between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_…

Then they signed the The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_…

Under Article 4 it states: “It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.”

The Constitutional Convention was convened under the Articles of Confederation to restructure the debt payment.  If you became a federal citizen (by applying for a Social Security Number) then you are the collateral.

You consented — “striketh hands” Proverbs 22:26 and agreed to pay for the national debt. This is done by your own testimony. If you are employed through the federal government’s wage authorization number, then you have agreed to be the Human Resource.  Estopple prevents you from complaining about what you agreed to.  Furthermore, if you signed a federal form under penalty-of-perjury-oath then you agreed to be inferior to the graven image created by others.  One only swears an oath to a superior according to Hebrews 6:16. You deny that we are all created equal.  You ignore the warning in James 5:12 and deliberately condemn yourself.

* Don’t confuse the “U.S. Treasury”, which has the Mint, with the “Department of the Treasury” that has the IRS.

  • Title 31 U.S. Code chapter 3 does not list the IRS as a part of the U.S. Treasury.  (Note that the Government Printing Office no longer prints chapter 3 with the rest of the regulations)
  • The IRS is not an agency of the U.S. Government. (Proof#1 — the commissioner “story” is easily debunked), (Proof#2 — see response 4)
  • The IRS payroll is not paid by the Treasury, it is paid by the Department of Agriculture (see next paragraph).
  • Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order number 92, the IRS is trained under the direction of the United Nations Division of Human Resources.
  • Executive Order 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is under the direction of the Secretary of the United Nations. Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order number 91, the IRS entered into a Service Agreement with the U.S. Treasury Department (see Public Law 94-564 and its Legislative History page 5967) to service the Reorganization Plan for the Agency for International Development.
  • The IRS is an also an agency of INTERPOL. 22 U.S.C. §263a. The memorandum of understanding is between the Secretary of the Treasury and the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. They pay the IRS.

You may also be interested in how government regulated agriculture belongs to foreigners and why the IRS payroll is paid by the Department of Agriculture. See my essay From whom do the kings of the earth exact tribute, Item 10

To find out more about how you were tricked out of your rights by legalities that you didn’t understand, read my book The Citizen Cannot Complain.

 

Something is fishy in the U.S. fishing industry

by

by Steven D. Miller

America’s Pacific Northwest was famous for two industries.  The fishing industry and the Timber industry.  Both industries have been destroyed.

Join me in pondering the government deceptions that enslave us.

FISHING INDUSTRY

Seattle’s fishing industry has been decimated.

As it is with other food producers, U.S. governmental regulations, trade restrictions and taxes are forcing American fishermen out of business and encouraging foreign control of our food supply. Then they regulate foods to force us into political extortion.

http://notfooledbygovernment.com/something-is-fishy-in-the-united-states/
Very Fishy laws imposed on America

Of all the food imports into America, we spend more on foreign fish than any other food import category, except fruit. We are paying $Two Billion, with a B, dollars a month to foreigners who fish for us. (Source, see exhibit 7)   We could be paying better than average fishing wages to almost a million Americans.

America is under increasingly stringent foreign control. Communists must control the means of production. Just like it was for those who lived under Joseph Stalin, Communists will soon ration our food.

A federal law prevents our fishermen from appealing federal regulations in federal courts. This law was codified in Title 15 U.S. Code section 522, but the codified version fails to mention any reference to the law’s words “producers of aquatic products”. They don’t want you to find it.

But courts are required to enforce it. Federal Rules of Evidence rule 1101(e) once stipulated how the rules of evidence apply.

(e) Rules applicable in part.—In the following proceedings these
rules apply to the extent that matters of evidence are not provided
for in the statutes which govern procedure therein or in
other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory
authority: …;
review of orders of the Secretary of the Interior under section 2 of
the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing associations of producers of
aquatic products’’ approved June 25, 1934 (15 U.S.C. 522)

By the way, 1934 was the year FDR socialists started all those farm subsidies. It was the year after they confiscated our gold coins. It was two years after Congress changed our national anthem to one that does not mention God. Another hint — It was three years after Washington State made the bar association an agency of the State.

That’s right! Fishermen cannot appeal to Federal Courts any administrative order that prohibits their marketing or lobbying attempts to do anything about this foreign takeover. Without this law, the proponent of a rule would have the burden of proof according to Title 5, U.S. Code section 556d.

The new 2016 Rules of Evidence rule 1101(e) now only states:

(e) Other Statutes and Rules. A federal statute or a rule prescribed by the Supreme Court may provide for admitting or excluding evidence independently from these rules.”

They don’t want you to find out.

ENVIRONMENTALISTS

The Pacific Northwest had two traditional industries. The Salmon fishing and the timber industry have sustained the region for decades.

Environmentalists have now re-categorized fish. Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) is no longer a salmon, it’s now a trout. Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush) is no longer a trout, it’s now a char. Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) is no longer a trout. It is now a salmon.

The environmentalists keep interfering with everything.  Here are some other examples: First they shut down the timber industry around Seattle with their Spotted Owl theory. Then they defined a wetland habitat as any puddle that lasts for 6 weeks. Even if it is a stormwater retention pond that they required. Then they demanded that the federal agencies regulate their beloved wetlands, authorized only by a law that allows federal government to regulate oil pollution on navigable waters. (The official regulation, which is not even a law passed by Congress, calls a wetland “Waters of the United States” at Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, section 122.2).  Now bureaucrats have interpreted their regulation to include: Controlling stormwater runoff, or not controlling stormwater runoff. Using well water, or not using well water. Casting a shadow onto a wetland, or removing a shadow. Etc. Then they petition courts to put a 100 foot buffer area around any pond scum “habitat”. Then courts say that prohibiting someone from entering 95% of their own land does not qualify for just compensation under the Fifth Amendment.

Prior to 1985 there were no Caspian Terns (a bird) nesting near the Columbia River.  Then the federal government built Rice Island in the Columbia River and declared the Caspian Tern to be a federally protected bird.  Now these birds eat 15 million young salmon every year as they migrate toward the Pacific Ocean.  Some salmon are now threatened species. And now Orca whales are starving and the eagle population is down, and fishing season is severely limited. Oh my, what could the problem be? (They blame global climate change.)

And since environmental regulations require most seafood to now be imported, guess what happens when you import Lobster tails, while obeying all known laws. You go to prison . This was also mentioned in John Stossel’s video Everything is Illegal.

If they can regulate hard working fishermen out of business, they can do it to you. Just like they forced family farmers out of business. Just like they forced factories out of the country.  Speak up now while you have a chance. Communism must have government control of the means of production. They already control most of your food supplies and your congress.

Foreign ownership of U.S. farms has skyrocketed in the past two years. Because we are no longer allowed to take care of ourselves, the U.S. has now become the world’s largest debtor. China is our largest creditor, and  China will start rationing our food as I mention in my post on Farmer Bill Gates.

“Like fish taken in a cruel net … So the sons of men are snared in an evil time, When it falls suddenly upon them.” — Ecclesiastes 9:12

– – – –

YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN

Bill Gates, farmer

Food Disparagement Laws

www.FishingHurts.com is an animal rights activist website that is against fishing.

Shattered Dreams documents the destruction caused by Environmentalists

Land Rights group NARLO.org

You may also be interested in why our government regulated agriculture really belongs to foreigners, and why the IRS payroll is paid by the Department of Agriculture. See my essay From whom do the kings of the earth exact tribute, Item 10

To find out more about how you were tricked out of your rights by legalities that you didn’t understand, read my book The Citizen Cannot Complain. 

If you need a writer to produce a well researched article, ghost blog, or marketing content, I am available.

Freedom in America

by

On July Fourth we celebrate the anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and we proclaim America to be free.  The U.S. Constitution secured to their posterity YOUR blessings of liberty.

Yet today’s Millennials are demanding that we have fewer rights. Ben Franklin had a message for them.

Here is a Ben Franklin quote inscribed on a plaque in the stairwell of the Statue of Liberty:

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

If you demand that government protect your safety, you will lose your freedom.  Are you still free? Rights only come with responsibilities.  You are responsible for your own safety.  Those who are irresponsible lose their rights.  Every Law Dictionary will tell you “The civil laws reduce an ungrateful freedman to his original slavery” Libertinum ingratum leges civiles in pristinam servitutem redigunt.

The Declaration of Independence used the phrase we “are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights” to refer to our God-given rights that government is instituted among men to secure.
God gave us a free will to make our own decisions.
Just how free are we to make our own decisions?

Can you grow your front lawn to any height you want?  Can you flush your toilet with more than 1.6 gallons, or buy a 60 Watt light bulb, or did someone else make these decisions for you?

The Constitution prohibits States from impairing the obligation of contracts. Can you sell lemonade from your own front lawn without begging for a permit and paying a fee?

Your great-grandfather blasted through mountains without permits to build a railroad from sea to shining sea. They lived in a nation that secured the blessings of liberty to their posterity. Can you repair your back porch without begging for a permit?

In 1753 the world knew that eating citrus fruit prevented scurvy.  In the U.S. today, it is illegal for me to tell you that eating citrus will prevent scurvy.  It is illegal for me to tell you that drinking water will prevent dehydration. When the U.S. Constitution was written, everyone knew that they had a right to buy medications to defend against corporal assaults.  It was the right of self-defense.

In 1919 everyone in America knew that it would take a constitutional amendment to ban a substance. That was here in America where Coca-Cola once had cocaine and you could buy Opium from the Sears Catalog and you could buy dynamite from the hardware store.  What about now?  Can you buy a life-saving medication without begging permission from a government-supervised pharmacist and a government regulated physician?  There was ONLY one drug law when the United States became a country.  Slaves needed their owners permission to take medications.  The Constitution changed this.  The Constitution prohibited slave owners from controlling their slaves’ medications.  Slave rights had been “wholly annihilated, or reduced to a shadow” and the Constitution changed this.*  Have your rights been “wholly annihilated, or reduced to a shadow”?  If so then you are a slave.

The Supreme Court says that your labor is your most sacred property. Can you sell your labor without a wage authorization number? Can you buy or sell in normal transactions without a banking authorization number?

Government was created to secure the blessings of liberty. The right to personal liberty is defined as the right to unrestrained locomotion. Yet today you can be arrested for being on a sidewalk without first purchasing a credential from a government.

The Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional for Nevada to tax stagecoach passengers leaving the state. You can no longer buy a ticket for an airline, train or Greyhound bus without presenting an ID (travel permit) issued by a government. You must first apply for and pay for the government credential to travel.

Don’t claim to live in a free country until you see freedom.

For more information on liberty read my essay America Held Captive — Part 1 — How to recognize liberty if you see it.

For more information on personal liberty read my essay on driving.

For more information on identification credentials read my eBook on Identification Credentials.

If you want to know how you were tricked into waiving most of your rights read my eBook The Citizen Cannot Complain.

*  see my essay America Held Captive — Part 4 — How to recognize oppression when you see it.

 

Pride parade puzzled by Christian values

by

The Supreme Court recently determined that a Christian baker can refuse to bake a cake for homosexuals.  Yet enraged liberals still demand Christian approval of those who publicly brag about their reprobate sexual perversions.

The anti-Christian agenda

The gay agenda is not about flaunting sexual perversion in public.  It is about the destruction of Christianity.  Homosexuals hate Christians because Christians cannot be tolerant of perversions.  The homosexuals of Romans 1:26 and 27 are worthy of death, as are those who tolerate them (Romans 1:32).  That’s right!  Christians must not tolerate homosexuals.  The pride parade mentioned in Isaiah 3:9 continues their march to hell and they want everyone to join them.

Liberals have no moral compass. Liberals like to redefine words in their never-ending battle against truth, justice and the American Way. They want to play God until traditional values are unenforceable  They want to reaffirm among themselves that violating millennia of moral laws will have no consequences.  God invented sex with consequences.  Liberals don’t want to be bothered.  Liberals even kill 3,000 babies a day and they call it health care.  They have no concept that it is idolatry to invent a more permissive god of their own choosing.

If you want to scan the moral battlefield for scraps of truth, then keep reading.

In 1986 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 US 186:

To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching.”

It is the Laws of Nature that entitle governments to exist. The government’s authority to execute murderers comes from the same divine Laws of Nature. Yet today’s courts protect THE crime against nature. A crime that has always been more detestable than other crimes against nature such as murder or child rape.  Courts once venerated as “the pure fountain of justice” are now polluted by the perversion, filth and shame of homosex advocacy.

The Planned Destruction of Morals

Liberal globalists want a one-world government.  But they must first destroy all existing governments. Public acceptance of homosexuals is part of the ongoing plan to destroy America. The moral fabric of the universe is hanging by a thread. The future of mankind hangs in the balance*.

Throughout history, both Christians and pagans had similar values.  Values that would preserve their society from decay.  The Goths would bury them alive. Romans would crucify them (both Justinian Code 9.9.31 and Theodosianus Code 9.7.6). The Brits would burn them at the stake.  Homosex was punished by death in England up to 1861 and in Canada (enforcing our shared English common law) until 1869.  The received-law-of-the-land in America proclaims that sodomy is “more detestable” than child rape.

 

The law of nature is “binding over all the globe in all countries, and at all times; no human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this”*. Yet Satan’s disciples have gained such a political force that only a few countries still punish homosexuals. By what authority did the U.S. Supreme Court allow homosex just because a UN report that said some countries tolerate homosexuals?

 

Crime against nature are to be punished

The first sentence of the Declaration of Independence says that the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle the United States to exist.  The Constitution goes on to state that we are endowed by our Creator with unailenable rights. If the United States is entitled to exist, then these divine natural laws endow us with the right to punish homosexuals. Here are the authorities to prove it.

Every Law Dictionary will tell you Peccata contra naturam sunt gravissima. But Black’s Law Dictionary 1999 edition changed the translation.  Their lawyers did not like the English word heinous.

We execute criminals out of our love for our neighbors.  Driving out evil is love, not hate.  Millennia of moral teaching requires it.  Whereas using a public office to protect such offenders will “cut up government by the roots, and poison the very fountain of public security.” (quote from John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, section 222)

  • “This law of nature, being coeval with mankind and dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to any other — It is binding over all the globe in all countries, and at all times; no human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this: and such of them as are valid derive all their force, and all their authority, mediately or immediately, from this original…. neither could any other law possibly exist… for we are all equal, without any other superior but him who is the author of our being. … Nay, if any human law should allow [violation of natural law], we are bound to transgress that human law, or else we must offend both the natural and the divine.” (Blackstone’s Commentaries)
  • The unchanging Lord of the Bible is not going to change just because someone told you to tolerate child rape or homosexuals. We are still one nation under God.
  • Murder is only A crime against nature. Child rape is only A crime against nature. Consensual homosexual sodomy is THE crime against nature. It is traditionally punished more harshly than lesser crimes against nature.
YOUR DUTY TO ENFORCE TRADITIONAL VALUES
  • Ignorance of the law of nature, which every one is bound to know, excuses no man.1  It is a crime to not report a crime.  Acting and consenting adults are liable to the same punishment.  It is a crime to not report crimes against nature such as murder, child rape or homosex.
  • “the right of punishing crimes against the law of nature, as murder and the like, is in a state of mere nature vested in every individual” 2
  • The Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle the United States to exist.3 We are one nation under God. The received law of the land continues until cancelled by the legislature with “express words of nullity”4 but no congressman can cancel the authority for his government to exist.5
  • John Locke’s Second Treatise Of Government states that a government that would not execute the laws would be “politics inconceivable to human capacity, and inconsistent with human society.”
  • When laws imposed by the state fail, we must act by the law of nature. 6
  • We must then “bear the sword of justice by the consent of the whole community. And to this precedent natural power of individuals must be referred that right [even foreign diplomats could be executed] in case they have offended, not indeed against the municipal laws of the country, but against the divine laws of nature, and become liable thereby to forfeit their lives for their guilt.”7
  • Contracts that are made against good morals have no force.8 And agreements founded upon an immoral consideration are not to be observed.9

We do not execute murderers because we hate. We execute murderers because we love our neighbors. Murder is a crime against nature.  THE Crime against nature (Sodomy) is has always been a crime more detestable than murder.

It is your duty to speak out against evil. You will suffer the consequence of what your neighbors have tolerated. Just as General Douglas MacArthur warned us in his speech December 12, 1951:

History fails to record a single precedent in which nations subject to moral decay have not passed into political and economic decline. There has been either a spiritual awakening to overcome the moral lapse, or a progressive deterioration leading to ultimate national disaster.”

The English language in the United States defines religion as the performance of all known duties to your fellow man.  You are to drive out evil from your society.  We punish crimes against nature because we love our neighbors.  It is love, it is not hate. Again: the first sentence of the Declaration of Independence declares that the Laws of Nature entitle the U.S. to exist. You cannot have it both ways.  You cannot tolerate Crimes against nature AND also have a legitimate government.

BIBLICAL VALUES

The Christian Bible tells us that the unchanging God of the Bible gave homosexuals over to a reprobate mind so that they might be destroyed. (Romans 1:28)

Prior to the existence of any Jewish law, the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed for tolerating homosexuals. Even Lot was affected by this tolerance of perversion. This was in 1896 BC, long before the first Jew existed. Don’t blame Jewish laws for the universal precept requiring capital punishment for homosex.

Leviticus 20:13 “They must be put to death….” according to the NIV Bible translation.  “They shall surely be put to death” is the KJV translation.  Leviticus 20 is not the law of Moses, it is the law of the LORD according to verses 7,8.  Leviticus 18:26 is a command from God requiring everyone in the nation to keep God’s law and prohibits everyone, including foreigners, from committing such abominations.

In Genesis 18 the unchanging Lord Himself appeared in physical form to Abraham, along with two angels. The Lord was here on earth to supervise the genocide of Sodom and Gomorrah. To burn to death the homosexuals and kill those, like Lot’s wife, who tolerated them.

And in the Christian times (in Romans 1:26,27,32) we learn that homosexuals “are worthy of death” (direct quote from King James Bible) as are those who approve of them. These words are in your Bible.

Jude said homosexuals will burn in eternal fire.  In Romans 1:26, 27, 28 God Himself gives them over to a reprobate mind so that they will be condemned.  Verse 31 says they are worthy of death, as are those who tolerate them.   This LAW HAS NOT CHANGED IN TWO MILLENNIA.  By the way, it is still a crime to tolerate (not report) a felony. And today the maxim of law still requires consenting adults to be liable to the same punishments as the criminals.

King Asa was one of the most righteous kings in the Bible. First Kings 15:11-12 (KJV):

And Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, as did David his father. And he took away the sodomites out of the land, ….”

As did Asa’s son Jehoshaphat in First Kings 22:46.

As did King Josiah in Second Kings 23:7.

And he brake down the houses of the sodomites”

The righteous drive out evil. Driving out evil is not hate, it is love. The righteous will enjoy the fruit of their deeds. Disaster is upon the wicked. The wicked will suffer the consequence of what they have done.

Isaiah 3:8-11 (NIV translation):

… The look on their faces testifies against them; they parade their sin like Sodom; they do not hide it. Woe to them! They have brought disaster upon themselves. Tell the righteous it will be well with them, for they will enjoy the fruit of their deeds. Woe to the wicked! Disaster is upon them! They will be paid back for what their hands have done.

Notice that Isaiah 3:9 mentions a pride parade. Disaster is upon the wicked.

The Christian Bible gives these warnings. Confirm them for yourself:

  • Homosexuals know the due punishment for their perversion (Romans 1:27). They know that they will suffer the punishment of eternal fire according to Jude verse 7: “Sodom and Gomorrah … serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire”. They know that they cannot go to heaven according to Galatians 5:19 and First Corinthians 6:9.
  • Romans 1:26,27,32 lesbians and sodomites “are worthy of death”. But Romans 1:32 continues. It imputes this death punishment to those who merely tolerate – the NIV and the New King James Version both use the phrase “approve of those who practice”.  The Amplified Bible uses the term “tolerate”  – these crimes. This leads up to a promise of reconciliation for the repentant four verses later, and warnings of wrath for those who reject the truth.
  • First Corinthians 6:9-10  Tells us that homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God.  The King James translation put it this way: “nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind. . .” 10
  • First Timothy 1:9-10 “Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane,.. For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind … “10
  • Both Peter and Jude refer to homosexuals as beasts. Peter called them unthinking11 beasts to be caught and destroyed. (Second Peter 2:12)
  • Cursed is he who keeps his sword from bloodshed. Jeremiah 48:10.
  • Cowards shall have their place in the lake of fire. Revelation 21:8.

he Jewish law is more explicit than these Christian precepts. Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 are explicit punishments for consensual homosex, not rape. In Leviticus 20 the LORD gave his laws for his people. Homosexuals in verse 13, were to be driven out of society by the death penalty. Five verses earlier in the same chapter of Leviticus has instructions from the unchanging God of the Bible. Leviticus 20:8 (KJV) “And ye shall keep my statutes, and do them: I am the LORD which sanctify you.”

It is your duty to speak out against evil.

Contra negantem principia non est disputandum. There can be no debate with one who denies principles.

“All unnatural carnal copulations, whether with man or beast” are to be harshly punished. The reprobate community wants you to believe that only forcible sodomy can be punished. Such as that depicted in the painting by Edouard Henri Avril.

 

* For more information read my book Defense of Marriage — Part 2 — Crimes Against Nature.  (Here…)

  1. Maxim of law: Ignorantia juris quod quisque tenetur scire, neminem excusat.
  2. Blackstone’s Book 4, Public Wrongs, page 7. The U.S. Supreme Court confirms that Blackstone’s law encyclopedia was part of the received law of the land.
  3. According to the first sentence of the Declaration of Independence
  4. U.S. Supreme Court, as for example, in the marriage case Meister v. Moore
  5. Their oath-of-office to uphold the Constitution that created their office
  6. Maxim of law: Legibus sumptis desinentibus, lege naturae utendum est.
  7. Blackstone’s introduction to Book 4. The U.S. Supreme Court confirms that Blackstone’s law encyclopedia was part of the received law of the land.
  8. Maxim of law Pacta quae contra bonos mores fiunt nullam vim habere
  9. Maxim of law Pacta quae turpem causam continent non sunt observanda
  10. See Strong’s Concordance Lexicon reference 733 for a definition of “them that defile themselves with mankind” άρσενοκοίτης a sodomite.
  11. άλογα — unthinking, irrational, without reason, unreasonable, absurd